From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 187175FDA7; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 04:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732248879; cv=none; b=BOmPWCnjB5EQU4WrEur1Kh11aa2XblZOoDroHAWCxDN2CAf60g/3u6l5DQbO66uuhH9KmwKHrh9l1sZJv7ihrMF7R9ZNaw7Aa3dWyfUKcc17H3L0m9fydkE8PnX24RuaneKlwhFeZhCwPDWiIf4W8OgOnMbY8R+yGQH0IqYHeuc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732248879; c=relaxed/simple; bh=smySI+BdEC2vzepGUTO2YSU1TF3UuQDU90O6JCQKLGg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sR4wOaXZyASALvmY+MKOHizBF7iwhhIXyPNBx3A91Ps86Pi74gDy3ZMJDVC+aZ1NA8wCzwXG7qAtLlMXyyVlabYI7G7gxIXSLg/S7tCoFnnMvjz7GsWqjtoqT0mK/spf9DkexgYEr/6o39ZGzpOf9feqqg0CZhToYIZz8GouNtQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=kDVn67qY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="kDVn67qY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1732248877; x=1763784877; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=smySI+BdEC2vzepGUTO2YSU1TF3UuQDU90O6JCQKLGg=; b=kDVn67qYI2UwL3YiFOIYRJ0l+NhYDpq0xGZPhcY4jsvIEro5e4xvQ3+n KcPZZYeU8ASy8BchfpxOI/IUDbkcd0eckUtnsmpQdYrAqJiwjKK2Or0k1 1pdXCf05Snw7pps0HW4/8oZ+Pno6fZXYc6P++gVk+ZuTm4esncisH08Xe AyoKUcWnVzOJO9tke1bKiyEMDPDEdXrm9xXoWQCe/MY7saMaYOoUJIjIp wHzaAcGNRiSpOVn6Z8TcN5dghsVEB8Y86Prt6/d5dqnR3igOr5efXNrmg uLQLp7d6yeyQcvDLpEUPUD8nKVZ0HKuv4k6PzyDSittVtXWyyB59284XH w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: l/WC/ErgQneQ8+8nyQDmMA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +WDcDoELQEehdvG0oXxsxw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11263"; a="32451420" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,174,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="32451420" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2024 20:14:36 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: iQD20e/oR5uNrXfdvDEWHQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: kjiaJzk8QOyq3Msa7lbrZg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,174,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="121330368" Received: from aschofie-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO aschofie-mobl2.lan) ([10.125.110.38]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2024 20:14:36 -0800 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 20:14:34 -0800 From: Alison Schofield To: Alejandro Lucero Palau Cc: alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, martin.habets@xilinx.com, edward.cree@amd.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] cxl: add type2 device basic support Message-ID: References: <20241118164434.7551-1-alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 09:27:34AM +0000, Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote: > > On 11/21/24 03:33, Alison Schofield wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 04:44:07PM +0000, alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com wrote: > > > From: Alejandro Lucero > > > > > > v5 changes: > > Hi Alejandro - > > > Hi Allison, > > > > What is the base commit for this set? (I'm trying to apply it) > > > I'm not using the CXL tree but Linus one, and using 6.12-rc7 > That would've been my next guess ;) I applied w the intent of trying cxl-test but was not able to build image including the cxl-test module because of a circular dependency: cxl_core -> cxl_mock -> cxl_core That happens at Patch 1. I'll comment a bit there... -- Alison > > > In future revs please include the base commit. I typically get it > > by setting the upstream branch and then doing --base="auto" when > > formatting the patches. > > > Apologies for the inconveniences. I'll do so for v6, which will use 6.13 > > Thanks > > > > > > Thanks! > > Alison > > > > ..snip > > > > >