Linux debuggers
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Brennan <stephen@brennan.io>
To: Christian Heusel <gromit@archlinux.org>
Cc: linux-debuggers@vger.kernel.org,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
	Petr Tesarik <petr@tesarici.cz>
Subject: Re: drgn 0.0.30 and libkdumpfile 0.5.5 incompatibility in Arch
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:31:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734i1lips.fsf@brennan.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875xmxljst.fsf@brennan.io>

Stephen Brennan <stephen@brennan.io> writes:
> Hi Christian,
>
> I think you may already be aware of this, but I wanted to let you know
> that there's an incompatibility with drgn 0.0.30-2 and libkdumpfile
> 0.5.5-1 on Arch. libkdumpfile 0.5.5 changed some APIs in a
> backward-incompatible way. Building drgn against the new version fails,
> and running a version built against 0.5.4 of course fails due to the
> soname change. The current drgn 0.0.30-2 on Arch's repositories was
> built against 0.5.4.
>
> Thus a user installing drgn & libkdumpfile on Arch, who is fully
> up-to-date, gets this:
>
> ImportError: libkdumpfile.so.10: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> The incompatibility is fixed in drgn's main branch by the changes in
> [1]. Unfortunately, that was merged after drgn 0.0.30 was released.
> Some major changes have been merged since then, so I don't think a
> 0.0.31 release is likely for a few months. So I think it may be a good
> idea to carry the two commits in [1] as downstream patches in a new
> 0.0.30-3 release. I'd be happy to implement those changes if it'd help.
>
> I'm Ccing the linux-debuggers mailing list for posterity, as well as
> Omar and Petr as an FYI.
>
> Thanks,
> Stephen
>
> [1]: https://github.com/osandov/drgn/pull/452


Sorry, I was a bit mistaken here:

1. drgn 0.0.30 DOES build successfully with libkdumpfile 0.5.5. I
misread the changes there. As far as I can tell, there may be a small
memory leak when using 0.0.30 with 0.5.5, but nothing major.

2. I'd say the best way forward would be a simple rebuild of drgn
against libkdumpfile 0.5.5.

Thanks,
Stephen

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-02  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-02  8:08 drgn 0.0.30 and libkdumpfile 0.5.5 incompatibility in Arch Stephen Brennan
2025-01-02  8:31 ` Stephen Brennan [this message]
2025-01-02  8:57   ` Christian Heusel
2025-01-02 13:57     ` Petr Tesařík
2025-01-02 14:13       ` Christian Heusel
2025-01-02 17:22     ` Stephen Brennan
2025-01-02  8:58   ` Petr Tesařík

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8734i1lips.fsf@brennan.io \
    --to=stephen@brennan.io \
    --cc=gromit@archlinux.org \
    --cc=linux-debuggers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=petr@tesarici.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox