From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] cxl/pci: Cleanup 'sanitize' to always poll
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:55:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <651cb81049601_ae7e729466@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231002110225.00000e61@Huawei.com>
Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 16:09:39 -0700
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > In preparation for fixing the init/teardown of the 'sanitize' workqueue
> > and sysfs notification mechanism, arrange for cxl_mbox_sanitize_work()
> > to be the single location where the sysfs attribute is notified. With
> > that change there is no distinction between polled mode and interrupt
> > mode. All the interrupt does is accelerate the polling interval.
> >
> > The change to check for "mds->security.sanitize_node" under the lock is
> > there to ensure that the interrupt, the work routine and the
> > setup/teardown code can all have a consistent view of the registered
> > notifier and the workqueue state. I.e. the expectation is that the
> > interrupt is live past the point that the sanitize sysfs attribute is
> > published, and it may race teardown, so it must be consulted under a
> > lock.
> >
> > Lastly, some opportunistic replacements of
> > "queue_delayed_work(system_wq, ...)", which is just open coded
> > schedule_delayed_work(), are included.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> One trivial comment inline, otherwise looks fine to me
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 3 +-
> > drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h | 2 --
> > drivers/cxl/pci.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> > index 14b547c07f54..2a7a07f6d165 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> > @@ -561,8 +561,7 @@ static void cxl_memdev_security_shutdown(struct device *dev)
> > struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = to_cxl_memdev(dev);
> > struct cxl_memdev_state *mds = to_cxl_memdev_state(cxlmd->cxlds);
> >
> > - if (mds->security.poll)
> > - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&mds->security.poll_dwork);
> > + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&mds->security.poll_dwork);
> > }
> >
> > static void cxl_memdev_shutdown(struct device *dev)
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> > index 706f8a6d1ef4..55f00ad17a77 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> > @@ -360,7 +360,6 @@ struct cxl_fw_state {
> > *
> > * @state: state of last security operation
> > * @enabled_cmds: All security commands enabled in the CEL
> > - * @poll: polling for sanitization is enabled, device has no mbox irq support
> > * @poll_tmo_secs: polling timeout
> > * @poll_dwork: polling work item
> > * @sanitize_node: sanitation sysfs file to notify
> > @@ -368,7 +367,6 @@ struct cxl_fw_state {
> > struct cxl_security_state {
> > unsigned long state;
> > DECLARE_BITMAP(enabled_cmds, CXL_SEC_ENABLED_MAX);
> > - bool poll;
> > int poll_tmo_secs;
> > struct delayed_work poll_dwork;
> > struct kernfs_node *sanitize_node;
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > index aa1b3dd9e64c..ac4e434b0806 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> > @@ -128,10 +128,10 @@ static irqreturn_t cxl_pci_mbox_irq(int irq, void *id)
> > reg = readq(cxlds->regs.mbox + CXLDEV_MBOX_BG_CMD_STATUS_OFFSET);
> > opcode = FIELD_GET(CXLDEV_MBOX_BG_CMD_COMMAND_OPCODE_MASK, reg);
> > if (opcode == CXL_MBOX_OP_SANITIZE) {
> > + mutex_lock(&mds->mbox_mutex);
> > if (mds->security.sanitize_node)
> > - sysfs_notify_dirent(mds->security.sanitize_node);
> > -
> > - dev_dbg(cxlds->dev, "Sanitization operation ended\n");
> > + mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &mds->security.poll_dwork, 0);
> > + mutex_unlock(&mds->mbox_mutex);
> > } else {
> > /* short-circuit the wait in __cxl_pci_mbox_send_cmd() */
> > rcuwait_wake_up(&mds->mbox_wait);
> > @@ -160,8 +160,7 @@ static void cxl_mbox_sanitize_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > int timeout = mds->security.poll_tmo_secs + 10;
> >
> > mds->security.poll_tmo_secs = min(15 * 60, timeout);
> > - queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &mds->security.poll_dwork,
> > - timeout * HZ);
> > + schedule_delayed_work(&mds->security.poll_dwork, timeout * HZ);
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&mds->mbox_mutex);
> > }
> > @@ -293,15 +292,11 @@ static int __cxl_pci_mbox_send_cmd(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
> > * and allow userspace to poll(2) for completion.
> > */
> > if (mbox_cmd->opcode == CXL_MBOX_OP_SANITIZE) {
> > - if (mds->security.poll) {
> > - /* give first timeout a second */
> > - timeout = 1;
> > - mds->security.poll_tmo_secs = timeout;
> > - queue_delayed_work(system_wq,
> > - &mds->security.poll_dwork,
> > - timeout * HZ);
> > - }
> > -
> > + /* give first timeout a second */
> > + timeout = 1;
> > + mds->security.poll_tmo_secs = timeout;
> > + schedule_delayed_work(&mds->security.poll_dwork,
> > + timeout * HZ);
> > dev_dbg(dev, "Sanitization operation started\n");
> > goto success;
> > }
> > @@ -384,7 +379,9 @@ static int cxl_pci_setup_mailbox(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds)
> > const int cap = readl(cxlds->regs.mbox + CXLDEV_MBOX_CAPS_OFFSET);
> > struct device *dev = cxlds->dev;
> > unsigned long timeout;
> > + int irq, msgnum;
> > u64 md_status;
> > + u32 ctrl;
> >
> > timeout = jiffies + mbox_ready_timeout * HZ;
> > do {
> > @@ -432,33 +429,26 @@ static int cxl_pci_setup_mailbox(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds)
> > dev_dbg(dev, "Mailbox payload sized %zu", mds->payload_size);
> >
> > rcuwait_init(&mds->mbox_wait);
> > + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mds->security.poll_dwork, cxl_mbox_sanitize_work);
> >
> > - if (cap & CXLDEV_MBOX_CAP_BG_CMD_IRQ) {
> > - u32 ctrl;
> > - int irq, msgnum;
> > - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
> > -
> > - msgnum = FIELD_GET(CXLDEV_MBOX_CAP_IRQ_MSGNUM_MASK, cap);
> > - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, msgnum);
> > - if (irq < 0)
> > - goto mbox_poll;
> > -
> > - if (cxl_request_irq(cxlds, irq, cxl_pci_mbox_irq, NULL))
> > - goto mbox_poll;
> > + /* background command interrupts are optional */
> > + if ((cap & CXLDEV_MBOX_CAP_BG_CMD_IRQ) == 0)
>
> Nit, but it's a boolean flag, so to me
> if (!(cap & CXLDEV_MBOX_CAP_BG_CMD_IRQ))
>
> feels slightly better.
>
> There are instances of this done with !() elsewhere in the file,
> so not obviously a case of wanting to match local style.
Ok.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-04 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-29 23:09 [PATCH v2 0/4] cxl/mem: Fix shutdown order Dan Williams
2023-09-29 23:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary device reference management in sanitize work Dan Williams
2023-09-29 23:41 ` Ira Weiny
2023-10-02 9:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-02 15:27 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-10-02 16:48 ` Dave Jiang
2023-09-29 23:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] cxl/pci: Cleanup 'sanitize' to always poll Dan Williams
2023-09-29 23:49 ` Ira Weiny
2023-09-29 23:51 ` Ira Weiny
2023-10-02 10:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-04 0:55 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2023-10-02 15:49 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-10-04 1:01 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-04 1:13 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-10-02 16:57 ` Dave Jiang
2023-09-29 23:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cxl/pci: Fix sanitize notifier setup Dan Williams
2023-09-30 2:42 ` Ira Weiny
2023-10-02 10:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-04 0:59 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-04 10:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-04 18:47 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-02 16:59 ` Dave Jiang
2023-10-04 0:52 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-10-04 1:09 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-04 16:21 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-10-04 18:48 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-04 18:50 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-04 18:54 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-04 19:23 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-09-29 23:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] cxl/mem: Fix shutdown order Dan Williams
2023-09-29 23:52 ` Ira Weiny
2023-10-02 10:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-02 16:59 ` Dave Jiang
2023-10-03 17:40 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=651cb81049601_ae7e729466@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox