From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3FE71DF242 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738777957; cv=none; b=RCjf9Ypk4a3C+WKtyQPq3yTFV5t+v/UbeKpa7+RDMOXGvfxshRQI/z+zhZAgO+2iOxhLmN+dVkyYQ6qsWsftvDninDgGWTOu1vcHMq+6SmRhObZZKyDQzLPGXK4A/mywfluU3jg0D3hEn6aWxH7YAAWicWUoe/8/IFxMpwLj8OM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738777957; c=relaxed/simple; bh=C9yoU41fZP6TEt758uDkc66qkW3/BQvO4YCMbAnR+eA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=NmN/jSqpAFniD0AKE7sRNgQyNewN5R2EUeEmSwbFtzxqqxtij8blKaRq2frMldfRNPnrvIlFeYR/Sma5fILP91UBTb/cdQ7h3kz9Q23mFx1/K6OtrEGz4Of+uTlOjnCBvUvGb679aOVjHyxRixcIKUEm4iBAY29ZqhmNV/rBqdk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=dSsqDpzx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="dSsqDpzx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1738777949; x=1770313949; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C9yoU41fZP6TEt758uDkc66qkW3/BQvO4YCMbAnR+eA=; b=dSsqDpzxHcT6cik0/9wfmfec6vL08789uCJUEqk5r1lKZn3sMc2mr9MF xNWwYeKz7ehvtaGXtqP1AWwNypvotxKgN5NOOV8KuEoXVP7Cm7lCYtc1N c2f37g2m/HKkSamu2nMax0UphZ87D2GNV37wMWD6lsRV6R8gtKARsoOva sAj9mFRaPdMJ8w/qBYyLS/ZO3jDGlP9s2EembBSDEEvDAm0IJ4eBJ3/No apGG+TZ9Vop+uRWLxSA/e8rsSTKDmWYn5bArs8s8q3uTWnG+XyMEfcttq yh57ysdkxZ4LJZk+B6IuUQABPZdOYLwnw99+9sitGAqD1BhDmYJNlnfL/ Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: z/4dIffeSYCr0NDgmh4qsQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: XipdQC3iQvq3YCgDiz0V1Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11336"; a="50749719" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,262,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="50749719" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2025 09:52:29 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: nu4zTP7fTUmkIiyJrB96TA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: pjwpmdMRT6ybDJ8zfWPNqg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="110818206" Received: from dnelso2-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.125.110.154]) ([10.125.110.154]) by orviesa010-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2025 09:52:27 -0800 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 10:52:26 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] cxl: Refactor user ioctl command path from mds to mailbox To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, alison.schofield@intel.com, dave@stgolabs.net, jgg@nvidia.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com References: <20250204220430.4146187-1-dave.jiang@intel.com> <20250204220430.4146187-2-dave.jiang@intel.com> <20250205174123.00005885@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Dave Jiang In-Reply-To: <20250205174123.00005885@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/5/25 10:41 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 15:03:02 -0700 > Dave Jiang wrote: > >> With 'struct cxl_mailbox' context introduced, the helper functions >> cxl_query_cmd() and cxl_send_cmd() can take a cxl_mailbox directly >> rather than a cxl_memdev parameter. Refactor to use cxl_mailbox >> directly. >> >> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron >> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams >> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang >> --- > > Dave, maybe it's worth nibbling this one off the front of the series > and applying? Probably not a bad idea. I'll do that. > > Jonathan