From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
<dave@stgolabs.net>, <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
<vishal.l.verma@intel.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl: Add cxl_region_rwsem around commit_end write during decoder enumeration
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 14:38:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <654d5f7285171_af98d2949e@iweiny-mobl.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <169948110840.509375.13862681045079385425.stgit@djiang5-mobl3>
Dave Jiang wrote:
> init_hdm_decoder() modifies port->commit_end without taking the
> cxl_region_rwsem. An assert splat emitted by cxl_num_decoders_committed().
> However looking at the code, it looks like the write version of the rwsem
> needs to be taken due to the modification of commit_end. Wrap the write
> version of the rwsem around reading and writing of commit_end.
>
> Fixes: 176baefb2eb5 ("cxl/hdm: Commit decoder state to hardware")
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> index bc8ad4a8afca..a8f960c496cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
> @@ -854,10 +854,12 @@ static int init_hdm_decoder(struct cxl_port *port, struct cxl_decoder *cxld,
> cxld->target_type = CXL_DECODER_HOSTONLYMEM;
> else
> cxld->target_type = CXL_DECODER_DEVMEM;
> + down_write(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> if (cxld->id != cxl_num_decoders_committed(port)) {
> dev_warn(&port->dev,
> "decoder%d.%d: Committed out of order\n",
> port->id, cxld->id);
> + up_write(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> @@ -865,9 +867,11 @@ static int init_hdm_decoder(struct cxl_port *port, struct cxl_decoder *cxld,
> dev_warn(&port->dev,
> "decoder%d.%d: Committed with zero size\n",
> port->id, cxld->id);
> + up_write(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> return -ENXIO;
> }
> port->commit_end = cxld->id;
> + up_write(&cxl_region_rwsem);
> } else {
> if (cxled) {
> struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = cxled_to_memdev(cxled);
>
>
This part of the patch seemed unbalanced to me. Looking at the check for size
== 0 I feel like it would be better to do that check first outside of the lock.
Something like below.
Ira
14:36:11 > git di --patience
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
index 1cc9be85ba4c..370ba5e39363 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
@@ -839,12 +839,6 @@ static int init_hdm_decoder(struct cxl_port *port, struct cxl_decoder *cxld,
cxld->target_type = CXL_DECODER_HOSTONLYMEM;
else
cxld->target_type = CXL_DECODER_DEVMEM;
- if (cxld->id != cxl_num_decoders_committed(port)) {
- dev_warn(&port->dev,
- "decoder%d.%d: Committed out of order\n",
- port->id, cxld->id);
- return -ENXIO;
- }
if (size == 0) {
dev_warn(&port->dev,
@@ -852,7 +846,17 @@ static int init_hdm_decoder(struct cxl_port *port, struct cxl_decoder *cxld,
port->id, cxld->id);
return -ENXIO;
}
+
+ down_write(&cxl_region_rwsem);
+ if (cxld->id != cxl_num_decoders_committed(port)) {
+ dev_warn(&port->dev,
+ "decoder%d.%d: Committed out of order\n",
+ port->id, cxld->id);
+ up_write(&cxl_region_rwsem);
+ return -ENXIO;
+ }
port->commit_end = cxld->id;
+ up_write(&cxl_region_rwsem);
} else {
if (cxled) {
struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = cxled_to_memdev(cxled);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-09 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-08 22:05 [PATCH] cxl: Add cxl_region_rwsem around commit_end write during decoder enumeration Dave Jiang
2023-11-09 19:58 ` fan
2023-11-10 23:12 ` Dan Williams
2023-11-09 22:38 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2023-11-10 20:21 ` Dan Williams
2023-11-15 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-15 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-15 16:01 ` Dan Williams
2023-11-15 19:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=654d5f7285171_af98d2949e@iweiny-mobl.notmuch \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox