From: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fan Ni <nifan.cxl@gmail.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/pci: Get rid of pointer arithmetic reading CDAT table
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:43:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZa1-11632f6CckT@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <657bd741d2961_269bd294d@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>
On 14.12.23 20:34:09, Dan Williams wrote:
> struct cdat_response {
> __le32 doe_header;
> union {
> struct cdat_header header;
> struct cdat_entry_header entry;
> u8 table[];
> };
> } __packed;
>
> As far as I can see nothing outside of drivers/cxl/core/pci.c needs
> 'struct cdat_response', so it can stay local to this C file.
I moved that close to cdat_header and cdat_entry_header which is also
defined in cxlpci.h but only used in core/pci.c. I would like to keep
them together but we could move that completely into pci.c in a
separate patch?
Thanks,
-Robert
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-17 0:03 [PATCH] cxl/cdat: Free correct buffer on checksum error Ira Weiny
2023-11-17 15:50 ` Dave Jiang
2023-11-17 17:14 ` fan
2023-11-17 20:09 ` Robert Richter
2023-11-17 20:15 ` [PATCH] cxl/pci: Get rid of pointer arithmetic reading CDAT table Robert Richter
2023-11-17 20:25 ` Dave Jiang
2023-11-28 20:06 ` Ira Weiny
2023-12-07 21:18 ` Dan Williams
2023-12-08 22:52 ` Ira Weiny
2024-01-05 14:49 ` Robert Richter
2023-12-15 4:34 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-04 8:41 ` Robert Richter
2024-01-04 13:43 ` Robert Richter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZa1-11632f6CckT@rric.localdomain \
--to=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=nifan.cxl@gmail.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox