Re: [PATCH v16 01/10] PCI/AER: Introduce AER-CXL Kfifo

[Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>]

Dan Williams wrote:
[..]
> I just realized that this reacquires the semaphore on every invocation,
> and leaks stranded references.

Terry, while I think this issue is significant I think we have passed
the point of utility of continuing to spin this series. Specifically we
have general agreement about the approach and the issues being found at
this point are no worse than the maintenance fixes occurring on the
already upstream CXL infrastructure. My proposal is apply this v16 to a
for-7.1/cxl-aer topic branch and start submitting submitting fixes on
top of that.

If that topic is merged for v7.1, great*. If not the commit ids can be
stablized and a for-7.2/cxl-aer topic branch can start up from something
like:

    git checkout -b for-7.2/cxl-aer v7.1-rc1 && git merge for-7.1/cxl-aer

* The primary merge blocker question for me is whether PCI core agrees
to the proposal that CXL AER requires 'struct cxl_port' objects and
forwarding notifications from the built-in PCI AER driver to the modular
CXL core.