From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3C9C6FD1D for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229649AbjC3UM2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2023 16:12:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49166 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229572AbjC3UM2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2023 16:12:28 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC08F172A for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 13:12:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1680207146; x=1711743146; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=lBeTtojJr6pvXeVnUBRh1kM8d4t1X96fuXYXiU0UfR0=; b=ViA9iENyWlHUwpm5zuVtJkk21HhYk4uu4is77QiopHyh7UWmrsa4smq/ oE7lSSXyBLhRa2fSkXTRvYLvsWQeqbAUKOHvAD2lXcd9TVinlynd4Jfnq sY3vf8GBFwdDqyxAkS206IXuKurMWxS8VhqcAAL71F1/Gyw/bEOkcZMsh ah+oqEa39ALnSNVWtXhRhDtlJJw0vkMdgllJioD+VMC9MkJmPu4xf+NaL YihpL7GzuiG1fAHseXKxxLHjo7ZtV0FNSz1pq16gdAHobf454BsDBarOI MjMxcVU2dZkHPmeAIM39Nc7jUphq5Hw/UmZXynPvkKGXveACbEbgAZKcU A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10665"; a="403973510" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,305,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="403973510" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Mar 2023 13:12:26 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10665"; a="687388720" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,305,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="687388720" Received: from aschofie-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO aschofie-mobl2) ([10.209.67.201]) by fmsmga007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Mar 2023 13:12:25 -0700 Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 13:12:23 -0700 From: Alison Schofield To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: "Williams, Dan J" , "Weiny, Ira" , "Verma, Vishal L" , Ben Widawsky , "Jiang, Dave" , "linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] cxl/memdev: Add support for the Clear Poison mailbox command Message-ID: References: <548e2a175a2f20cdc886297430102ee851d30f26.1679892337.git.alison.schofield@intel.com> <20230330195018.00005afe@Huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230330195018.00005afe@Huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:50:18AM -0700, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 22:03:08 -0700 > alison.schofield@intel.com wrote: > > > From: Alison Schofield > > > > CXL devices optionally support the CLEAR POISON mailbox command. Add > > memdev driver support for clearing poison. > > > > Per the CXL Specification (3.0 8.2.9.8.4.3), after receiving a valid > > clear poison request, the device removes the address from the device's > > Poison List and writes 0 (zero) for 64 bytes starting at address. If > > the device cannot clear poison from the address, it returns a permanent > > media error and -ENXIO is returned to the user. > > > > Additionally, and per the spec also, it is not an error to clear poison > > of an address that is not poisoned. In this case, the device does not > > overwrite the address and the device does not return an error. > > That's not inline with the spec. > > "Clear Poison Write Data: The data the device shall always write into the > requested physical address, atomically, while clearing poison if the location > is marked as being poisoned." > > The overwrite always happens whether or not it's poisoned. Jonathan, I read that with an emphasis on that final 'if' clause: "The data the device shall always write (...blah blah blah...) if the location is marked as being poisoned. So, if the location was not marked as being poisoned, the device won't write anything. Which means, the user cannot use the Clear command to randomly write stuff wherever they please. What do you think of that ? Alison > Other than that > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron > > > > > If the address is not contained in the device's dpa resource, or is > > not 64 byte aligned, return -EINVAL without issuing the mbox command. > > > > Poison clearing is intended for debug only and will be exposed to > > userspace through debugfs. Restrict compilation to CONFIG_DEBUG_FS. > > > > Implementation note: Although the CXL specification defines the clear > > command to accept 64 bytes of 'write-data' to be used when clearing > > the poisoned address, this implementation always uses 0 (zeros) for > > the write-data. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield > > --- > > drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h | 7 +++++++ > > 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c > > index 3b3ac2868848..0e39c3c3fb09 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c > > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c > > @@ -268,6 +268,49 @@ int cxl_inject_poison(struct device *dev, u64 dpa) > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_inject_poison, CXL); > > > > +int cxl_clear_poison(struct device *dev, u64 dpa) > > +{ > > + struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = to_cxl_memdev(dev); > > + struct cxl_mbox_clear_poison clear; > > + struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd; > > + int rc; > > + > > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)) > > + return 0; > > + > > + down_read(&cxl_dpa_rwsem); > > + rc = cxl_validate_poison_dpa(cxlmd, dpa); > > + if (rc) > > + goto out; > > + > > + /* > > + * In CXL 3.0 Spec 8.2.9.8.4.3, the Clear Poison mailbox command > > + * is defined to accept 64 bytes of 'write-data', along with the > > + * address to clear. The device writes the data into the address > > + * atomically, while clearing poison if the location is marked as > > + * being poisoned. > > This description is correct. > > > + * > > + * Always use '0' for the write-data. > > + */ > > + clear = (struct cxl_mbox_clear_poison) { > > + .address = cpu_to_le64(dpa) > > + }; > > + > > + mbox_cmd = (struct cxl_mbox_cmd) { > > + .opcode = CXL_MBOX_OP_CLEAR_POISON, > > + .size_in = sizeof(clear), > > + .payload_in = &clear, > > + }; > > + > > + rc = cxl_internal_send_cmd(cxlmd->cxlds, &mbox_cmd); > > + > > +out: > > + up_read(&cxl_dpa_rwsem); > > + > > + return rc; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_clear_poison, CXL); > > + > > static struct attribute *cxl_memdev_attributes[] = { > > &dev_attr_serial.attr, > > &dev_attr_firmware_version.attr, > > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h > > index 527efef2d700..1d8677ab2306 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h > > +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h > > @@ -607,6 +607,12 @@ struct cxl_mbox_inject_poison { > > __le64 address; > > }; > > > > +/* Clear Poison CXL 3.0 Spec 8.2.9.8.4.3 */ > > +struct cxl_mbox_clear_poison { > > + __le64 address; > > + u8 write_data[CXL_POISON_LEN_MULT]; > > +} __packed; > > + > > /** > > * struct cxl_mem_command - Driver representation of a memory device command > > * @info: Command information as it exists for the UAPI > > @@ -684,6 +690,7 @@ ssize_t cxl_trigger_poison_list(struct device *dev, > > struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, > > size_t len); > > int cxl_inject_poison(struct device *dev, u64 dpa); > > +int cxl_clear_poison(struct device *dev, u64 dpa); > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_CXL_SUSPEND > > void cxl_mem_active_inc(void); >