Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] SRAT/CEDT fixes and updates
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:34:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZioHc_L5PxvrMNaP@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66294584e3869_b6e0294c5@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>

On 24.04.24 10:46:44, Dan Williams wrote:
> Robert Richter wrote:
> > Some fixes and updates for SRAT/CEDT parsing code. Patches can be
> > applied individually and are independent.
> > 
> > First patch fixes a page fault during boot. It should be marked
> > stable.
> > 
> > 2nd patch reworks the code around numa_fill_memblks() (Dan's
> > suggestion).
> 
> Just squash these 2 together. The -stable maintainers continue to assert
> that fixes should do the right thing by mainline mainline standards and
> let the -stable backport process decide if a different change needs to
> be made for older kernels. I see no benefit for tracking 2 changes for
> how numa_fill_memblks() is defined.

Ok, will drop #1 in a v5.

Thanks,

-Robert

      reply	other threads:[~2024-04-25  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-24 15:48 [PATCH v4 0/7] SRAT/CEDT fixes and updates Robert Richter
2024-04-24 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] x86/numa: Fix SRAT lookup of CFMWS ranges with numa_fill_memblks() Robert Richter
2024-04-24 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] x86/numa: Remove numa_fill_memblks() from sparsemem.h using __weak Robert Richter
2024-04-24 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] ACPI/NUMA: Remove architecture dependent remainings Robert Richter
2024-04-24 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] ACPI/NUMA: Squash acpi_numa_slit_init() into acpi_parse_slit() Robert Richter
2024-04-24 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] ACPI/NUMA: Squash acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() into acpi_parse_memory_affinity() Robert Richter
2024-04-24 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] ACPI/NUMA: Add log messages for memory ranges found in CEDT Robert Richter
2024-04-24 17:54   ` Dan Williams
2024-04-25  7:30     ` Robert Richter
2024-04-25 18:56       ` Alison Schofield
2024-04-26 18:14         ` Robert Richter
2024-04-24 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] ACPI/NUMA: Print CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT) Robert Richter
2024-04-24 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] SRAT/CEDT fixes and updates Dan Williams
2024-04-25  7:34   ` Robert Richter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZioHc_L5PxvrMNaP@rric.localdomain \
    --to=rrichter@amd.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox