public inbox for linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
To: KobaK <kobak@nvidia.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/region: Validate partition index before array access
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 16:16:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adrWNiO-KeTIqBbL@aschofie-mobl2.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260409154445.2416120-1-kobak@nvidia.com>

On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 11:44:45PM +0800, KobaK wrote:
> From: Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>
> 
> Check partition index bounds before accessing cxlds->part[] to prevent
> out-of-bounds access when part is -1 or invalid.
> 
> The partition index is read from cxled->part without validation. If it's
> negative or exceeds nr_partitions, accessing cxlds->part[part].mode will
> cause out-of-bounds array access.
> 
> Fixes: 5ec67596e368 ("cxl/region: Drop goto pattern of construct_region()")
> Signed-off-by: Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>


This bounds check need is overstated. All writers of cxled->part either
initialize it to -1 or assign it from a bounded walk of cxlds->nr_partitions.
There is no path in that code that produces a positive out-of-range index,
and the only invalid state is part == -1. So, let's focus on the -1 case.

(If we did want to defensively guard against out-of-range indices, that
would need to be applied consistently across all accesses of cxlds->part[part],
not just in construct_region(). I don't think that is needed.)

The Fixes: Tag was a bit perplexing. The cited commit does touch any lines
related to partition indexing, at least based on "git show 5ec67596e368".
However, a close look suggests something else is going on.

Commit be5cbd084027 ("cxl: Kill enum cxl_decoder_mode") which previously
reworked this code included the needed check:

+	int rc, part = READ_ONCE(cxled->part);+
+       if (part < 0)
+               return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);

And that check is indeed preserved in the final lore posting of the patch
referenced in the Fixes: tag:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221013205.126419-1-ming.li@zohomail.com/

The version that landed in the tree however is different:
5ec67596e368 ("cxl/region: Drop goto pattern of construct_region()")

This suggests the check was not removed by that commit directly but instead
lost during a merge.

At this point, I suggest a v2 of 'this' patch that simply restores the
missing check, no added range check, no debug messaging, simply:

	+       if (part < 0)
	+               return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);


It would be useful for Ming and DaveJ to take a close look at the merge
to confirm if anything else is off.


> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index edc267c6cf77a..6be46636db7ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -3712,6 +3712,14 @@ static struct cxl_region *construct_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
>  	int rc, part = READ_ONCE(cxled->part);
>  	struct cxl_region *cxlr;
>  
> +	if (part < 0 || part >= cxlds->nr_partitions) {
> +		dev_err(cxlmd->dev.parent,
> +			"%s:%s: invalid partition index %d (max %u)\n",
> +			dev_name(&cxlmd->dev), dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev),
> +			part, cxlds->nr_partitions);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
> +	}
> +
>  	do {
>  		cxlr = __create_region(cxlrd, cxlds->part[part].mode,
>  				       atomic_read(&cxlrd->region_id),
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-11 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-09 15:44 [PATCH] cxl/region: Validate partition index before array access KobaK
2026-04-09 16:58 ` Dave Jiang
2026-04-09 18:26 ` KobaK
2026-04-11 23:16 ` Alison Schofield [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adrWNiO-KeTIqBbL@aschofie-mobl2.lan \
    --to=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox