Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Li, Ming" <ming4.li@intel.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] cxl/pci: Use synchronous API for DOE
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 16:56:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3359d431-6ad1-8577-6f16-cdc17da5fe42@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c9923e59-176c-2e52-9ebf-58bb25750083@intel.com>

On 2/3/2023 4:53 PM, Li, Ming wrote:
> On 1/24/2023 8:52 AM, Ira Weiny wrote:
>> Lukas Wunner wrote:
>>> A synchronous API for DOE has just been introduced.  Convert CXL CDAT
>>> retrieval over to it.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
>>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 62 ++++++++++++++----------------------------
>>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>>
> 
> ......
> 
>>>  static int cxl_cdat_get_length(struct device *dev,
>>>  			       struct pci_doe_mb *cdat_doe,
>>>  			       size_t *length)
>>>  {
>>> -	DECLARE_CDAT_DOE_TASK(CDAT_DOE_REQ(0), t);
>>> +	u32 request = CDAT_DOE_REQ(0);
>>> +	u32 response[32];
>>>  	int rc;
>>>  
>>> -	rc = pci_doe_submit_task(cdat_doe, &t.task);
>>> +	rc = pci_doe(cdat_doe, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
>>> +		     CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS,
>>> +		     &request, sizeof(request),
>>> +		     &response, sizeof(response));
>>>  	if (rc < 0) {
>>> -		dev_err(dev, "DOE submit failed: %d", rc);
>>> +		dev_err(dev, "DOE failed: %d", rc);
>>>  		return rc;
>>>  	}
>>> -	wait_for_completion(&t.c);
>>> -	if (t.task.rv < sizeof(u32))
>>> +	if (rc < sizeof(u32))
>>>  		return -EIO;
>>>  
> 
> Sorry, I didn't find the original patchset email, only can reply here.
> Should this "if (rc < sizeof(u32))" be "if (rc < 2 * sizeof(u32))"?
> Because below code used response[1] directly, that means we need unless two u32 in response payload.

Sorry, at least(not unless) two u32 in response payload.

> Thanks
> Ming 
> 
>>> -	*length = t.response_pl[1];
>>> +	*length = response[1]>>  	dev_dbg(dev, "CDAT length %zu\n", *length);
>>>  
>>>  	return 0;
>>> @@ -546,26 +521,29 @@ static int cxl_cdat_read_table(struct device *dev,
>>>  	int entry_handle = 0;
>>>  
>>>  	do {
>>> -		DECLARE_CDAT_DOE_TASK(CDAT_DOE_REQ(entry_handle), t);
>>> +		u32 request = CDAT_DOE_REQ(entry_handle);
>>> +		u32 response[32];
>>>  		size_t entry_dw;
>>>  		u32 *entry;
>>>  		int rc;
>>>  
>>> -		rc = pci_doe_submit_task(cdat_doe, &t.task);
>>> +		rc = pci_doe(cdat_doe, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
>>> +			     CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS,
>>> +			     &request, sizeof(request),
>>> +			     &response, sizeof(response));
>>>  		if (rc < 0) {
>>> -			dev_err(dev, "DOE submit failed: %d", rc);
>>> +			dev_err(dev, "DOE failed: %d", rc);
>>>  			return rc;
>>>  		}
>>> -		wait_for_completion(&t.c);
>>>  		/* 1 DW header + 1 DW data min */
>>> -		if (t.task.rv < (2 * sizeof(u32)))
>>> +		if (rc < (2 * sizeof(u32)))
>>>  			return -EIO;
>>>  
>>>  		/* Get the CXL table access header entry handle */
>>>  		entry_handle = FIELD_GET(CXL_DOE_TABLE_ACCESS_ENTRY_HANDLE,
>>> -					 t.response_pl[0]);
>>> -		entry = t.response_pl + 1;
>>> -		entry_dw = t.task.rv / sizeof(u32);
>>> +					 response[0]);
>>> +		entry = response + 1;
>>> +		entry_dw = rc / sizeof(u32);
>>>  		/* Skip Header */
>>>  		entry_dw -= 1;
>>>  		entry_dw = min(length / sizeof(u32), entry_dw);
>>> -- 
>>> 2.39.1
>>>
>>
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-03  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-23 10:10 [PATCH v2 00/10] Collection of DOE material Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] PCI/DOE: Silence WARN splat with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24  0:33   ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 10:32     ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-25 21:05       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 16:18   ` Gregory Price
2023-02-10 23:50   ` Dan Williams
2023-01-23 10:12 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] PCI/DOE: Fix memory leak " Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24  0:35   ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 10:33     ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 23:52   ` Dan Williams
2023-01-23 10:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] PCI/DOE: Provide synchronous API and use it internally Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24  0:48   ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 10:40   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-24 20:07     ` Ira Weiny
2023-02-10 23:57   ` Dan Williams
2023-01-23 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] cxl/pci: Use synchronous API for DOE Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24  0:52   ` Ira Weiny
2023-02-03  8:53     ` Li, Ming
2023-02-03  8:56       ` Li, Ming [this message]
2023-02-03  9:54       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 11:01   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 22:17     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] PCI/DOE: Make asynchronous API private Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24  0:55   ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 11:03   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-23 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] PCI/DOE: Allow mailbox creation without devres management Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 12:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-24 12:18     ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-03  9:06     ` Li, Ming
2023-02-03  9:09       ` Li, Ming
2023-02-03 10:08       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 22:03     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] PCI/DOE: Create mailboxes on device enumeration Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24  1:14   ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 12:21   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-23 10:18 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] cxl/pci: Use CDAT DOE mailbox created by PCI core Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24  1:18   ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 12:25   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] PCI/DOE: Make mailbox creation API private Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24  1:25   ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-24 12:26   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-23 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] PCI/DOE: Relax restrictions on request and response size Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 22:29   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-24  1:43   ` Ira Weiny
2023-02-10 21:47     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-24 12:43   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-01-24 23:51     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-25  9:47       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 22:10       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-01-23 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Collection of DOE material Bjorn Helgaas
2023-02-10 21:39   ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11  0:04     ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3359d431-6ad1-8577-6f16-cdc17da5fe42@intel.com \
    --to=ming4.li@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox