Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	ira.weiny@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
	alison.schofield@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cxl: add RAS status unmasking for CXL
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 11:02:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fd4e5fe-da35-a46f-6c6f-59e2e29ca8a4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221215172147.00004378@Huawei.com>



On 12/15/2022 10:21 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:52:31 -0700
> Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> By default the CXL RAS mask registers bits are defaulted to 1's and
>> suppress all error reporting. If the kernel has negotiated ownership
>> of error handling for CXL then unmask the mask registers by writing 0s.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Based on patch posted by Ira [1] to export CXL native error reporting control.
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20221212070627.1372402-2-ira.weiny@intel.com/
>>
>> v3:
>> - Remove flex bus port status check. (Jonathan)
>> - Only unmask known mask bits. (Jonathan)
>>
>> v2:
>> - Add definition of PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2_FLIT. (Dan)
>> - Return error for cxl_pci_ras_unmask(). (Dan)
>> - Add dev_dbg() for register bits to be cleared. (Dan)
>> - Check Flex Port DVSEC status. (Dan)
>> ---
>>   drivers/cxl/cxl.h             |    1 +
>>   drivers/cxl/pci.c             |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h |    1 +
>>   3 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>> index 1b1cf459ac77..31e795c6d537 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>> @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ static inline int ways_to_eiw(unsigned int ways, u8 *eiw)
>>   #define   CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK (GENMASK(16, 14) | GENMASK(11, 0))
>>   #define CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_OFFSET 0x4
>>   #define   CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_MASK (GENMASK(16, 14) | GENMASK(11, 0))
>> +#define   CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_F256B_MASK BIT(8)
>>   #define CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_SEVERITY_OFFSET 0x8
>>   #define   CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_SEVERITY_MASK (GENMASK(16, 14) | GENMASK(11, 0))
>>   #define CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_OFFSET 0xC
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
>> index 33083a522fd1..9cbec159c57b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
>> @@ -419,6 +419,53 @@ static void disable_aer(void *pdev)
>>   	pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pdev);
>>   }
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * CXL v3.0 6.2.3 Table 6-4
>> + * The table indicates that if PCIe Flit Mode is set, then CXL is in 256B flits
>> + * mode, otherwise it's 68B flits mode.
>> + */
>> +static bool cxl_pci_flit_256(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	u32 lnksta2;
>> +
>> +	pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2, &lnksta2);
>> +	return lnksta2 & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2_FLIT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int cxl_pci_ras_unmask(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(pdev->bus);
>> +	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +	void __iomem *addr;
>> +	u32 val, mask;
>> +
>> +	if (!cxlds->regs.ras)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	/* BIOS has CXL error control */
>> +	if (!host_bridge->native_cxl_error)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +	addr = cxlds->regs.ras + CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_OFFSET;
>> +	val = readl(addr);
>> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Uncorrectable RAS Errors Mask: %#x\n", val);
>> +
>> +	mask = CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_MASK;
>> +	if (!cxl_pci_flit_256(pdev))
>> +		mask &= ~CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_F256B_MASK;
>> +	val ^= mask;
> 
> End of day so I might have this completely wrong.

No you are correct. I thought of it right after I hit send. It should be:

-	val ^= mask;
+	val &= ~mask;

> 
> Whilst that 'works' because the default is all 1s. I'd like this code
> not to assume that, particularly as we don't set them back to masked on exit.
> 
> Imagine calling it twice.  Second time around val is
> ~CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_MASK which is then xored with CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_MASK_MASK
> resulting in use masking them all again.
> 
> 
>> +	writel(val, addr);
>> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Unmasked Uncorrectable RAS Errors Mask: %#x\n", val);
>> +
>> +	addr = cxlds->regs.ras + CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_MASK_OFFSET;
>> +	val = readl(addr);
>> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Correctable RAS Errors Mask: %#x\n", val);
>> +	val ^= CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_MASK_MASK;
>> +	writel(val, addr);
>> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Unmasked Correctable RAS Errors Mask: %#x\n", val);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>>   {
>>   	struct cxl_register_map map;
>> @@ -498,6 +545,7 @@ static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>>   
>>   	if (cxlds->regs.ras) {
>>   		pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(pdev);
>> +		cxl_pci_ras_unmask(pdev);
>>   		rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, disable_aer, pdev);
>>   		if (rc)
>>   			return rc;
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
>> index 82a03ea954af..576ee2ec973f 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
>> @@ -693,6 +693,7 @@
>>   #define  PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TX_MARGIN	0x0380 /* Transmit Margin */
>>   #define  PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_HASD		0x0020 /* HW Autonomous Speed Disable */
>>   #define PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2		0x32	/* Link Status 2 */
>> +#define  PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2_FLIT		BIT(10) /* Flit Mode Status */
>>   #define PCI_CAP_EXP_ENDPOINT_SIZEOF_V2	0x32	/* end of v2 EPs w/ link */
>>   #define PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2		0x34	/* Slot Capabilities 2 */
>>   #define  PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2_IBPD	0x00000001 /* In-band PD Disable Supported */
>>
>>
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2022-12-15 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-14 23:52 [PATCH v3] cxl: add RAS status unmasking for CXL Dave Jiang
2022-12-15 17:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-12-15 18:02   ` Dave Jiang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2fd4e5fe-da35-a46f-6c6f-59e2e29ca8a4@intel.com \
    --to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox