From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cxl/region: fix region leak when attach_target fails in cxl_add_to_region
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 15:15:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZy1VGindEm-NbFn@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZyvGnKfWI1Mku-c@aschofie-mobl2.lan>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 11:48:42AM -0800, Alison Schofield wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 11:30:12PM -0500, Gregory Price wrote:
> > cxl_add_to_region() ignores the return value of attach_target(). When
> > attach_target() fails (e.g. cxl_port_setup_targets() returns -ENXIO),
> > the auto-discovered region remains registered with its HPA resource
> > consumed but never reaches COMMIT state. Subsequent region creation
> > attempts fail with -ENOSPC because the HPA range is already reserved.
> >
> > Track whether this call to cxl_add_to_region() created the region, and
> > call drop_region() on attach_target() failure to unregister it and
> > release the HPA resource. Pre-existing regions are left alone since
> > other endpoints may already be attached.
>
> I see you dropping this, perhaps just for the moment, because
> the drop_region() you wanted to use is not available yet.
>
Yeah it's not a particularly useful cleanup in the current
infrastructure because nothing actually uses this pattern (yet).
> This looks a lot like
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/2a613604c0cdda6d9f838ae9b47ea6d936c5e4ce.1769746294.git.alison.schofield@intel.com/
> cxl/region: Unregister auto-created region when assembly fails
> When auto-created region assembly fails the region remains registered
> but disabled. The region continues to reserve its memory resource,
> preventing DAX from registering the memory.
> Unregister the region on assembly failure to release the resource.
>
> And the review comments on that one, or at least on that thread in
> general, was to leave all the broken things in place.
> I didn't agree with that, and hope to see this version move ahead
> when you have the drop_region you need.
>
>
The important note here is the difference between auto-regions and
manually created regions. For auto-regions, you might have another
endpoint show up looking for the partially created region - and then
just go off and create it anyway because it thinks it was first.
But in my driver, i'm explicitly converting these auto-regions into
other things, and if that fails it causes *all other* region creation to
fail - even if it wasn't actually dependent on that original region.
This is only an issue if you have two devices unbind/bind cycling at
the same time - i.e.
echo 0000:d0:00.00 > cxl_pci/unbind
echo 0000:e0:00.00 > cxl_pci/unbind
echo 0000:d0:00.00 > mydriver/bind
echo 0000:e0:00.00 > mydriver/bind
If the platform has pre-programmed and locked the decoders, and one of
the two devices fails to probe and leaves a hanging partially
created region, the other device will fail too.
It's a pretty narrow failure scenario.
~Gregory
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-21 4:30 [PATCH 1/2] cxl/region: fix region leak when attach_target fails in cxl_add_to_region Gregory Price
2026-02-21 4:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] cxl/region: skip default driver attach for memdev with attach callbacks Gregory Price
2026-02-21 5:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] cxl/region: fix region leak when attach_target fails in cxl_add_to_region Gregory Price
2026-02-24 16:15 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-02-25 1:42 ` Gregory Price
2026-02-21 10:36 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-21 11:49 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-21 11:53 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-23 19:48 ` Alison Schofield
2026-02-23 20:15 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2026-02-24 0:18 ` Alison Schofield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZy1VGindEm-NbFn@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
--to=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox