Re: [RFC v4 3/3] hw/cxl: Multi-Region CXL Type-3 Devices (Volatile and Persistent)

[Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>]

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 10:55:58PM +0000, Fan Ni wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:01:57AM -0500, Gregory Price wrote:
> >  
> > -    if (cxl_dstate->pmem_size < CXL_CAPACITY_MULTIPLIER) {
> > +    if ((cxl_dstate->vmem_size < CXL_CAPACITY_MULTIPLIER) ||
> > +        (cxl_dstate->pmem_size < CXL_CAPACITY_MULTIPLIER)) {
> >          return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> >      }
> For a cxl configuration with only pmem or vmem, vmem_size or pmem_size
> can be 0 and fail the check? 
> 

While nonsensical, i believe it's technically supported.  The prior
implementation likewise enabled pmem_size to be 0 in these checks.

> >  
> > +error_cleanup:
> > +    int i;
> > +    for (i = 0; i < cur_ent; i++) {
> > +        g_free(table[i]);
> > +    }
> > +    return rc;
> >  }
> 
> I hit an error when compiling with gcc version 9.4.0
> (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1), maybe moving the declaration of `i` to
> the following loop.
> 
> 
> ../hw/mem/cxl_type3.c:211:5: error: a label can only be part of a statement
> and a declaration is not a statement
>   211 |     int i;
>       |     ^~~

Moved the declaration to the top fo the function with the rest of the
declarations. Good catch.