From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4936622334 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 20:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720472221; cv=none; b=pn9/yYeBk71+U2Mofbj+e697G8KAX2CBoqyRqdU3nv+/Z+6URRKnlQ8aEgpIzzSFX3uaTQLi8tYBpQfQUAXPK8Ax+mas5HlJfpG3KKySCcS2lxzACYj/9twE41beGNT09rs7AiWMWiQy6luqVdZdq3csfvVEoRnjQfvI1+uAPB0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720472221; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Hyj9bbq09DzCn5Ot+Yw6VpSUjwgE6ok381CKCCf9nh8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=L7xupOcP/0OkBLhI3SG81TKV2bylEQUGsGYHeG90DjpQo2/r3baiqyPw/e5xotUJzNT2wrT6rvrEksnROHh55TzUO88SfRPpaw+8BztDKPR6A+rZRru02erST9SVLXxtEBvamaEp8BHLENDlsdgAaYXdO7IJhwzZgujZvjj7iCA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=N+GW31uF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="N+GW31uF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1720472218; x=1752008218; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=Hyj9bbq09DzCn5Ot+Yw6VpSUjwgE6ok381CKCCf9nh8=; b=N+GW31uFYd7nNH4FBI7mjcLzi8Y7wrkoriqVc26ne6htfLaWGUG0q5pz fix1wzdfMqqPGRAfxtfXDedOuMYyQ4ITJRI6Gu4GGSTJDAmhzNeUYxyR8 cQUD8M+FxOF5O4xx871e8qCfNa8tdMmH9z6mhVRGwWeTt+npC8/IbAQmA j/m+0ahCOHEGlBY3Nkm6M4UCBXlPVfaxRihB4T9H1FolomSqmwpookV8V vDduMKKN/O29NggY87zxUn4Z72LeaCisN5KCJ7HmVk8MsQWBQBrdZK0IT dpt38sfoMwWNXSLdfltBWw7WG2Gd1YyRXDxuGs9T7METcSnOV35nMJe8m A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 7NhUPiwwR7emn1iSC+4qrQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: z6G9J0S3SM2gHApgjn4JgQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11127"; a="20599163" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,193,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="20599163" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jul 2024 13:56:57 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BIvVlcKpTCGAiKgzwb4Jmg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dGd2blTSRVCkV9Emi4YkKA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,193,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="85164181" Received: from aschofie-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO aschofie-mobl2) ([10.209.105.241]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jul 2024 13:56:57 -0700 Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 13:56:55 -0700 From: Alison Schofield To: "Xingtao Yao (Fujitsu)" Cc: "nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" , Dave Jiang Subject: Re: [ndctl PATCH v13 7/8] cxl/list: add --media-errors option to cxl list Message-ID: References: <76eb7636d1aab2fecd60d18617828d004adb58d9.1720241079.git.alison.schofield@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 02:26:11AM +0000, Xingtao Yao (Fujitsu) wrote: > > -v:: > > --verbose:: > > Increase verbosity of the output. This can be specified > > @@ -431,7 +485,7 @@ OPTIONS > > devices with --idle. > > - *-vvv* > > Everything *-vv* provides, plus enable > > - --health and --partition. > > + --health, --partition, --media-errors. > insert an “and” before "--media-errors" may be better. Well...I'm not a fan of the "and', but since it was there before, and it is still used in the single -v case, I'll put it back to be the same. Eagle eye! Thanks for testing it out! --Alison > > Tested-by: Xingtao Yao