From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59169C433F5 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242361AbiA0O3c (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:29:32 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49514 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242359AbiA0O3c (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:29:32 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF2A7C061714 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:29:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id bg19-20020a05600c3c9300b0034565e837b6so3392663wmb.1 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:29:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RicQOisaO04B9GBLBPS0jGWaeVqHqZaQe9mPCjO4FXI=; b=Vap2O54BFKTXQ4CV64PilR+EKDbadYgvJk7rtSaw1uQSBDnU1bjEJQrD5bX8pfwMBZ aBE6SWyNaTk0bHnJrbAjqYsqj+uAglJsq5E0RWsq3d5JD2HNWfolE8WHWMqR5r35vbPs ywDSegDysixIJjstEgKkhv42Sph/xyIlfvpxyBYOS+nl8QVnBwn1YZMTKhvHgThcZCOw fFwOwcFpzohyjlhA61fw4yUTYGmcOIu039ewv8i0vG6jFaOKrv3FGfYUp+O+veuMvQwA 1LChEO2GoiMZThF0zIepI6X/gPfrP1jr3pp+SX1N5g2YxlTCG05TliomILc4UEsGDz2f OJ3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RicQOisaO04B9GBLBPS0jGWaeVqHqZaQe9mPCjO4FXI=; b=VgUWvPj7DG2D/qTKGBe5AvSjcbp7VNpgMoNyvAfQiSE766GnTjzhia4QYN2MpGqjAv vbon1eYERz9owfIIMRXLllJBL86I7HWoCeINXiSIT7WncKBvhtcrcGBB2qkzYuutnmyL TIfopQwlvK8Pjmi42K7fGUTVsKExKvG1N6KnZNx5I1To+jOyqYgYXBLewEGZ6yXUVMhx 1srNa7yP2coO3RVsb9yBLVAh3N84zHs8TtRH1Dr4mCl9nfjxDgY3x7uO6hw1t9f/AqZr ZjDLiiWprNMgYMmUmg257pnwKIuOpdzq3G4RzxcshqMSBWbqbf1qKAf0XGR8w3mEwrgf v1dg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306z4kJxe86O8jCuZDRHTSBAcQVuWTpyNH5Dw4d/wx5j0hgqXHB 2CS3Wi/JsWjqwmur2gfCXRXOuw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxT9o6yEHtZkzPqNS2kWs8gjkwfalClUNDJP5093P+1RycF21QeT0Y101HSOeJhoNum580e8g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3d94:: with SMTP id bi20mr12024697wmb.14.1643293770277; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:29:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from zen.linaroharston ([51.148.130.216]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r12sm2211152wrw.73.2022.01.27.06.29.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 06:29:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E191FFB7; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:29:28 +0000 (GMT) References: <20220124171705.10432-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.7.6; emacs 28.0.91 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Marcel Apfelbaum , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Igor Mammedov , linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Ben Widawsky , Peter Maydell , linuxarm@huawei.com, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Saransh Gupta1 , Shreyas Shah , Chris Browy , Samarth Saxena , Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/42] CXl 2.0 emulation Support Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:22:52 +0000 In-reply-to: <20220124171705.10432-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Message-ID: <87sft98d6f.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Cameron writes: > Previous version was RFC v3: CXL 2.0 Support. > No longer an RFC as I would consider the vast majority of this > to be ready for detailed review. There are still questions called > out in some patches however. I've been through and added comments through the first half of the patches. I'll see if I can get to the second half next week however if you beat me to it with a re-rev I expect some ripples from the requested changes. Aside from ensuring the rest of the builds work: https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/pipelines/456700583/failures =20=20 it looks pretty good to me. I await the next version ;-) --=20 Alex Benn=C3=A9e