From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
dave@stgolabs.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl: Clarify root_port cleanup routine for cxl_qos_class_verify()
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 09:05:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZblYSTDfT25N4Ma@aschofie-mobl2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <170438448564.3436708.17525645430052031684.stgit@djiang5-mobl3>
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 09:08:05AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> The current __free() call for root_port in cxl_qos_class_verify() depends
> on 'struct device' to be the first member of 'struct cxl_port' and calls
> put_device() directly with the root_port pointer passed in. Add a helper
> function put_cxl_port() to handle the put_device() properly and avoid
> future issues if the 'struct device' member moves.
>
> Suggested-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c b/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> index cd84d87f597a..d6e64570032f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
> @@ -345,11 +345,21 @@ static void discard_dpa_perf(struct list_head *list)
> }
> DEFINE_FREE(dpa_perf, struct list_head *, if (!list_empty(_T)) discard_dpa_perf(_T))
>
> +static void put_cxl_port(struct cxl_port *port)
> +{
> + if (!port)
> + return;
> +
> + put_device(&port->dev);
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_FREE(cxl_port, struct cxl_port *, put_cxl_port(_T))
> +
> static int cxl_qos_class_verify(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> {
> struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = cxlmd->cxlds;
> struct cxl_memdev_state *mds = to_cxl_memdev_state(cxlds);
> - struct cxl_port *root_port __free(put_device) = NULL;
> + struct cxl_port *root_port __free(cxl_port) = NULL;
> LIST_HEAD(__discard);
> struct list_head *discard __free(dpa_perf) = &__discard;
> int rc;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-04 16:08 [PATCH] cxl: Clarify root_port cleanup routine for cxl_qos_class_verify() Dave Jiang
2024-01-04 17:05 ` Alison Schofield [this message]
2024-01-04 18:22 ` Robert Richter
2024-01-04 18:26 ` Dave Jiang
2024-01-04 19:52 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-08 11:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-01-08 11:57 ` Robert Richter
2024-01-08 12:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZblYSTDfT25N4Ma@aschofie-mobl2 \
--to=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox