Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] cxl/memdev: Fix sanitize vs decoder setup locking
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 11:18:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <652444042bd98_ae7e7294ad@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65237eded9811_1d988429470@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>

Ira Weiny wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > The sanitize operation is destructive and the expectation is that the
> > device is unmapped while in progress. The current implementation does a
> > lockless check for decoders being active, but then does nothing to
> > prevent decoders from racing to be committed. Introduce state tracking
> > to resolve this race.
> > 
> > This incidentally cleans up unpriveleged userspace from triggering mmio
> > read cycles by spinning on reading the 'securiry/state' attribute. Which
> > at a minimum is a waste since the kernel state machine can cache the
> > completion result.
> > 
> > Lastly cxl_mem_sanitize() was mistakenly marked EXPORT_SYMBOL() in the
> > original implementation, but an export was never required.
> > 
> > Fixes: 0c36b6ad436a ("cxl/mbox: Add sanitization handling machinery")
> > Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > ---
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> > @@ -650,6 +650,25 @@ static int cxl_decoder_commit(struct cxl_decoder *cxld)
> >  		return -EBUSY;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * For endpoint decoders hosted on CXL memory devices that
> > +	 * support the sanitize operation, make sure sanitize is not in-flight.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (is_endpoint_decoder(&cxld->dev)) {
> > +		struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled =
> > +			to_cxl_endpoint_decoder(&cxld->dev);
> > +		struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = cxled_to_memdev(cxled);
> > +		struct cxl_memdev_state *mds =
> > +			to_cxl_memdev_state(cxlmd->cxlds);
> > +
> > +		if (mds && mds->security.sanitize_active) {
> 
> I'm curious why this check does not need to hold the mds->mbox_mutex?  Or
> how this may be protected by the cxl_dpa_rwsem?

...because cxl_decoder_commit() knows it is holding the cxl_dpa_rwsem for
write which means that sanitize_active can not transition from false to
true in cxl_mem_sanitize().

It does mean that in-flight completions may race, but that's a benign race
where whatever triggered cxl_decoder_commit() is already in the position of
needing to wait for cxl_mbox_sanitize_work() to fire.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-09 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-06  7:25 [PATCH v3 00/10] cxl/mem: Fix shutdown order Dan Williams
2023-10-06  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary device reference management in sanitize work Dan Williams
2023-10-06  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] cxl/pci: Cleanup 'sanitize' to always poll Dan Williams
2023-10-09 17:19   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-10-09 18:39     ` Dan Williams
2023-10-09 20:48       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-10-06  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] cxl/pci: Remove hardirq handler for cxl_request_irq() Dan Williams
2023-10-06 22:06   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-10-09  3:29   ` Ira Weiny
2023-10-09 16:36   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-13 16:59   ` Dave Jiang
2023-10-06  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] cxl/pci: Remove inconsistent usage of dev_err_probe() Dan Williams
2023-10-06 22:10   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-10-09  3:42   ` Ira Weiny
2023-10-09 16:38   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-13 17:09   ` Dave Jiang
2023-10-06  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] cxl/pci: Clarify devm host for memdev relative setup Dan Williams
2023-10-09  3:50   ` Ira Weiny
2023-10-09 16:41   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-13 17:12   ` Dave Jiang
2023-10-06  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] cxl/pci: Fix sanitize notifier setup Dan Williams
2023-10-09 16:42   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-09 18:08   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-10-06  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] cxl/memdev: Fix sanitize vs decoder setup locking Dan Williams
2023-10-06 10:10   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-09  4:17   ` Ira Weiny
2023-10-09 18:18     ` Dan Williams [this message]
2023-10-09 22:32       ` Dan Williams
2023-10-09 16:46   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-09 18:36     ` Dan Williams
2023-10-11 20:44       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-10 20:21   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-10-13 17:20   ` Dave Jiang
2023-10-06  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] cxl/mem: Fix shutdown order Dan Williams
2023-10-06  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] tools/testing/cxl: Make cxl_memdev_state available to other command emulation Dan Williams
2023-10-09  3:24   ` Ira Weiny
2023-10-13 17:21   ` Dave Jiang
2023-10-06  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] tools/testing/cxl: Add 'sanitize notifier' support Dan Williams
2023-10-09  4:25   ` Ira Weiny
2023-10-13 17:25   ` Dave Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=652444042bd98_ae7e7294ad@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox