From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>,
dave@stgolabs.net, jic23@kernel.org, alison.schofield@intel.com,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com
Cc: iweiny@kernel.org, ming.li@zohomail.com, gourry@gourry.net,
rrichter@amd.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kees@kernel.org,
newtonl@nvidia.com, kristinc@nvidia.com, kaihengf@nvidia.com,
kobak@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] cxl/fwctl: Propagate feature RPC delivery errors
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 15:11:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3447007-4bc7-46f5-9bd5-f59b84d6113e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826014508.9989-8-icheng@nvidia.com>
On 8/25/26 6:45 PM, Richard Cheng wrote:
> FWCTL_RPC requires delivery failures to be returned as ioctl errors,
> while device errors are reported in the output. Get and Set Feature
> instead converted all failures into normal responses, sometimes with a
> SUCCESS device status.
>
> Initialize the return code to SUCCESS. When the helper fails without a
> device error code, return its errno. Continue reporting actual device
> errors through rpc_out->retval.
>
> Fixes: 5908f3ed6dc2 ("cxl: Add support to handle user feature commands for get feature")
> Fixes: eb5dfcb9e36d ("cxl: Add support to handle user feature commands for set feature")
> Signed-off-by: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - Remove redundant CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SUCCESS assignments. (Dave Jiang)
>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/features.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/features.c b/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
> index 8d44ce829497..28b326df3398 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ ssize_t cxl_get_feature(struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox, const uuid_t *feat_uuid,
> int rc;
>
> if (return_code)
> - *return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_INPUT;
> + *return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SUCCESS;
>
> if (!feat_out || !feat_out_size)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -267,9 +267,6 @@ ssize_t cxl_get_feature(struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox, const uuid_t *feat_uuid,
> data_rcvd_size += mbox_cmd.size_out;
> } while (data_rcvd_size < feat_out_size);
>
> - if (return_code)
> - *return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SUCCESS;
> -
> return data_rcvd_size;
> }
>
> @@ -289,7 +286,7 @@ int cxl_set_feature(struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox,
> size_t hdr_size;
>
> if (return_code)
> - *return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_INPUT;
> + *return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SUCCESS;
>
> if (feat_data_size > U16_MAX - offset)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -341,8 +338,6 @@ int cxl_set_feature(struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox,
>
> data_sent_size += data_in_size;
> if (data_sent_size >= feat_data_size) {
> - if (return_code)
> - *return_code = CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SUCCESS;
> return 0;
> }
Minor. the {} can now go.
>
> @@ -492,6 +487,9 @@ static void *cxlctl_get_feature(struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs,
> data_size = cxl_get_feature(cxl_mbox, &feat_in->uuid,
> feat_in->selection, rpc_out->payload,
> count, offset, &return_code);
> + if (data_size < 0 &&
Do we need to handle the 'data_size == 0' case here?
> + return_code == CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SUCCESS)
> + return ERR_PTR(data_size);
> *out_len = sizeof(struct fwctl_rpc_cxl_out);
> if (data_size <= 0) {
> rpc_out->size = 0;
> @@ -544,6 +542,8 @@ static void *cxlctl_set_feature(struct cxl_features_state *cxlfs,
> rc = cxl_set_feature(cxl_mbox, &feat_in->uuid,
> feat_in->version, feat_in->feat_data,
> data_size, flags, offset, &return_code);
> + if (rc && return_code == CXL_MBOX_CMD_RC_SUCCESS)
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
> *out_len = sizeof(*rpc_out);
> if (rc) {
> rpc_out->retval = return_code;
We may also need to add something like this because of the change of default return code. The code segment is similar to cxl_xfer_log().
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/features.c b/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
index 28b326df3398..2e62f3720072 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/features.c
@@ -259,6 +259,17 @@ ssize_t cxl_get_feature(struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox, const uuid_t *feat_uuid,
.min_out = data_to_rd_size,
};
rc = cxl_internal_send_cmd(cxl_mbox, &mbox_cmd);
+ /*
+ * Per CXL r4.0 8.2.10.6.2, when Offset + Count runs past the
+ * end of the Feature the device returns only the bytes up to
+ * the Feature size. cxl_internal_send_cmd() reports that as
+ * -EIO with a short payload, so stop and return what arrived.
+ */
+ if (rc == -EIO && mbox_cmd.size_out &&
+ mbox_cmd.size_out < data_to_rd_size) {
+ data_rcvd_size += mbox_cmd.size_out;
+ break;
+ }
if (rc < 0 || !mbox_cmd.size_out) {
if (return_code)
*return_code = mbox_cmd.return_code;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 1:45 [PATCH v6 0/7] cxl: Sashiko bug fixes Richard Cheng
2026-08-26 1:45 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] cxl/features: Reject feature offset that overflows 16-bit field Richard Cheng
2026-08-27 22:55 ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-26 1:45 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] cxl/region: Scan all partitions for unmapped poison Richard Cheng
2026-08-26 1:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 1:45 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] cxl/region: Don't leak tolerated RAM -EFAULT from unmapped poison scan Richard Cheng
2026-08-26 1:45 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] cxl/region: Start unmapped poison scan at the committed decoder boundary Richard Cheng
2026-08-28 17:56 ` Alison Schofield
2026-08-26 1:45 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] cxl/memdev: Don't overwrite the error from an earlier partition poison query Richard Cheng
2026-08-26 1:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 1:45 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] cxl/region: Reject poison scan for decoder without a partition Richard Cheng
2026-08-26 1:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 1:45 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] cxl/fwctl: Propagate feature RPC delivery errors Richard Cheng
2026-08-27 22:11 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2026-08-28 8:38 ` Richard Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3447007-4bc7-46f5-9bd5-f59b84d6113e@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kaihengf@nvidia.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kristinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox