Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@icloud.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] cxl/region: Prevent device_find_child() from modifying caller's match data
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 20:46:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dec374a6-073d-4b7f-9e83-adcfcf672852@icloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66c4a136d9764_2ddc2429435@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>

On 2024/8/20 21:59, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Zijun Hu wrote:
>> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
>>
>> To prepare for constifying the following old driver core API:
>>
>> struct device *device_find_child(struct device *dev, void *data,
>> 		int (*match)(struct device *dev, void *data));
>> to new:
>> struct device *device_find_child(struct device *dev, const void *data,
>> 		int (*match)(struct device *dev, const void *data));
>>
>> The new API does not allow its match function (*match)() to modify
>> caller's match data @*data, but match_free_decoder() as the old API's
>> match function indeed modifies relevant match data, so it is not
>> suitable for the new API any more, fixed by implementing a equivalent
>> cxl_device_find_child() instead of the old API usage.
> 
> Generally it seems ok but I think some name changes will make this more
> clear.  See below.
> 

okay.

> Also for those working on CXL I'm questioning the use of ID here and the
> dependence on the id's being added to the parent in order.  Is that a
> guarantee?
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> index 21ad5f242875..8d8f0637f7ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> @@ -134,6 +134,39 @@ static const struct attribute_group *get_cxl_region_access1_group(void)
>>  	return &cxl_region_access1_coordinate_group;
>>  }
>>  
>> +struct cxl_dfc_data {
> 
> struct cxld_match_data
> 
> 'cxld' == cxl decoder in our world.
> 

make sense.

>> +	int (*match)(struct device *dev, void *data);
>> +	void *data;
>> +	struct device *target_device;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int cxl_dfc_match_modify(struct device *dev, void *data)
> 
> Why not just put this logic into match_free_decoder?
> 

Actually, i ever considered solution B as you suggested in the end.

For this change, namely, solution A:
1) this change is clearer and easier to understand.
2) this change does not touch any existing cxld logic

For solution B:
it is more reasonable

i finally select A since it can express my concern and relevant solution
clearly.

>> +{
>> +	struct cxl_dfc_data *dfc_data = data;
>> +	int res;
>> +
>> +	res = dfc_data->match(dev, dfc_data->data);
>> +	if (res && get_device(dev)) {
>> +		dfc_data->target_device = dev;
>> +		return res;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * I have the same function as device_find_child() but allow to modify
>> + * caller's match data @*data.
>> + */
> 
> No need for this comment after the new API is established.
> 

i have given up the idea within v1 to introduce a new API which *should
ONLY* be used by this patch series, so it is not worthy of a new API
even if it can bring convenient for this patch series.

>> +static struct device *cxl_device_find_child(struct device *parent, void *data,
>> +					    int (*match)(struct device *dev, void *data))
>> +{
>> +	struct cxl_dfc_data dfc_data = {match, data, NULL};
>> +
>> +	device_for_each_child(parent, &dfc_data, cxl_dfc_match_modify);
>> +	return dfc_data.target_device;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static ssize_t uuid_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>>  			 char *buf)
>>  {
>> @@ -849,7 +882,8 @@ cxl_region_find_decoder(struct cxl_port *port,
>>  		dev = device_find_child(&port->dev, &cxlr->params,
>>  					match_auto_decoder);
>>  	else
>> -		dev = device_find_child(&port->dev, &id, match_free_decoder);
>> +		dev = cxl_device_find_child(&port->dev, &id,
>> +					    match_free_decoder);
> 
> This is too literal.  How about the following (passes basic cxl-tests).
> 

it is reasonable.

do you need me to submit that you suggest in the end and add you as
co-developer ?

OR

you submit it by yourself ?

either is okay for me.

> Ira
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c              
> index 21ad5f242875..c1e46254efb8 100644                                         
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c                                                 
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c                                                 
> @@ -794,10 +794,15 @@ static size_t show_targetN(struct cxl_region *cxlr, char *buf, int pos)
>         return rc;                                                              
>  }                                                                              
>                                                                                 
> +struct cxld_match_data {                                                       
> +       int id;                                                                 
> +       struct device *target_device;                                           
> +};                                                                             
> +                                                                               
>  static int match_free_decoder(struct device *dev, void *data)                  
>  {                                                                              
> +       struct cxld_match_data *match_data = data;                              
>         struct cxl_decoder *cxld;                                               
> -       int *id = data;                                                         
>                                                                                 
>         if (!is_switch_decoder(dev))                                            
>                 return 0;                                                       
> @@ -805,17 +810,30 @@ static int match_free_decoder(struct device *dev, void *data)
>         cxld = to_cxl_decoder(dev);                                             
>                                                                                 
>         /* enforce ordered allocation */                                        
> -       if (cxld->id != *id)                                                    
> +       if (cxld->id != match_data->id)                                         
>                 return 0;                                                       
>                                                                                 
> -       if (!cxld->region)                                                      
> +       if (!cxld->region && get_device(dev)) {                                 

get_device(dev) failure may cause different logic against existing
but i think it should be impossible to happen normally.

> +               match_data->target_device = dev;                                
>                 return 1;                                                       
> +       }                                                                       
>                                                                                 
> -       (*id)++;                                                                
> +       match_data->id++;                                                       
>                                                                                 
>         return 0;                                                               
>  }                                                                              
>                                                                                 
> +static struct device *find_free_decoder(struct device *parent)                 
> +{                                                                              
> +       struct cxld_match_data match_data = {                                   
> +               .id = 0,                                                        
> +               .target_device = NULL,                                          
> +       };                                                                      
> +                                                                               
> +       device_for_each_child(parent, &match_data, match_free_decoder);         
> +       return match_data.target_device;                                        
> +}                                                                              
> +                                                                               
>  static int match_auto_decoder(struct device *dev, void *data)                  
>  {                                                                              
>         struct cxl_region_params *p = data;                                     
> @@ -840,7 +858,6 @@ cxl_region_find_decoder(struct cxl_port *port,              
>                         struct cxl_region *cxlr)                                
>  {                                                                              
>         struct device *dev;                                                     
> -       int id = 0;                                                             
>                                                                                 
>         if (port == cxled_to_port(cxled))                                       
>                 return &cxled->cxld;                                            
> @@ -849,7 +866,8 @@ cxl_region_find_decoder(struct cxl_port *port,              
>                 dev = device_find_child(&port->dev, &cxlr->params,              
>                                         match_auto_decoder);                    
>         else                                                                    
> -               dev = device_find_child(&port->dev, &id, match_free_decoder);   
> +               dev = find_free_decoder(&port->dev);                            
> +                                                                               
>         if (!dev)                                                               
>                 return NULL;                                                    
>         /*                                                                      


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-21 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-15 14:58 [PATCH v2 0/4] driver core: Prevent device_find_child() from modifying caller's match data Zijun Hu
2024-08-15 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] driver core: Make parameter check consistent for API cluster device_(for_each|find)_child() Zijun Hu
2024-08-20 12:53   ` Ira Weiny
2024-08-20 13:40     ` Zijun Hu
2024-08-20 14:14       ` Ira Weiny
2024-08-21 14:44         ` Zijun Hu
2024-08-23 17:19           ` Ira Weiny
2024-08-23 21:45             ` Zijun Hu
2024-08-24  3:21           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-08-24  3:23   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-08-15 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] cxl/region: Prevent device_find_child() from modifying caller's match data Zijun Hu
2024-08-20 13:59   ` Ira Weiny
2024-08-21 12:46     ` Zijun Hu [this message]
2024-08-23 18:10       ` Ira Weiny
2024-08-23 22:18         ` Zijun Hu
2024-08-24  3:29     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-08-15 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] firewire: core: " Zijun Hu
2024-08-17  9:57   ` Takashi Sakamoto
2024-08-18 14:24     ` Zijun Hu
2024-08-19  8:58       ` Takashi Sakamoto
2024-08-19 11:41         ` Zijun Hu
2024-08-15 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] net: qcom/emac: " Zijun Hu
2024-08-24  3:29   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-08-24  7:11     ` Zijun Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dec374a6-073d-4b7f-9e83-adcfcf672852@icloud.com \
    --to=zijun_hu@icloud.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=timur@kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox