From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5268A210FB; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 12:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729253392; cv=none; b=B6V6oZ1LL1Wi3e7y63BxjQ3o7h0Mxtz+ipmwAswaWkbGelcmtW1p62o4n4nf1jgYiL53e7eCUT0/a3VYq8AtSs4x27hcZ4+XLRPEpi+a7rYG+McIRXS/iq9eDGu3UA0XH1QTP7SbaoMP4kIN+CamnaPwIVXVJuIPaglae/AoH6c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729253392; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z6IY0WLrQ+mbUTBQmT45upWo6R76pXinWA8IODszsrk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=aKkm6+phAs7y4kVkh1quc/54oPsy04Mh1AIu0GdUh2LnTo4vvTlkGF2Esc1a/W+6+uumwEJP0tWkOdlPCvXm/MzfwUJkmG+DVHBCrQRrKPWu//kClqeiltVZrB6Z+PLg880wDS1LXoDG6rUeQYeJ4dhDQNK2F8mfxOMc6JBeb6c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XVNlz0vkNz6HJjB; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:09:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml100008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.131]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D7A21400F4; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:09:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.172) by frapeml100008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 14:09:45 +0200 Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) by frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.039; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 14:09:45 +0200 From: Shiju Jose To: Jonathan Cameron CC: "dave.jiang@intel.com" , "dan.j.williams@intel.com" , "alison.schofield@intel.com" , "vishal.l.verma@intel.com" , "ira.weiny@intel.com" , "dave@stgolabs.net" , "linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linuxarm , tanxiaofei , "Zengtao (B)" Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Updates for CXL Event Records Thread-Topic: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Updates for CXL Event Records Thread-Index: AQHbH+k/0+IXcnhOQkao9dWzrwOFcLKMOZUAgAAzP8A= Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 12:09:45 +0000 Message-ID: <5ca992144d644d2b88feb89c8fb5eabd@huawei.com> References: <20241016163349.1210-1-shiju.jose@huawei.com> <20241018120414.00006c61@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20241018120414.00006c61@Huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 >-----Original Message----- >From: Jonathan Cameron >Sent: 18 October 2024 12:04 >To: Shiju Jose >Cc: dave.jiang@intel.com; dan.j.williams@intel.com; alison.schofield@intel= .com; >vishal.l.verma@intel.com; ira.weiny@intel.com; dave@stgolabs.net; linux- >cxl@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Linuxarm >; tanxiaofei ; Zengtao (B) > >Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Updates for CXL Event Records > >On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 17:33:45 +0100 > wrote: > >> From: Shiju Jose >> >> CXL spec rev 3.1 CXL Event Records has updated w.r.t CXL spec rev 3.0. >> Add updates for the above spec changes in the CXL events records and >> CXL trace events implementation. >> >> Note: Please apply following fix patch first if not present. >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/cxl/patch/20241014143003.1170-1-s >> hiju.jose@huawei.com/ >> >> Shiju Jose (4): >> cxl/events: Updates for CXL Common Event Record Format >> cxl/events: Updates for CXL General Media Event Record >> cxl/events: Updates for CXL DRAM Event Record >> cxl/events: Updates for CXL Memory Module Event Record >> >> drivers/cxl/core/trace.h | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> include/cxl/event.h | 20 +++- >> 2 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) >> > >Hi Shiju, > >Why are these an RFC? Seem in a good state to me and the questions I'm se= eing >are naming stuff that to me doesn't justify RFC status. > >Jonathan Hi Jonathan, I add RFC since it is v1. I will exclude RFC in v2. =20 Thanks, Shiju