From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
dave.jiang@intel.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
dave@stgolabs.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
benjamin.cheatham@amd.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: cxl/region.c improvements and DAX/Hotplug plumbing
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 20:35:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <96a0e49e-4b35-4e6c-a3f2-70891213db18@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abwS5BK0erHVkKKH@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>
On 3/19/26 16:14, Gregory Price wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 09:53:05AM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>>> and would change the sysfs pattern to
>>> echo regionN > cxl/decoder0.0/create_ram_region
>>> echo regionN > cxl/drivers/sysram_region/bind
>>> echo online_movable > cxl/devices/dax_regionN/hotplug
>>> echo dax_regionN > cxl/drivers/dax_region/bind
>>>
>>> and gives the user a chance to configure a policy before the region
>>> is pumped all the way through to the endpoint dax driver.
>>
>> Would that still be backwards-compatible?
>>
>
> I've since squared this away with the CXL groups, the answer is a
> different probe path and leaving the auto-probe logic alone.
>
> I still need to re-submit the /hotplug extensions here as an improvement
> because its useful - but i've cleaned it up considerably to avoid the
> cross-subsystem nonsense.
>
>>>
>>> For most use-cases yes. For something like FAMFS (distributed shared
>>> memory), one system onlining a block as kmem could be potentially
>>> destructive to an entirely separate physical server.
>>
>> Right. But shouldn't we fail this already at the add_memory() stage?
>> Sounds like during onlining is a bit too late. Conceptually, the hotplug
>> as sysram was already wrong for famfs, or am I wrong?
>>
>
> Mostly this describes the baggage associated with auto-hotplug path for
> all CXL memory, and the fact that we only have a global-scope auto MHP
> tag. I've come around to better solutions to this problem.
I'm curious :)
>
> Thanks for the read n_n
Sorry again for the late reply.
--
Cheers,
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-21 19:38 cxl/region.c improvements and DAX/Hotplug plumbing Gregory Price
2026-01-22 16:28 ` Gregory Price
2026-01-22 22:14 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2026-01-23 0:28 ` Gregory Price
2026-03-18 8:53 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-19 15:14 ` Gregory Price
2026-03-19 19:35 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=96a0e49e-4b35-4e6c-a3f2-70891213db18@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox