From: "Li, Ming" <ming4.li@intel.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] cxl/pci: Use synchronous API for DOE
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 16:56:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3359d431-6ad1-8577-6f16-cdc17da5fe42@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c9923e59-176c-2e52-9ebf-58bb25750083@intel.com>
On 2/3/2023 4:53 PM, Li, Ming wrote:
> On 1/24/2023 8:52 AM, Ira Weiny wrote:
>> Lukas Wunner wrote:
>>> A synchronous API for DOE has just been introduced. Convert CXL CDAT
>>> retrieval over to it.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
>>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 62 ++++++++++++++----------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>>
>
> ......
>
>>> static int cxl_cdat_get_length(struct device *dev,
>>> struct pci_doe_mb *cdat_doe,
>>> size_t *length)
>>> {
>>> - DECLARE_CDAT_DOE_TASK(CDAT_DOE_REQ(0), t);
>>> + u32 request = CDAT_DOE_REQ(0);
>>> + u32 response[32];
>>> int rc;
>>>
>>> - rc = pci_doe_submit_task(cdat_doe, &t.task);
>>> + rc = pci_doe(cdat_doe, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
>>> + CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS,
>>> + &request, sizeof(request),
>>> + &response, sizeof(response));
>>> if (rc < 0) {
>>> - dev_err(dev, "DOE submit failed: %d", rc);
>>> + dev_err(dev, "DOE failed: %d", rc);
>>> return rc;
>>> }
>>> - wait_for_completion(&t.c);
>>> - if (t.task.rv < sizeof(u32))
>>> + if (rc < sizeof(u32))
>>> return -EIO;
>>>
>
> Sorry, I didn't find the original patchset email, only can reply here.
> Should this "if (rc < sizeof(u32))" be "if (rc < 2 * sizeof(u32))"?
> Because below code used response[1] directly, that means we need unless two u32 in response payload.
Sorry, at least(not unless) two u32 in response payload.
> Thanks
> Ming
>
>>> - *length = t.response_pl[1];
>>> + *length = response[1]>> dev_dbg(dev, "CDAT length %zu\n", *length);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> @@ -546,26 +521,29 @@ static int cxl_cdat_read_table(struct device *dev,
>>> int entry_handle = 0;
>>>
>>> do {
>>> - DECLARE_CDAT_DOE_TASK(CDAT_DOE_REQ(entry_handle), t);
>>> + u32 request = CDAT_DOE_REQ(entry_handle);
>>> + u32 response[32];
>>> size_t entry_dw;
>>> u32 *entry;
>>> int rc;
>>>
>>> - rc = pci_doe_submit_task(cdat_doe, &t.task);
>>> + rc = pci_doe(cdat_doe, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
>>> + CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS,
>>> + &request, sizeof(request),
>>> + &response, sizeof(response));
>>> if (rc < 0) {
>>> - dev_err(dev, "DOE submit failed: %d", rc);
>>> + dev_err(dev, "DOE failed: %d", rc);
>>> return rc;
>>> }
>>> - wait_for_completion(&t.c);
>>> /* 1 DW header + 1 DW data min */
>>> - if (t.task.rv < (2 * sizeof(u32)))
>>> + if (rc < (2 * sizeof(u32)))
>>> return -EIO;
>>>
>>> /* Get the CXL table access header entry handle */
>>> entry_handle = FIELD_GET(CXL_DOE_TABLE_ACCESS_ENTRY_HANDLE,
>>> - t.response_pl[0]);
>>> - entry = t.response_pl + 1;
>>> - entry_dw = t.task.rv / sizeof(u32);
>>> + response[0]);
>>> + entry = response + 1;
>>> + entry_dw = rc / sizeof(u32);
>>> /* Skip Header */
>>> entry_dw -= 1;
>>> entry_dw = min(length / sizeof(u32), entry_dw);
>>> --
>>> 2.39.1
>>>
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-23 10:10 [PATCH v2 00/10] Collection of DOE material Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] PCI/DOE: Silence WARN splat with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 0:33 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 10:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-25 21:05 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 16:18 ` Gregory Price
2023-02-10 23:50 ` Dan Williams
2023-01-23 10:12 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] PCI/DOE: Fix memory leak " Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 0:35 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 10:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 23:52 ` Dan Williams
2023-01-23 10:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] PCI/DOE: Provide synchronous API and use it internally Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 0:48 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 10:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-24 20:07 ` Ira Weiny
2023-02-10 23:57 ` Dan Williams
2023-01-23 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] cxl/pci: Use synchronous API for DOE Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 0:52 ` Ira Weiny
2023-02-03 8:53 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-03 8:56 ` Li, Ming [this message]
2023-02-03 9:54 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 11:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 22:17 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] PCI/DOE: Make asynchronous API private Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 0:55 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 11:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-23 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] PCI/DOE: Allow mailbox creation without devres management Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 12:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-24 12:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-03 9:06 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-03 9:09 ` Li, Ming
2023-02-03 10:08 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 22:03 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] PCI/DOE: Create mailboxes on device enumeration Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 1:14 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 12:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-23 10:18 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] cxl/pci: Use CDAT DOE mailbox created by PCI core Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 1:18 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 12:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] PCI/DOE: Make mailbox creation API private Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 1:25 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 12:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-23 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] PCI/DOE: Relax restrictions on request and response size Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 22:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-24 1:43 ` Ira Weiny
2023-02-10 21:47 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 12:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-24 23:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-25 9:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 22:10 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Collection of DOE material Bjorn Helgaas
2023-02-10 21:39 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11 0:04 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3359d431-6ad1-8577-6f16-cdc17da5fe42@intel.com \
--to=ming4.li@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox