Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	<vishal.l.verma@intel.com>, <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	<bhelgaas@google.com>, <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: Add check for CXL Secondary Bus Reset
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:56:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6615c78761bce_24596294cb@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240409160256.94184-3-dave.jiang@intel.com>

Dave Jiang wrote:
> Per CXL spec r3.1 8.1.5.2, Secondary Bus Reset (SBR) is masked unless the
> "Unmask SBR" bit is set. Add a check to the PCI secondary bus reset
> path to fail the CXL SBR request if the "Unmask SBR" bit is clear in
> the CXL Port Control Extensions register by returning -ENOTTY.
> 
> When the "Unmask SBR" bit is set to 0 (default), the bus_reset would

Feels like a missing "Otherwise," at the beginning of this sentence to
indicate transition from what the patch does to what happens without the
patch.

> appear to have executed successfully. However the operation is actually
> masked. The intention is to inform the user that SBR for the CXL device
> is masked and will not go through.
> 
> If the "Unmask SBR" bit is set to 1, then the bus reset will execute
> successfully.

Otherwise, heh heh heh, you can add:

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

...I would say, do not spin the patch just for that small fixup.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-09 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-09 16:01 [PATCH 0/4 v4] PCI: Add Secondary Bus Reset (SBR) support for CXL Dave Jiang
2024-04-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] PCI/cxl: Move PCI CXL vendor Id to a common location from CXL subsystem Dave Jiang
2024-04-09 21:28   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-04-09 22:51   ` Dan Williams
2024-04-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: Add check for CXL Secondary Bus Reset Dave Jiang
2024-04-09 21:39   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-04-09 21:56     ` Dave Jiang
2024-04-11  2:33       ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-04-09 22:56   ` Dan Williams [this message]
2024-04-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: Create new reset method to force SBR for CXL Dave Jiang
2024-04-26 19:46   ` Dan Williams
2024-04-27  6:19     ` Lukas Wunner
2024-04-27 17:07       ` Dan Williams
2024-04-09 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] cxl: Add post reset warning if reset results in loss of previously committed HDM decoders Dave Jiang
2024-04-26 20:03   ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6615c78761bce_24596294cb@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox