public inbox for linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
	jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
	vishal.l.verma@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cxl/region: fix region leak when attach_target fails in cxl_add_to_region
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 15:15:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZy1VGindEm-NbFn@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZyvGnKfWI1Mku-c@aschofie-mobl2.lan>

On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 11:48:42AM -0800, Alison Schofield wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 11:30:12PM -0500, Gregory Price wrote:
> > cxl_add_to_region() ignores the return value of attach_target().  When
> > attach_target() fails (e.g. cxl_port_setup_targets() returns -ENXIO),
> > the auto-discovered region remains registered with its HPA resource
> > consumed but never reaches COMMIT state.  Subsequent region creation
> > attempts fail with -ENOSPC because the HPA range is already reserved.
> > 
> > Track whether this call to cxl_add_to_region() created the region, and
> > call drop_region() on attach_target() failure to unregister it and
> > release the HPA resource.  Pre-existing regions are left alone since
> > other endpoints may already be attached.
> 
> I see you dropping this, perhaps just for the moment, because
> the drop_region() you wanted to use is not available yet.
> 

Yeah it's not a particularly useful cleanup in the current
infrastructure because nothing actually uses this pattern (yet).

> This looks a lot like 
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/2a613604c0cdda6d9f838ae9b47ea6d936c5e4ce.1769746294.git.alison.schofield@intel.com/
> 	cxl/region: Unregister auto-created region when assembly fails
> 	When auto-created region assembly fails the region remains registered
> 	but disabled. The region continues to reserve its memory resource,
> 	preventing DAX from registering the memory.
> 	Unregister the region on assembly failure to release the resource.
> 
> And the review comments on that one, or at least on that thread in
> general, was to leave all the broken things in place.
> I didn't agree with that, and hope to see this version move ahead
> when you have the drop_region you need.
> 
> 

The important note here is the difference between auto-regions and
manually created regions.  For auto-regions, you might have another
endpoint show up looking for the partially created region - and then
just go off and create it anyway because it thinks it was first.

But in my driver, i'm explicitly converting these auto-regions into
other things, and if that fails it causes *all other* region creation to
fail - even if it wasn't actually dependent on that original region.

This is only an issue if you have two devices unbind/bind cycling at
the same time - i.e.

   echo 0000:d0:00.00 > cxl_pci/unbind
   echo 0000:e0:00.00 > cxl_pci/unbind
   echo 0000:d0:00.00 > mydriver/bind
   echo 0000:e0:00.00 > mydriver/bind

If the platform has pre-programmed and locked the decoders, and one of
the two devices fails to probe and leaves a hanging partially
created region, the other device will fail too.

It's a pretty narrow failure scenario.

~Gregory

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-23 20:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-21  4:30 [PATCH 1/2] cxl/region: fix region leak when attach_target fails in cxl_add_to_region Gregory Price
2026-02-21  4:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] cxl/region: skip default driver attach for memdev with attach callbacks Gregory Price
2026-02-21  5:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] cxl/region: fix region leak when attach_target fails in cxl_add_to_region Gregory Price
2026-02-24 16:15   ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-02-25  1:42     ` Gregory Price
2026-02-21 10:36 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-21 11:49 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-21 11:53 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-23 19:48 ` Alison Schofield
2026-02-23 20:15   ` Gregory Price [this message]
2026-02-24  0:18     ` Alison Schofield

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZy1VGindEm-NbFn@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
    --to=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox