From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Zhigang.Luo@amd.com, arun.george@samsung.com, balbirs@nvidia.com,
brendan.jackman@linux.dev, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
apopple@nvidia.com, alucerop@amd.com, matthew.brost@intel.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, corbet@lwn.net,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, djbw@kernel.org,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, osandov@osandov.com,
jannh@google.com, pfalcato@suse.de, jackmanb@google.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, ziy@nvidia.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
osalvador@suse.de, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, rakie.kim@sk.com,
byungchul@sk.com, gourry@gourry.net,
ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, kasong@tencent.com,
qi.zheng@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, baohua@kernel.org,
axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com,
yury.norov@gmail.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
longman@redhat.com, ridong.chen@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org,
mkoutny@suse.com, sj@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, peterx@redhat.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, npache@redhat.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, lance.yang@linux.dev,
usama.arif@linux.dev, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn,
chengming.zhou@linux.dev, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
linux-debuggers@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 23/36] mm/mempolicy: apply policy at the kernel zone for private-node binds
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:34:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720193431.3841992-24-gourry@gourry.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720193431.3841992-1-gourry@gourry.net>
apply_policy_zone() raises dynamic_policy_zone to ZONE_MOVABLE when none
of a policy's nodes have non-movable memory, so a bind to movable-only
node does not force kernel-zone allocations onto a zone that cannot
satisfy them - resulting retries forever (livelock).
The current code uses N_HIGH_MEMORY to denote eligibility, but private
nodes are deliberately not in N_HIGH_MEMORY nor N_NORMAL_MEMORY. This
means a private node onlined into ZONE_NORMAL is judged as movable-only.
This means a policy set with set_mempolicy() binding a private node with
ZONE_NORMAL memory will shunt otherwise eligible allocations (like the
task's page tables) back to N_MEMORY nodes.
This also becomes relevant for in-kernel users that want non-movable
memory (such as KVM placing pinned VM memory solely on a private node).
Add policy_private_has_kernel_zone() to consult the actual zones of
the policy's private nodes and keep the policy applied at lower zones
when a kernel-zoned private node can satisfy the allocation.
Only a mempolicy binding a private node pays the zone scan, all other
mempolicies preserve fast-path performance.
Additionally: update the comments in apply_policy_zone for clarity,
because this particular policy mechanism is very confusing.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 90110e9761122..e83c2c7a94c1d 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2091,6 +2091,34 @@ bool vma_policy_mof(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
return mof;
}
+/*
+ * true if any policy *private* node can satisfy a !__GFP_MOVABLE allocation.
+ * Policies without private nodes (~MPOL_F_PRIVATE) always return false.
+ *
+ * This provides a way for otherwise-bound kernel allocations to make their
+ * way onto private nodes with ZONE_NORMAL memory without having to audit
+ * every caller. The cost is a zone scan for private nodes in the mask.
+ */
+static bool policy_private_has_kernel_zone(const struct mempolicy *pol)
+{
+ int nid;
+
+ if (!(pol->flags & MPOL_F_PRIVATE))
+ return false;
+
+ for_each_node_mask(nid, pol->nodes) {
+ pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
+ enum zone_type zt;
+
+ if (!node_is_private(nid))
+ continue;
+ for (zt = ZONE_NORMAL; zt < ZONE_MOVABLE; zt++)
+ if (managed_zone(&pgdat->node_zones[zt]))
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
bool apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type zone)
{
enum zone_type dynamic_policy_zone = policy_zone;
@@ -2098,14 +2126,22 @@ bool apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type zone)
BUG_ON(dynamic_policy_zone == ZONE_MOVABLE);
/*
- * if policy->nodes has movable memory only,
- * we apply policy when gfp_zone(gfp) = ZONE_MOVABLE only.
+ * dynamic_policy_zone is the lowest zone this policy is enforced for,
+ * allocations below it ignore the nodemask and fall back freely.
+ *
+ * If all policy-nodes are movable-only (all ZONE_MOVABLE), raise the
+ * dynamic_policy_zone to ZONE_MOVABLE so that only movable allocations
+ * stay bound - otherwise this would force kernel-zone allocations
+ * (e.g. page tables) onto a zone that cannot satisfy them. This
+ * results in allocation failure and retry loop (livelock).
*
- * policy->nodes is intersect with node_states[N_MEMORY].
- * so if the following test fails, it implies
- * policy->nodes has movable memory only.
+ * N_HIGH_MEMORY tells us "has a non-movable zone" for ordinary nodes.
+ * Private nodes are deliberately excluded from N_HIGH_MEMORY, so we
+ * need to check their actual zones - a kernel-zoned private node can
+ * hold the allocation and must keep the policy applied.
*/
- if (!nodes_intersects(policy->nodes, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]))
+ if (!nodes_intersects(policy->nodes, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]) &&
+ !policy_private_has_kernel_zone(policy))
dynamic_policy_zone = ZONE_MOVABLE;
return zone >= dynamic_policy_zone;
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20260720193443epcas5p167fa7d8490edfb4d8c0aa6a259db058f@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 00/36] Private Memory NUMA Nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 01/36] mm: refactor find_next_best_node to find_next_best_node_in Gregory Price
2026-07-21 5:46 ` Balbir Singh
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 02/36] mm/page_alloc: refactor build_node_zonelist() out of build_zonelists() Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 03/36] mm/page_alloc: let the bulk and folio allocators carry alloc_flags Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 04/36] numa: introduce N_MEMORY_PRIVATE Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 05/36] mm: add ZONELIST_PRIVATE(_NOFALLBACK) for N_MEMORY_PRIVATE nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-22 13:00 ` Richard Cheng
2026-07-22 13:19 ` Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 06/36] cpuset: exclude private nodes from cpuset.mems (default-open) Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 07/36] mm/memory_hotplug: disallow migration-driven private node hotunplug Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 08/36] mm/mempolicy: skip private node folios when queueing for migration Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 09/36] mm/migrate: disallow userland driven migration for private nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 10/36] mm/madvise: disallow madvise operations on private node folios Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 11/36] mm/compaction: disallow compaction on private nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 12/36] mm/page_alloc: clear private node watermarks and system reserves Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 13/36] mm/mempolicy: disallow NUMA Balancing prot_none on private nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 14/36] mm/damon: skip private node memory in DAMON migration and pageout Gregory Price
2026-07-21 23:46 ` SJ Park
2026-07-22 12:16 ` Gregory Price
2026-07-23 0:19 ` SJ Park
2026-07-23 3:25 ` Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 15/36] mm/ksm: skip KSM for managed-memory folios Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 16/36] mm/khugepaged: skip private node folios when trying to collapse Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 17/36] mm/vmscan: disallow reclaim of private node memory Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 18/36] mm/gup: disallow longterm pin of private node folios Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 19/36] proc: include N_MEMORY_PRIVATE nodes in numa_maps output Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 20/36] mm/memcontrol: account private-node memory in per-node stats Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 21/36] proc/kcore: include private-node RAM in the kcore RAM map Gregory Price
2026-07-20 20:05 ` Omar Sandoval
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 22/36] mm/mempolicy: add MPOL_F_PRIVATE and zonelist selection Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 24/36] mm/mempolicy: add in-kernel MPOL_BIND interfaces for drivers/services Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 25/36] mm/memory_hotplug: support N_MEMORY_PRIVATE node hotplug Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 26/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_RECLAIM for opted-in private node reclaim Gregory Price
2026-07-22 13:36 ` Richard Cheng
2026-07-22 13:48 ` Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 27/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_USER_NUMA for userland numa controls Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 28/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_HOTUNPLUG for opted-in private nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-22 14:04 ` Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 29/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_DEMOTION for private-node tiering demotion Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 30/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_NUMA_BALANCING for private-node NUMA balancing Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 31/36] mm: add NODE_PRIVATE_CAP_LTPIN for private node folio pinning Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 32/36] mm/khugepaged: base private node collapse eligiblity on actor/cap bits Gregory Price
2026-07-22 13:24 ` Richard Cheng
2026-07-22 13:43 ` Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 33/36] Documentation/mm: describe private (N_MEMORY_PRIVATE) memory nodes Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 34/36] mm/mempolicy: add mpol_set_shared_policy_range() Gregory Price
2026-07-20 19:34 ` [PATCH v5 35/36] KVM: guest_memfd: bind backing memory to a NUMA node at creation Gregory Price
2026-07-21 3:46 ` [PATCH v5 00/36] Private Memory NUMA Nodes Balbir Singh
2026-07-21 18:16 ` Gregory Price
2026-07-22 8:29 ` Balbir Singh
2026-07-22 12:28 ` Gregory Price
2026-07-21 13:26 ` Zenghui Yu
2026-07-21 17:18 ` Gregory Price
2026-07-22 14:20 ` Richard Cheng
2026-07-22 15:40 ` Gregory Price
2026-07-22 20:56 ` Gregory Price
2026-07-23 8:38 ` Arun George/Arun George
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720193431.3841992-24-gourry@gourry.net \
--to=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=Zhigang.Luo@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=alucerop@amd.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=arun.george@samsung.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-debuggers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox