From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [NDCTL PATCH] cxl: Add helper function to verify port is in memdev hierarchy
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:54:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFM1iWWREEU_dlyF@aschofie-mobl2.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250618204117.4039030-1-dave.jiang@intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 01:41:17PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> 'cxl enable-port -m' uses cxl_port_get_dport_by_memdev() to find the
> memdevs that are associated with a port in order to enable those
> associated memdevs. When the kernel switch to delayed dport
> initialization by enumerating the dports during memdev probe, the
> dports are no longer valid until the memdev is probed. This means
> that cxl_port_get_dport_by_memdev() will not find any memdevs under
> the port.
>
> Add a new helper function cxl_port_is_memdev_hierarchy() that checks if a
> port is in the memdev hierarchy via the memdev->host_path where the sysfs
> path contains all the devices in the hierarchy. This call is also backward
> compatible with the old behavior.
I get how this new function works w the delayed dport init that is
coming soon to the CXL driver. I'm not so clear on why we leave the
existing function in place when we know it will fail in some use
cases. (It is a libcxl fcn afterall)
Why not change the behavior of the existing function?
How come this usage of cxl_port_get_dport_by_memdev() needs to change
to the new helper and not the other usage in action_disable()?
If the 'sometimes fails to find' function stays, how about libcxl
docs explaining the limitations.
Just stirring the pot to better understand ;)
--Alison
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
> cxl/lib/libcxl.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> cxl/lib/libcxl.sym | 5 +++++
> cxl/libcxl.h | 3 +++
> cxl/port.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/cxl/lib/libcxl.c b/cxl/lib/libcxl.c
> index 5d97023377ec..cafde1cee4e8 100644
> --- a/cxl/lib/libcxl.c
> +++ b/cxl/lib/libcxl.c
> @@ -2024,6 +2024,37 @@ CXL_EXPORT int cxl_memdev_nvdimm_bridge_active(struct cxl_memdev *memdev)
> return is_enabled(path);
> }
>
> +CXL_EXPORT bool cxl_memdev_is_port_ancestor(struct cxl_memdev *memdev,
> + struct cxl_port *port)
> +{
> + const char *uport = cxl_port_get_host(port);
> + const char *start = "devices";
> + const char *pstr = "platform";
> + char *host, *pos;
> +
> + host = strdup(memdev->host_path);
> + if (!host)
> + return false;
> +
> + pos = strstr(host, start);
> + pos += strlen(start) + 1;
> + if (strncmp(pos, pstr, strlen(pstr)) == 0)
> + pos += strlen(pstr) + 1;
> + pos = strtok(pos, "/");
> +
> + while (pos) {
> + if (strcmp(pos, uport) == 0) {
> + free(host);
> + return true;
> + }
> + pos = strtok(NULL, "/");
> + }
> +
> + free(host);
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int cxl_port_init(struct cxl_port *port, struct cxl_port *parent_port,
> enum cxl_port_type type, struct cxl_ctx *ctx, int id,
> const char *cxlport_base)
> diff --git a/cxl/lib/libcxl.sym b/cxl/lib/libcxl.sym
> index 3ad0cd06e25a..e01a676cdeb9 100644
> --- a/cxl/lib/libcxl.sym
> +++ b/cxl/lib/libcxl.sym
> @@ -295,3 +295,8 @@ global:
> cxl_fwctl_get_major;
> cxl_fwctl_get_minor;
> } LIBECXL_8;
> +
> +LIBCXL_10 {
> +global:
> + cxl_memdev_is_port_ancestor;
> +} LIBCXL_9;
> diff --git a/cxl/libcxl.h b/cxl/libcxl.h
> index 54d97d7bb501..54bc025b121d 100644
> --- a/cxl/libcxl.h
> +++ b/cxl/libcxl.h
> @@ -179,6 +179,9 @@ bool cxl_dport_maps_memdev(struct cxl_dport *dport, struct cxl_memdev *memdev);
> struct cxl_dport *cxl_port_get_dport_by_memdev(struct cxl_port *port,
> struct cxl_memdev *memdev);
>
> +bool cxl_memdev_is_port_ancestor(struct cxl_memdev *memdev,
> + struct cxl_port *port);
> +
> #define cxl_dport_foreach(port, dport) \
> for (dport = cxl_dport_get_first(port); dport != NULL; \
> dport = cxl_dport_get_next(dport))
> diff --git a/cxl/port.c b/cxl/port.c
> index 89f3916d85aa..c951c0c771e8 100644
> --- a/cxl/port.c
> +++ b/cxl/port.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int action_enable(struct cxl_port *port)
> return rc;
>
> cxl_memdev_foreach(ctx, memdev)
> - if (cxl_port_get_dport_by_memdev(port, memdev))
> + if (cxl_memdev_is_port_ancestor(memdev, port))
> cxl_memdev_enable(memdev);
> return 0;
> }
>
> base-commit: 74b9e411bf13e87df39a517d10143fafa7e2ea92
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-18 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 20:41 [NDCTL PATCH] cxl: Add helper function to verify port is in memdev hierarchy Dave Jiang
2025-06-18 21:54 ` Alison Schofield [this message]
2025-06-18 21:58 ` Dave Jiang
2025-06-18 22:45 ` Alison Schofield
2025-06-18 22:50 ` Dave Jiang
2025-07-04 0:17 ` Alison Schofield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFM1iWWREEU_dlyF@aschofie-mobl2.lan \
--to=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox