Re: [PATCH] tracepoint: Allow trace events in modules with TAINT_TEST

[Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>]

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 03:48:42PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> 
> On 8/26/2022 3:35 PM, alison.schofield@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> > 
> > Commit 2852ca7fba9f ("panic: Taint kernel if tests are run")
> > introduced a new taint type, TAINT_TEST, to signal that an
> > in-kernel test has been run.
> 
> has been loaded?
> 

I took that explanation directly from the mentioned commit, where
it seems that 'run' was the intended word when referring to KUnit 
tests. Reviewer feedback led the submitter to make the taint per
module to handle 'longer lasting' modules.

> > 
> > TAINT_TEST taint type defaults into a 'bad_taint' list for
> > kernel tracing and blocks the creation of trace events. This
> > causes a problem for CXL testing where loading the cxl_test
> > module makes all CXL modules out-of-tree, blocking any trace
> > events.
> > 
> > Trace events are in development for CXL at the moment and this
> > issue was found in test with v6.0-rc1.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> > Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   kernel/tracepoint.c | 3 ++-
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> > index 64ea283f2f86..5f17378c9dc2 100644
> > --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
> > +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> > @@ -571,7 +571,8 @@ static void for_each_tracepoint_range(
> >   bool trace_module_has_bad_taint(struct module *mod)
> >   {
> >   	return mod->taints & ~((1 << TAINT_OOT_MODULE) | (1 << TAINT_CRAP) |
> > -			       (1 << TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE));
> > +			       (1 << TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE) |
> > +			       (1 << TAINT_TEST));
> >   }
> >   static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(tracepoint_notify_list);
> > 
> > base-commit: 4c612826bec1441214816827979b62f84a097e91