From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Vishal Verma" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] cxl/region: Calculate a target position in a region interleave
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:18:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6539f68d9dc34_b8db294ac@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6539e07eab5a5_1894294b9@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>
Dan Williams wrote:
> alison.schofield@ wrote:
> > From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> >
> > Introduce a calculation to find a target's position in a region
> > interleave. Perform a self-test of the calculation on user-defined
> > regions.
> >
> > The region driver uses the kernel sort() function to put region
> > targets in relative order. Positions are assigned based on each
> > target's index in that sorted list. That relative sort doesn't
> > consider the offset of a port into its parent port which causes
> > some auto-discovered regions to fail creation. In one failure case,
> > a 2 + 2 config (2 host bridges each with 2 endpoints), the sort
> > puts all the targets of one port ahead of another port when they
> > were expected to be interleaved.
> >
> > In preparation for repairing the autodiscovery region assembly,
> > introduce a new method for discovering a target position in the
> > region interleave.
> >
> > cxl_calc_interleave_pos() adds a method to find the target position by
> > ascending from an endpoint to a root decoder. The calculation starts
> > with the endpoint's local position and position in the parent port. It
> > traverses towards the root decoder and examines both position and ways
> > in order to allow the position to be refined all the way to the root
> > decoder.
> >
> > This calculation: position = position * parent_ways + parent_pos;
> > applied iteratively yields the correct position.
> >
> > Include a self-test that exercises this new position calculation against
> > every successfully configured user-defined region.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> > ---
> [..]
> > +/**
> > + * cxl_calc_interleave_pos() - calculate an endpoint position in a region
> > + * @cxled: the endpoint decoder
> > + *
> > + * The endpoint position is calculated by traversing from the endpoint to
> > + * the root decoder and iteratively applying this calculation:
> > + * position = position * parent_ways + parent_pos;
> > + *
> > + * For example, the expected interleave order of the 4-way region shown
> > + * below is: mem0, mem2, mem1, mem3
> > + *
> > + * root_port
> > + * / \
> > + * host_bridge_0 host_bridge_1
> > + * | | | |
> > + * mem0 mem1 mem2 mem3
> > + *
> > + * In the example the calculator will iterate twice. The first iteration
> > + * uses the mem position in the host-bridge and the ways of the host-
> > + * bridge to generate the first, or local, position. The second iteration
> > + * uses the host-bridge position in the root_port and the ways of the
> > + * root_port to refine the position.
> > + *
> > + * A trace of the calculation per endpoint looks like this:
> > + * mem0: pos = 0 * 2 + 0 mem2: pos = 0 * 2 + 0
> > + * pos = 0 * 2 + 0 pos = 0 * 2 + 1
> > + * pos: 0 pos: 1
> > + *
> > + * mem1: pos = 0 * 2 + 1 mem3: pos = 0 * 2 + 1
> > + * pos = 1 * 2 + 0 pos = 1 * 2 + 1
> > + * pos: 2 pos = 3
> > + *
> > + * Note that while this example is simple, the method applies to more
> > + * complex topologies, including those with switches.
> > + *
> > + * Return: position >= 0 on success
> > + * -ENXIO on failure
> > + */
> > +
> > +static int cxl_calc_interleave_pos(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled)
> > +{
>
> This needed a minor fixup for the RCD case, since RCDs are directly
> integrated into the CXL-root with no intervening ports. I went ahead and
> rolled this hunk:
Nope, that hunk was broken and did not fix the issue, but the below
does. The reason this was triggering on the RCH region test was due to
the fact that cxl_test defines a sub-window size region to
auto-assemble.
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
index dbaea89dfa4d..6f8a50bf6201 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
@@ -1500,6 +1500,8 @@ static int match_switch_decoder_by_range(struct device *dev, void *data)
cxlsd = to_cxl_switch_decoder(dev);
r1 = &cxlsd->cxld.hpa_range;
+ if (is_root_decoder(dev))
+ return range_contains(r1, r2);
return (r1->start == r2->start && r1->end == r2->end);
}
I'll fold this into patch1. The root-decoders are a super-set of
switch-decoders and the range they cover is a super-set of the region
range.
The failure mode could intermittently trigger a crash which I need to
debug, but I am fairly certain it was due to causing auto-assembly to
fail in an awkward place:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5ab2: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 23 PID: 1468 Comm: cxl Tainted: G OE N 6.6.0-rc3+ #1120
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS edk2-20230524-3.fc38 05/24/2023
RIP: 0010:to_cxl_port+0x8/0x60 [cxl_core]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? die_addr+0x32/0x80
? exc_general_protection+0x19b/0x450
? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x30
? to_cxl_port+0x8/0x60 [cxl_core]
cxl_region_detach+0x19/0x210 [cxl_core]
detach_target.part.0+0x29/0x80 [cxl_core]
unregister_region+0x42/0x70 [cxl_core]
devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110
device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70
device_release_driver_internal+0x1d2/0x210
unbind_store+0x9d/0xb0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-26 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-25 20:01 [PATCH v4 0/3] cxl/region: Autodiscovery position repair alison.schofield
2023-10-25 20:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] cxl/region: Prepare the decoder match range helper for reuse alison.schofield
2023-10-25 20:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] cxl/region: Calculate a target position in a region interleave alison.schofield
2023-10-26 3:43 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-26 5:18 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2023-10-27 19:39 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-25 20:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] cxl/region: Use cxl_calc_interleave_pos() for auto-discovery alison.schofield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6539f68d9dc34_b8db294ac@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox