Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com
Cc: a.manzanares@samsung.com, vishak.g@samsung.com, neeraj.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 11/17] cxl/region: Add devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() for pmem region creation
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:33:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80883937-a993-4f73-b719-18ec9a06014e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251119075255.2637388-12-s.neeraj@samsung.com>



On 11/19/25 12:52 AM, Neeraj Kumar wrote:
> devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() is used to create cxl region based on region
> information scanned from LSA.
> 
> devm_cxl_add_region() is used to just allocate cxlr and its fields are
> filled later by userspace tool using device attributes (*_store()).
> 
> Inspiration for devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() is taken from these device
> attributes (_store*) calls. It allocates cxlr and fills information
> parsed from LSA and calls device_add(&cxlr->dev) to initiate further
> region creation porbes
> 
> Rename __create_region() to cxl_create_region(), which will be used
> in later patch to create cxl region after fetching region information
> from LSA.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>

small comment below, otherwise
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/core.h   |  12 ++++
>  drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> index 1fb66132b777..fde96507cb75 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/core.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ int cxl_get_poison_by_endpoint(struct cxl_port *port);
>  struct cxl_region *cxl_dpa_to_region(const struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 dpa);
>  u64 cxl_dpa_to_hpa(struct cxl_region *cxlr, const struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd,
>  		   u64 dpa);
> +struct cxl_region *cxl_create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> +				     enum cxl_partition_mode mode, int id,
> +				     struct cxl_pmem_region_params *params,
> +				     struct cxl_decoder *cxld);
>  
>  #else
>  static inline u64 cxl_dpa_to_hpa(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
> @@ -71,6 +75,14 @@ static inline int cxl_region_init(void)
>  static inline void cxl_region_exit(void)
>  {
>  }
> +static inline struct cxl_region *
> +cxl_create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> +		  enum cxl_partition_mode mode, int id,
> +		  struct cxl_pmem_region_params *params,
> +		  struct cxl_decoder *cxld)
> +{
> +	return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +}
>  #define CXL_REGION_ATTR(x) NULL
>  #define CXL_REGION_TYPE(x) NULL
>  #define SET_CXL_REGION_ATTR(x)
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index 3c868c4de4ec..06a75f0a8e9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -2618,6 +2618,114 @@ static struct cxl_region *devm_cxl_add_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
>  	return ERR_PTR(rc);
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t alloc_region_hpa(struct cxl_region *cxlr, u64 size)
> +{
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	ACQUIRE(rwsem_write_kill, rwsem)(&cxl_rwsem.region);
> +	if ((rc = ACQUIRE_ERR(rwsem_write_kill, &rwsem)))
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	if (!size)
> +		return -EINVAL;

Why not do this check before acquiring the lock?

DJ

> +
> +	return alloc_hpa(cxlr, size);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t alloc_region_dpa(struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled, u64 size)
> +{
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	if (!size)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(size, SZ_256M))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	rc = cxl_dpa_free(cxled);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	return cxl_dpa_alloc(cxled, size);
> +}
> +
> +static struct cxl_region *
> +devm_cxl_pmem_add_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd, int id,
> +			 struct cxl_pmem_region_params *params,
> +			 struct cxl_decoder *cxld,
> +			 enum cxl_decoder_type type)
> +{
> +	struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled;
> +	struct cxl_region_params *p;
> +	struct cxl_port *root_port;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	struct cxl_region *cxlr __free(put_cxl_region) =
> +		cxl_region_alloc(cxlrd, id);
> +	if (IS_ERR(cxlr))
> +		return cxlr;
> +
> +	cxlr->mode = CXL_PARTMODE_PMEM;
> +	cxlr->type = type;
> +
> +	dev = &cxlr->dev;
> +	rc = dev_set_name(dev, "region%d", id);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> +	p = &cxlr->params;
> +	p->uuid = params->uuid;
> +	p->interleave_ways = params->nlabel;
> +	p->interleave_granularity = params->ig;
> +
> +	rc = alloc_region_hpa(cxlr, params->rawsize);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> +	cxled = to_cxl_endpoint_decoder(&cxld->dev);
> +
> +	rc = cxl_dpa_set_part(cxled, CXL_PARTMODE_PMEM);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> +	rc = alloc_region_dpa(cxled, params->rawsize);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * TODO: Currently we have support of interleave_way == 1, where
> +	 * we can only have one region per mem device. It means mem device
> +	 * position (params->position) will always be 0. It is therefore
> +	 * attaching only one target at params->position
> +	 */
> +	if (params->position)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +
> +	rc = attach_target(cxlr, cxled, params->position, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> +	rc = __commit(cxlr);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> +	rc = device_add(dev);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> +	root_port = to_cxl_port(cxlrd->cxlsd.cxld.dev.parent);
> +	rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(root_port->uport_dev,
> +			unregister_region, cxlr);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return ERR_PTR(rc);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(root_port->uport_dev, "%s: created %s\n",
> +		dev_name(&cxlrd->cxlsd.cxld.dev), dev_name(dev));
> +
> +	return no_free_ptr(cxlr);
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t __create_region_show(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd, char *buf)
>  {
>  	return sysfs_emit(buf, "region%u\n", atomic_read(&cxlrd->region_id));
> @@ -2635,8 +2743,10 @@ static ssize_t create_ram_region_show(struct device *dev,
>  	return __create_region_show(to_cxl_root_decoder(dev), buf);
>  }
>  
> -static struct cxl_region *__create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> -					  enum cxl_partition_mode mode, int id)
> +struct cxl_region *cxl_create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> +				     enum cxl_partition_mode mode, int id,
> +				     struct cxl_pmem_region_params *pmem_params,
> +				     struct cxl_decoder *cxld)
>  {
>  	int rc;
>  
> @@ -2658,6 +2768,9 @@ static struct cxl_region *__create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (pmem_params)
> +		return devm_cxl_pmem_add_region(cxlrd, id, pmem_params, cxld,
> +						CXL_DECODER_HOSTONLYMEM);
>  	return devm_cxl_add_region(cxlrd, id, mode, CXL_DECODER_HOSTONLYMEM);
>  }
>  
> @@ -2672,7 +2785,7 @@ static ssize_t create_region_store(struct device *dev, const char *buf,
>  	if (rc != 1)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	cxlr = __create_region(cxlrd, mode, id);
> +	cxlr = cxl_create_region(cxlrd, mode, id, NULL, NULL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(cxlr))
>  		return PTR_ERR(cxlr);
>  
> @@ -3641,8 +3754,9 @@ static struct cxl_region *construct_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
>  	struct cxl_region *cxlr;
>  
>  	do {
> -		cxlr = __create_region(cxlrd, cxlds->part[part].mode,
> -				       atomic_read(&cxlrd->region_id));
> +		cxlr = cxl_create_region(cxlrd, cxlds->part[part].mode,
> +					 atomic_read(&cxlrd->region_id),
> +					 NULL, NULL);
>  	} while (IS_ERR(cxlr) && PTR_ERR(cxlr) == -EBUSY);
>  
>  	if (IS_ERR(cxlr)) {


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-19 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20251119075306epcas5p22a87515de65a3c668275b394cdea83b0@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2025-11-19  7:52 ` [PATCH V4 00/17] Add CXL LSA 2.1 format support in nvdimm and cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 01/17] nvdimm/label: Introduce NDD_REGION_LABELING flag to set region label Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 02/17] nvdimm/label: CXL labels skip the need for 'interleave-set cookie' Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 03/17] nvdimm/label: Add namespace/region label support as per LSA 2.1 Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 15:51     ` Dave Jiang
2026-01-09 11:46       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-12-17 14:31     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 11:51       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 04/17] nvdimm/label: Include region label in slot validation Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 16:54     ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 05/17] nvdimm/label: Skip region label during ns label DPA reservation Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 17:01     ` Dave Jiang
2025-12-17 14:33     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 11:53       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 06/17] nvdimm/label: Preserve region label during namespace creation Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 18:07     ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 07/17] nvdimm/label: Add region label delete support Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 19:50     ` Dave Jiang
2026-01-09 11:56       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-12-17 15:05     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 11:58       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 08/17] nvdimm/label: Preserve cxl region information from region label Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 20:13     ` Dave Jiang
2026-01-09 12:03       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-12-17 15:09     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 12:06       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 09/17] nvdimm/label: Export routine to fetch region information Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 20:18     ` Dave Jiang
2025-12-17 15:12     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 12:09       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 10/17] cxl/mem: Refactor cxl pmem region auto-assembling Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 20:44     ` Dave Jiang
2026-01-09 12:10       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 11/17] cxl/region: Add devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() for pmem region creation Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 21:33     ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2026-01-09 12:13       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-12-17 15:28     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 12:22       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 12/17] cxl/pmem: Preserve region information into nd_set Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 22:00     ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 13/17] cxl/pmem_region: Prep patch to accommodate pmem_region attributes Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 22:08     ` Dave Jiang
2025-12-17 15:35     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 12:26       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 14/17] cxl/pmem_region: Introduce CONFIG_CXL_PMEM_REGION for core/pmem_region.c Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 22:24     ` Dave Jiang
2025-12-17 15:38     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 12:29       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 15/17] cxl/pmem_region: Add sysfs attribute cxl region label updation/deletion Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 23:10     ` Dave Jiang
2026-01-09 12:31       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-12-17 15:40     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 12:32       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 16/17] cxl/pmem_region: Create pmem region using information parsed from LSA Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 23:37     ` Dave Jiang
2026-01-09 12:37       ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19  7:52   ` [PATCH V4 17/17] cxl/pmem: Add CXL LSA 2.1 support in cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2025-11-19 23:37     ` Dave Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80883937-a993-4f73-b719-18ec9a06014e@intel.com \
    --to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=s.neeraj@samsung.com \
    --cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox