From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
To: KobaK <kobak@nvidia.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/region: Validate partition index before array access
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 16:16:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adrWNiO-KeTIqBbL@aschofie-mobl2.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260409154445.2416120-1-kobak@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 11:44:45PM +0800, KobaK wrote:
> From: Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>
>
> Check partition index bounds before accessing cxlds->part[] to prevent
> out-of-bounds access when part is -1 or invalid.
>
> The partition index is read from cxled->part without validation. If it's
> negative or exceeds nr_partitions, accessing cxlds->part[part].mode will
> cause out-of-bounds array access.
>
> Fixes: 5ec67596e368 ("cxl/region: Drop goto pattern of construct_region()")
> Signed-off-by: Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>
This bounds check need is overstated. All writers of cxled->part either
initialize it to -1 or assign it from a bounded walk of cxlds->nr_partitions.
There is no path in that code that produces a positive out-of-range index,
and the only invalid state is part == -1. So, let's focus on the -1 case.
(If we did want to defensively guard against out-of-range indices, that
would need to be applied consistently across all accesses of cxlds->part[part],
not just in construct_region(). I don't think that is needed.)
The Fixes: Tag was a bit perplexing. The cited commit does touch any lines
related to partition indexing, at least based on "git show 5ec67596e368".
However, a close look suggests something else is going on.
Commit be5cbd084027 ("cxl: Kill enum cxl_decoder_mode") which previously
reworked this code included the needed check:
+ int rc, part = READ_ONCE(cxled->part);+
+ if (part < 0)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
And that check is indeed preserved in the final lore posting of the patch
referenced in the Fixes: tag:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221013205.126419-1-ming.li@zohomail.com/
The version that landed in the tree however is different:
5ec67596e368 ("cxl/region: Drop goto pattern of construct_region()")
This suggests the check was not removed by that commit directly but instead
lost during a merge.
At this point, I suggest a v2 of 'this' patch that simply restores the
missing check, no added range check, no debug messaging, simply:
+ if (part < 0)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
It would be useful for Ming and DaveJ to take a close look at the merge
to confirm if anything else is off.
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index edc267c6cf77a..6be46636db7ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -3712,6 +3712,14 @@ static struct cxl_region *construct_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> int rc, part = READ_ONCE(cxled->part);
> struct cxl_region *cxlr;
>
> + if (part < 0 || part >= cxlds->nr_partitions) {
> + dev_err(cxlmd->dev.parent,
> + "%s:%s: invalid partition index %d (max %u)\n",
> + dev_name(&cxlmd->dev), dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev),
> + part, cxlds->nr_partitions);
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
> + }
> +
> do {
> cxlr = __create_region(cxlrd, cxlds->part[part].mode,
> atomic_read(&cxlrd->region_id),
> --
> 2.43.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-11 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-09 15:44 [PATCH] cxl/region: Validate partition index before array access KobaK
2026-04-09 16:58 ` Dave Jiang
2026-04-09 18:26 ` KobaK
2026-04-11 23:16 ` Alison Schofield [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adrWNiO-KeTIqBbL@aschofie-mobl2.lan \
--to=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox