From: Jim Harris <jim.harris@samsung.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/region: Refactor logic around check_last_peer()
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:37:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTmYswn9afRy/SCF@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6538824b52349_7258329466@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 07:49:47PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> It turns out this patch fails cxl-region-sysfs.sh.
>
> test/cxl-region-sysfs.sh: failed at line 94
>
> [ 38.367581] check_last_peer: cxl region8: cxl_host_bridge.0:port4: mem5:decoder15.1 pos 4 mismatched peer mem7:decoder17.0
>
> This patch looked so appetizing that I really wanted it to be a bug in
> the test and not a bug in this patch, but I think it is the latter.
>
> > @@ -1111,20 +1111,17 @@ static int cxl_port_setup_targets(struct cxl_port *port,
> >
> > cxlsd = to_cxl_switch_decoder(&cxld->dev);
> > if (cxl_rr->nr_targets_set) {
> > - int i, distance;
> > + int i;
> >
> > /*
> > - * Passthrough decoders impose no distance requirements between
> > - * peers
> > + * Check if this endpoint's dport is already in the
> > + * switch decoder's target list, and if so check that
> > + * it is positioned correctly based on the switch's
> > + * interleave.
> > */
> > - if (cxl_rr->nr_targets == 1)
> > - distance = 0;
> > - else
> > - distance = p->nr_targets / cxl_rr->nr_targets;
>
> This calculation is essentially doing the "top-down" version of the
> "bottom-up" position calculation Alison introduced in her proposed region
> assembly fixes:
>
> for_each_parent_port(...)
> pos = pos * parent_ways + parent_pos
>
> So in a x8 region across 2x HBs with 2x switches per HB. The "distance"
> of peers at the switch level is 4. This change makes that 2.
>
> Maybe the right conceptual cleanup is to still ditch this distance
> calculation based on "p->nr_targets / cxl_rr->nr_targets" and walk up
> from this port and multiply the local ways by all the ancestral ways,
> but as is this gets the answer with less steps (modulo all the work to
> build up @ep and @cxl_rr).
Thanks Dan. I'll run with that and push out a v2.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-25 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20231010194652uscas1p18968f3a66d8cbe6d76dd444aa3ec50aa@uscas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-10-10 19:46 ` [PATCH] cxl/region: Refactor logic around check_last_peer() Jim Harris
2023-10-25 2:49 ` Dan Williams
2023-10-25 22:37 ` Jim Harris [this message]
2023-11-01 5:12 ` Jim Harris
2023-11-01 5:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Jim Harris
2023-11-02 22:42 ` Alison Schofield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTmYswn9afRy/SCF@ubuntu \
--to=jim.harris@samsung.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox