From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: John Groves <john@jagalactic.com>, John Groves <John@Groves.net>,
Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>
Cc: John Groves <jgroves@micron.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/9] dax/fsdev: use __va(phys) for kaddr in direct_access
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 16:24:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39570927-b4f8-41e2-816b-e8a0a30abf2b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0100019e79cbe087-d11f77a7-379f-4355-b65c-52b3090e9ddd-000000@email.amazonses.com>
On 5/30/26 9:51 AM, John Groves wrote:
> From: John Groves <John@Groves.net>
>
> Use __va(phys) instead of virt_addr + linear_offset for the kaddr
> return in __fsdev_dax_direct_access(). The previous code added a
> device-linear byte offset to virt_addr (which is __va of ranges[0]),
> but for multi-range devices with physical gaps between ranges, this
> linear arithmetic crosses the gap and produces a wrong kernel virtual
> address. Using __va(phys) where phys comes from dax_pgoff_to_phys()
> is correct for any range layout because the direct map translates
> each physical address independently.
>
> Fixes: 759455848df0b ("dax: Save the kva from memremap")
> Signed-off-by: John Groves <john@groves.net>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
one comment below
> ---
> drivers/dax/fsdev.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> index 42aac7e952516..a2d2eb20fb4d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/fsdev.c
> @@ -51,9 +51,7 @@ static long __fsdev_dax_direct_access(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff,
> struct dev_dax *dev_dax = dax_get_private(dax_dev);
> size_t size = nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> size_t offset = pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
> - void *virt_addr = dev_dax->virt_addr + offset;
With this change, there's no more dev_dax->virt_addr usage? Should that be removed?
DJ
> phys_addr_t phys;
> - unsigned long local_pfn;
>
> phys = dax_pgoff_to_phys(dev_dax, pgoff, size);
> if (phys == -1) {
> @@ -63,11 +61,10 @@ static long __fsdev_dax_direct_access(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff,
> }
>
> if (kaddr)
> - *kaddr = virt_addr;
> + *kaddr = __va(phys);
>
> - local_pfn = PHYS_PFN(phys);
> if (pfn)
> - *pfn = local_pfn;
> + *pfn = PHYS_PFN(phys);
>
> /*
> * Use cached_size which was computed at probe time. The size cannot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260530164953.6578-1-john@jagalactic.com>
2026-05-30 16:50 ` [PATCH V3 0/9] Fixes to the previously-merged drivers/dax/fsdev series John Groves
2026-05-30 16:50 ` [PATCH V3 1/9] dax: fix misleading comment about share/index union in dax_folio_reset_order() John Groves
2026-06-01 21:51 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-03 0:12 ` Alison Schofield
2026-05-30 16:50 ` [PATCH V3 2/9] dax/fsdev: fix multi-range offset in memory_failure handler John Groves
2026-05-30 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-03 0:12 ` Alison Schofield
2026-06-03 0:17 ` Dave Jiang
2026-05-30 16:50 ` [PATCH V3 3/9] dax/fsdev: clear vmemmap_shift when binding static pgmap John Groves
2026-05-30 17:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-01 22:06 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-03 0:13 ` Alison Schofield
2026-05-30 16:50 ` [PATCH V3 4/9] dax/fsdev: clear dev_dax->pgmap on probe failure John Groves
2026-05-30 17:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-01 23:10 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-03 0:14 ` Alison Schofield
2026-05-30 16:51 ` [PATCH V3 5/9] dax/fsdev: use __va(phys) for kaddr in direct_access John Groves
2026-05-30 17:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-01 23:24 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2026-06-03 0:14 ` Alison Schofield
2026-05-30 16:51 ` [PATCH V3 6/9] dax/fsdev: fail probe on invalid pgmap offset John Groves
2026-05-30 17:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-03 0:15 ` Alison Schofield
2026-05-30 16:51 ` [PATCH V3 7/9] dax: fix holder_ops race in fs_put_dax() John Groves
2026-05-30 18:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-02 0:03 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-07 15:37 ` John Groves
2026-05-30 16:51 ` [PATCH V3 8/9] dax: replace exported dax_dev_get() with non-allocating dax_dev_find() John Groves
2026-05-30 18:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-02 0:13 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-03 0:15 ` Alison Schofield
2026-05-30 16:51 ` [PATCH V3 9/9] dax: fsdev.c minor formatting cleanup John Groves
2026-06-03 0:16 ` Alison Schofield
2026-06-03 0:11 ` [PATCH V3 0/9] Fixes to the previously-merged drivers/dax/fsdev series Alison Schofield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39570927-b4f8-41e2-816b-e8a0a30abf2b@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=John@Groves.net \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jgroves@micron.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=john@jagalactic.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox