From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Miklos Szeredi" <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] fuse: add extent map I/O support
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 18:22:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-162337@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006180115.1425232-9-mszeredi@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] fuse: fsync skips CPU cache flushing and metadata sync for EXTMAP DAX
- [High] fuse: dax_iomap_fault stubs return -EIO instead of valid vm_fault_t
- [Medium] fuse: incorrect -EFBIG error on write past EOF for EXTMAP DAX
--
commit 6c74cf2f1c1750d6fe1df2fa7ef25325ee0d117e
Author: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
fuse: add extent map I/O support
This commit wires up read, write, splice, and mmap operations for
extent-mapped files using the iomap and DAX infrastructure. When a
passthrough file is opened with an EXTMAP backing, I/O is dispatched
to the associated DAX devices.
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/ext_map.c b/fs/fuse/ext_map.c
> index 39d7bb521873c..4f418185c0b79 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/ext_map.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/ext_map.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,14 @@
> #include "fuse_i.h"
> #include <linux/rbtree.h>
> #include <linux/pagemap.h>
> +#include <linux/iomap.h>
> +#include <linux/dax.h>
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_FS_DAX
> +#define dax_iomap_rw(...) (-EIO)
> +#define dax_iomap_fault(...) (-EIO)
> +#define dax_finish_sync_fault(...) (-EIO)
> +#endif
[Severity: High]
Can returning -EIO here cause memory management fault handler corruption?
When CONFIG_FS_DAX is disabled, these macros stub out the DAX fault
handlers to return -EIO. However, the return type of the fault handlers
is vm_fault_t, which expects a bitmask of VM_FAULT_* flags (such as
VM_FAULT_SIGBUS).
Returning a negative integer like -EIO is interpreted as setting almost
all VM_FAULT_x bits simultaneously. This might lead to unpredictable
kernel behavior or infinite fault loops when handled by the core memory
management fault logic.
[ ... ]
> +static vm_fault_t fuse_ext_map_huge_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned int order)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(vmf->vma->vm_file);
> + bool write_fault = (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && (vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED);
> + vm_fault_t ret;
> + unsigned long pfn;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_DAX(inode)))
> + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> +
[ ... ]
> +
> + filemap_invalidate_lock_shared(inode->i_mapping);
> +
> + ret = dax_iomap_fault(vmf, order, &pfn, NULL, &fuse_ext_map_iomap_ops);
> + if (ret & VM_FAULT_NEEDDSYNC)
> + ret = dax_finish_sync_fault(vmf, order, pfn);
> +
> + filemap_invalidate_unlock_shared(inode->i_mapping);
> +
> + if (write_fault)
> + sb_end_pagefault(inode->i_sb);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +ssize_t fuse_ext_map_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> +{
> + ssize_t res;
> +
> + res = generic_write_checks(iocb, from);
> + if (res <= 0)
> + return res;
> +
> + fuse_rw_clamp(iocb, from);
> +
> + if (!iov_iter_count(from))
> + return -EFBIG;
[Severity: Medium]
Is -EFBIG the correct error code to return for writes past the end of an
extent-mapped file?
The fuse_rw_clamp() call truncates the iterator if the write starts at or
beyond the current file size. Returning -EFBIG in this condition maps a
standard EOF or out-of-space scenario to a file too large error.
POSIX semantics generally expect -ENOSPC or 0 (a short write) when writing
past a non-extensible block device or fixed-size mapping. Returning -EFBIG
might cause applications like cp or dd to fail incorrectly or inadvertently
trigger a SIGXFSZ signal.
> +
> + res = kiocb_modified(iocb);
> + if (res)
> + return res;
> +
> + return dax_iomap_rw(iocb, from, &fuse_ext_map_iomap_ops);
> +}
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index b5bef7b9e466e..b5c66f63acd02 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -551,6 +551,10 @@ static int fuse_fsync(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
> if (fuse_is_bad(inode))
> return -EIO;
>
> + /* Skip sync for DAX inodes */
> + if (IS_DAX(inode) && !fuse_inode_vdax(inode))
> + return 0;
[Severity: High]
Does this early return bypass CPU cache flushing and metadata sync for
EXTMAP DAX files?
For FUSE passthrough EXTMAP files, IS_DAX(inode) will be true, but
fuse_inode_vdax(inode) evaluates to false since vdax is specific to the
traditional virtio-fs DAX window.
Returning 0 here completely skips file_write_and_wait_range(), which is
needed to flush CPU caches for DAX memory via dax_writeback_mapping_range().
It also skips sync_inode_metadata(), which syncs metadata updates to the
FUSE server. This bypass could cause CPU-cached DAX writes to be lost on a
crash, violating DAX durability guarantees.
> +
> inode_lock(inode);
>
> /*
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261006180115.1425232-1-mszeredi@redhat.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 18:01 [PATCH v3 0/9] fuse: DAX device based extent maps (famfs) Miklos Szeredi
2026-10-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] dax: replace exported dax_dev_get() with non-allocating dax_dev_find() Miklos Szeredi
2026-10-06 18:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] dax: use READ_ONCE() in dax_holder() Miklos Szeredi
2026-10-06 18:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 1:02 ` Alison Schofield
2026-10-08 6:58 ` Miklos Szeredi
2026-10-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] fuse: add helpers for EIO return value with kernel message Miklos Szeredi
2026-10-06 21:03 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-10-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] fuse: support 64 bit, server allocated backing ID Miklos Szeredi
2026-10-06 18:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 20:10 ` John Groves
2026-10-07 12:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
2026-10-06 22:08 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-10-07 12:54 ` Miklos Szeredi
2026-10-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] fuse: support opening 64 bit " Miklos Szeredi
2026-10-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] fuse: add support for opening dax device as backing Miklos Szeredi
2026-10-06 18:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] fuse: add extent map data structure Miklos Szeredi
2026-10-06 18:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] fuse: add extent map I/O support Miklos Szeredi
2026-10-06 18:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] fuse: add support for striped backing Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-162337@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox