RE: [RFC] Do we need dedicated LSF/MM/BPF 2024 session for CXL memory?

[Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>]

Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Do we need dedicated LSF/MM/BPF 2024 session for CXL memory?

Last year we handled this on the fly in terms of identifying topics that
have the highest level of cross appeal with core-mm folks. My
observation is that some of the sessions were useful for the "mm" track,
like tiering policy and ABI, while other topics were likely more
suitable for the "storage" track, like fabric manager topics.

I expect to do the same this year and not have a dedicated CXL session.
I.e. prefer CXL topics that intersect mm-policy or ABI for the "mm"
track and find a space for the more hardware-centric topics on an as
needed basis.