From: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
To: Wei Hou <wei.hou@scaleflux.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>,
alison.schofield@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
iweiny@kernel.org, ming.li@zohomail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kobak@nvidia.com,
kaihengf@nvidia.com, newtonl@nvidia.com, kristinc@nvidia.com,
mochs@nvidia.com, danwilliams@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/pci: Remove incorrect mbox.valid check in cxl_pci_type3_init_mailbox()
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 16:10:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajzhsubot_PSYtHQ@MWDK4CY14F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260618170356.25382-1-wei.hou@scaleflux.com>
On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 01:03:56AM +0800, Wei Hou wrote:
> The driver's design intent is that missing or malformed component
> registers should not prevent mailbox initialization. cxl_pci_probe()
> already reflects this: the CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT setup path only
> emits a dev_warn() and continues when component registers are absent,
> rather than returning an error.
>
> The check 'if (!cxlds->reg_map.device_map.mbox.valid)' violates this
> intent and is also technically incorrect for two reasons:
>
> 1. Wrong struct: the MEMDEV register block is enumerated into a local
> variable 'map', not into 'cxlds->reg_map'. The device_map.mbox.valid
> field inside cxlds->reg_map is never written by the MEMDEV probe and
> will always read as zero regardless of actual hardware capability.
>
> 2. Already validated: cxl_pci_setup_regs(CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV) calls
> cxl_probe_regs() which explicitly checks mbox.valid and returns
> -ENXIO if the mailbox is absent. If that check passes, the mailbox is
> guaranteed to be present by the time cxl_pci_type3_init_mailbox() is
> called.
>
> The value that the check actually reads is component_map.ras.valid,
> which aliases device_map.mbox.valid in the union. This is populated by
> the COMPONENT probe, not the MEMDEV probe. On devices where the
> component register BAR does not implement a CXL Component Capability
> Array (e.g. certain DCD devices), cxl_probe_component_regs() returns
> early leaving ras.valid=false. Through the union, this makes mbox.valid
> read as false, causing cxl_pci_type3_init_mailbox() to return -ENODEV
> (-19) even though the mailbox hardware is fully functional.
>
> Remove the check. Mailbox presence has already been validated by
> cxl_pci_setup_regs(CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV). The presence or absence of
> component registers is irrelevant to mailbox initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Hou <wei.hou@scaleflux.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/pci.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> index bace662dc988..e44e5d209900 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> @@ -691,12 +691,6 @@ static int cxl_pci_type3_init_mailbox(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> {
> int rc;
>
> - /*
> - * Fail the init if there's no mailbox. For a type3 this is out of spec.
> - */
> - if (!cxlds->reg_map.device_map.mbox.valid)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> rc = cxl_mailbox_init(&cxlds->cxl_mbox, cxlds->dev);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> --
> 2.24.1
>
>
Btw,
You missed to sent this one to many people, I'll add them this time for you
--Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-18 17:03 [PATCH] cxl/pci: Remove incorrect mbox.valid check in cxl_pci_type3_init_mailbox() Wei Hou
2026-06-18 17:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 8:05 ` Richard Cheng
2026-06-25 8:10 ` Richard Cheng [this message]
2026-06-28 15:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Wei Hou
2026-06-29 5:10 ` Li Ming
2026-06-29 16:32 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajzhsubot_PSYtHQ@MWDK4CY14F \
--to=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=danwilliams@nvidia.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kaihengf@nvidia.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kristinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=wei.hou@scaleflux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox