Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: ira.weiny@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
	alison.schofield@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] cxl/port: Fix cxl_bus_rescan() vs bus_rescan_devices()
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:57:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxkdAC2y8zHQGgUc@PC2K9PVX.TheFacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <172964781104.81806.4277549800082443769.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 06:43:32PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> It turns out since its original introduction, pre-2.6.12,
> bus_rescan_devices() has skipped devices that might be in the process of
> attaching or detaching from their driver. For CXL this behavior is
> unwanted and expects that cxl_bus_rescan() is a probe barrier.
> 
> That behavior is simple enough to achieve with bus_for_each_dev() paired
> with call to device_attach(), and it is unclear why bus_rescan_devices()
> took the position of lockless consumption of dev->driver which is racy.
> 
> The "Fixes:" but no "Cc: stable" on this patch reflects that the issue
> is merely by inspection since the bug that triggered the discovery of
> this potential problem [1] is fixed by other means.  However, a stable
> backport should do no harm.
> 
> Fixes: 8dd2bc0f8e02 ("cxl/mem: Add the cxl_mem driver")
> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/20241004212504.1246-1-gourry@gourry.net [1]
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

Tested-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>

> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/port.c |   13 ++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> index e666ec6a9085..af92c67bc954 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> @@ -2084,11 +2084,18 @@ static void cxl_bus_remove(struct device *dev)
>  
>  static struct workqueue_struct *cxl_bus_wq;
>  
> -static void cxl_bus_rescan_queue(struct work_struct *w)
> +static int cxl_rescan_attach(struct device *dev, void *data)
>  {
> -	int rc = bus_rescan_devices(&cxl_bus_type);
> +	int rc = device_attach(dev);
> +
> +	dev_vdbg(dev, "rescan: %s\n", rc ? "attach" : "detached");
>  
> -	pr_debug("CXL bus rescan result: %d\n", rc);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void cxl_bus_rescan_queue(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> +	bus_for_each_dev(&cxl_bus_type, NULL, NULL, cxl_rescan_attach);
>  }
>  
>  void cxl_bus_rescan(void)
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-23 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-23  1:43 [PATCH v2 0/6] cxl: Initialization and shutdown fixes Dan Williams
2024-10-23  1:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] cxl/port: Fix CXL port initialization order when the subsystem is built-in Dan Williams
2024-10-24  9:42   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-24 16:19     ` Dan Williams
2024-10-24 16:39       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-24 10:36   ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-10-24 16:32     ` Dan Williams
2024-10-25  8:43       ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-10-25 15:19         ` Dan Williams
2024-10-24 14:14   ` Ira Weiny
2024-10-25 19:32   ` [PATCH v3 " Dan Williams
2024-10-23  1:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] cxl/port: Fix cxl_bus_rescan() vs bus_rescan_devices() Dan Williams
2024-10-23 15:57   ` Gregory Price [this message]
2024-10-24  9:43   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-24 14:29   ` Ira Weiny
2024-10-23  1:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] cxl/acpi: Ensure ports ready at cxl_acpi_probe() return Dan Williams
2024-10-23 15:58   ` Gregory Price
2024-10-24  9:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-24 14:34   ` Ira Weiny
2024-10-23  1:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] cxl/port: Fix use-after-free, permit out-of-order decoder shutdown Dan Williams
2024-10-24 15:55   ` Ira Weiny
2024-10-23  1:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] cxl/port: Prevent out-of-order decoder allocation Dan Williams
2024-10-24 12:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-24 16:20   ` Ira Weiny
2024-10-23  1:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] cxl/test: Improve init-order fidelity relative to real-world systems Dan Williams
2024-10-24 12:17   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-24 16:32   ` Ira Weiny
2024-10-23 13:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] cxl: Initialization and shutdown fixes Robert Richter
2024-10-23 16:00   ` Gregory Price
2024-10-23 20:34   ` Dan Williams
2024-10-24 11:56     ` Robert Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZxkdAC2y8zHQGgUc@PC2K9PVX.TheFacebook.com \
    --to=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox