Re: [PATCH CRASH] Fix module section load address when sh_addr != 0

[Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>]

On 4/17/25 18:43, lijiang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 4:18 PM Tao Liu <ltao@redhat.com
> <mailto:ltao@redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Stephen,
> 
>     On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 12:30 PM Stephen Brennan
>     <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com <mailto:stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>>
>     wrote:
>     >
>     > Hi Tao,
>     >
>     > Thanks for digging through the code with me. I'm not very confident or
>     > familiar with it, so I don't have 100% confident answers, but I'll
>     do my
>     > best to answer:
> 
>     Thanks for your explanation! I think your modification is reasonable
>     and I have run tests against your patch, no regression is found.
>     Though I still haven't figured out whether it is a gdb issue or crash
>     specific, however I think it is OK to accept your patch for now. So I
>     will ack your No.1 and No.2 patch. Though No.2 patch needs some
>     cleanup on the code, but I think that is just a minor change, I have
>     no objection to its major part.
> 
>     So ack.
> 
> 
>  Applied:
> [1] https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/
> commit/2cf1a93805a8df6a2a4b7fde8d57b6d873c1bbeb <https://github.com/
> crash-utility/crash/commit/2cf1a93805a8df6a2a4b7fde8d57b6d873c1bbeb>
> [2] https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/
> b982ddc4d66dcd59e567201428eb6191e4a24695 <https://github.com/crash-
> utility/crash/commit/b982ddc4d66dcd59e567201428eb6191e4a24695>
> 
> BTW: regenerated the patch for [2].

Thank you!
Stephen

> 
> Thanks
> Lianbo
> 
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Tao Liu
>