From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: "dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"ira.weiny@intel.com" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
"dave@stgolabs.net" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
tanxiaofei <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>,
"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Updates for CXL Event Records
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 09:39:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e221493ff4a456cbdd1b773c670d1c7@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxAppnCBf4wFgcQ0@aschofie-mobl2.lan>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
>Sent: 16 October 2024 22:01
>To: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
>Cc: dave.jiang@intel.com; dan.j.williams@intel.com; Jonathan Cameron
><jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>; vishal.l.verma@intel.com;
>ira.weiny@intel.com; dave@stgolabs.net; linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>kernel@vger.kernel.org; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>; tanxiaofei
><tanxiaofei@huawei.com>; Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>
>Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Updates for CXL Event Records
>
>On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 05:33:45PM +0100, shiju.jose@huawei.com wrote:
>> From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
>>
>> CXL spec rev 3.1 CXL Event Records has updated w.r.t CXL spec rev 3.0.
>> Add updates for the above spec changes in the CXL events records and
>> CXL trace events implementation.
>>
>> Note: Please apply following fix patch first if not present.
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/cxl/patch/20241014143003.1170-1-s
>> hiju.jose@huawei.com/
>>
>> Shiju Jose (4):
>> cxl/events: Updates for CXL Common Event Record Format
>> cxl/events: Updates for CXL General Media Event Record
>> cxl/events: Updates for CXL DRAM Event Record
>> cxl/events: Updates for CXL Memory Module Event Record
>
>Thanks, this looks useful! I didn't review line by line but do have some feedback
>before for a v1:
Hi Alison,
Thanks for the feedbacks.
>
>- Suggest being more explicit in the commit msg(s). Something like:
>cxl/events: Update Common Event Record to CXL spec 3.1
Sure. Will add.
>
>- I was a bit surprised that this doesn't simply append new fields to the
>TP_printk() output. Is there some reason for that?
Will do. Thought print new fields before region_name and region_uuid.
>
>- How about updating the mock of these events to include these new fields. I
>don't think this introduces any new formats, but I would certainly eyeball all 3:
>dmesg tp_printk, trace file, and monitor output because all 3 (sadly) present a
>bit differently.
>
I will update the CXL mock test for these new fields.
>-- Alison
>
>>
>> drivers/cxl/core/trace.h | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> include/cxl/event.h | 20 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
Thanks,
Shiju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-17 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-16 16:33 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Updates for CXL Event Records shiju.jose
2024-10-16 16:33 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] cxl/events: Updates for CXL Common Event Record Format shiju.jose
2024-10-17 12:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-16 16:33 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] cxl/events: Updates for CXL General Media Event Record shiju.jose
2024-10-17 12:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-17 14:42 ` Shiju Jose
2024-10-16 16:33 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] cxl/events: Updates for CXL DRAM " shiju.jose
2024-10-17 12:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-16 16:33 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] cxl/events: Updates for CXL Memory Module " shiju.jose
2024-10-17 12:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-17 14:43 ` Shiju Jose
2024-10-16 21:01 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Updates for CXL Event Records Alison Schofield
2024-10-17 9:39 ` Shiju Jose [this message]
2024-10-17 12:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-18 11:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-18 12:09 ` Shiju Jose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e221493ff4a456cbdd1b773c670d1c7@huawei.com \
--to=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=tanxiaofei@huawei.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox