Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] acpi/ghes, cxl: Refactor work registration functions to support multiple workqueues

[Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>]

On 11/26/2024 7:57 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:39:13 +0000
> Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com> wrote:
> 
>> Refactor the work registration and unregistration functions in GHES to
>> enable reuse across different workqueues. This update lays the foundation
>> for integrating additional workqueues in the CXL subsystem for better
>> modularity and code reuse.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> index 082c409707ba..62ffe6eb5503 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> @@ -717,26 +717,42 @@ static void cxl_cper_post_event(enum cxl_event_type event_type,
>>   	schedule_work(cxl_cper_work);
>>   }
>>   
>> -int cxl_cper_register_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +static int cxl_cper_register_work(struct work_struct **work_ptr,
>> +				  spinlock_t *lock,
>> +				  struct work_struct *work)
> 
> This is a somewhat strange interface.  It doesn't
> really do anything particularly useful. I'd be tempted to
> just open code this at each call site.

Okay I will change.
> 
> 
>>   {
>> -	if (cxl_cper_work)
>> +	if (*work_ptr)
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   
>> -	guard(spinlock)(&cxl_cper_work_lock);
>> -	cxl_cper_work = work;
>> +	guard(spinlock)(lock);
>> +	*work_ptr = work;
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_cper_register_event_work, CXL);
>>   
>> -int cxl_cper_unregister_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +static int cxl_cper_unregister_work(struct work_struct **work_ptr,
>> +				    spinlock_t *lock,
>> +				    struct work_struct *work)
>>   {
>> -	if (cxl_cper_work != work)
>> +	if (*work_ptr != work)
> As above.
okay.

Thanks
Smita
> 
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   
>> -	guard(spinlock)(&cxl_cper_work_lock);
>> -	cxl_cper_work = NULL;
>> +	guard(spinlock)(lock);
>> +	*work_ptr = NULL;
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> +
>> +int cxl_cper_register_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +	return cxl_cper_register_work(&cxl_cper_work, &cxl_cper_work_lock,
>> +				      work);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_cper_register_event_work, CXL);
>> +
>> +int cxl_cper_unregister_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +	return cxl_cper_unregister_work(&cxl_cper_work, &cxl_cper_work_lock,
>> +					work);
>> +}
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_cper_unregister_event_work, CXL);
>>   
>>   int cxl_cper_kfifo_get(struct cxl_cper_work_data *wd)
>