From: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
To: 'Zhou Wang' <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Cc: 'Bjorn Helgaas' <bhelgaas@google.com>,
'Pratyush Anand' <pratyush.anand@gmail.com>,
'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@arndb.de>,
'Liviu Dudau' <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
'Gabriele Paoloni' <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>,
'Zhichang Yuan' <yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com>,
zhudacai@hisilicon.com, 'Zhang Jukuo' <zhangjukuo@huawei.com>,
qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com, 'Liguozhu' <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
'Kishon Vijay Abraham I' <kishon@ti.com>,
'Richard Zhu' <Richard.Zhu@freescale.com>,
'Lucas Stach' <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 14:10:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001d096a9$27bf43f0$773dcbd0$@com> (raw)
On Wed, 20 May 2015 14:21:39 +0800, Zhou Wang wrote:
>
> This patch tries to unify ARM32 and ARM64 PCIe in designware driver. Delete
> function dw_pcie_setup, dw_pcie_scan_bus, dw_pcie_map_irq and struct hw_pci,
> move related operations to dw_pcie_host_init.
>
> I am not very clear about I/O resource management:
> > if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
> > pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
> > global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
> > pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
> > global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
> > }
> so just move steps in dw_pcie_setup to dw_pcie_host_init.
>
> I have compiled the driver with multi_v7_defconfig. However, I don't have
> ARM32 PCIe related board to do test. It will be appreciated if someone could
> help to test it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 128 +++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> index 2e9f84f..7bad9e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <asm/hardirq.h>
+cc Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Richard Zhu, Lucas Stach
Please use <linux/hardirq.h> and insert it alphabetically.
+#include <linux/hardirq.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
>
> #include "pcie-designware.h"
>
> @@ -67,17 +68,10 @@
> #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC(x) (((x) & 0x7) << 16)
> #define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET 0x91C
>
> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci;
> +static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops;
>
> static unsigned long global_io_offset;
>
> -static inline struct pcie_port *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> -{
> - BUG_ON(!sys->private_data);
> -
> - return sys->private_data;
> -}
> -
> int dw_pcie_cfg_read(void __iomem *addr, int where, int size, u32 *val)
> {
> *val = readl(addr);
> @@ -238,7 +232,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
> static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
> {
> int irq, pos0, i;
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(desc->dev->bus->sysdata);
> + struct pcie_port *pp = desc->dev->bus->sysdata;
>
> pos0 = bitmap_find_free_region(pp->msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS,
> order_base_2(no_irqs));
> @@ -281,7 +275,7 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
> {
> int irq, pos;
> struct msi_msg msg;
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(pdev->bus->sysdata);
> + struct pcie_port *pp = pdev->bus->sysdata;
>
> if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -310,7 +304,7 @@ static void dw_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, unsigned int irq)
> {
> struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> struct msi_desc *msi = irq_data_get_msi(data);
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(msi->dev->bus->sysdata);
> + struct pcie_port *pp = msi->dev->bus->sysdata;
>
> clear_irq_range(pp, irq, 1, data->hwirq);
> }
> @@ -342,13 +336,15 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
> .map = dw_pcie_msi_map,
> };
>
> -int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> +int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> {
> struct device_node *np = pp->dev->of_node;
> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pp->dev);
> struct of_pci_range range;
> struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
> + struct pci_bus *bus;
> struct resource *cfg_res;
> + LIST_HEAD(res);
> u32 val, na, ns;
> const __be32 *addrp;
> int i, index, ret;
> @@ -502,15 +498,49 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> val |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
> dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, 4, val);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> - dw_pcie_msi_chip.dev = pp->dev;
> - dw_pci.msi_ctrl = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> + /*
> + * FIXME: we should really be able to use
> + * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources on arm32 as well,
> + * but the conversion needs some more testing
> + */
> + if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
> + pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
> + global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
> + pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
> + global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
> + }
> + pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->mem,
> + pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr);
> + pci_add_resource(&res, &pp->busn);
> +#else
> + ret = of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(np, 0, 0xff, &res, &pp->io_base);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +#endif
> +
> + bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops,
> + pp, &res);
> + if (!bus)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
> + bus->msi = container_of(&pp->irq_domain, struct msi_controller, domain);
> +#else
> + bus->msi = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
> #endif
>
> - dw_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
> - dw_pci.private_data = (void **)&pp;
> + pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> + if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
> + pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>
> - pci_common_init_dev(pp->dev, &dw_pci);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> + /* support old dtbs that incorrectly describe IRQs */
> + pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
> +#endif
> +
> + pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
> + pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -653,7 +683,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_valid_config(struct pcie_port *pp,
> static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
> int size, u32 *val)
> {
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
> + struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
> int ret;
>
> if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0) {
> @@ -677,7 +707,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
> static int dw_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
> int where, int size, u32 val)
> {
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
> + struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
> int ret;
>
> if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0)
> @@ -701,64 +731,6 @@ static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> .write = dw_pcie_wr_conf,
> };
>
> -static int dw_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> -{
> - struct pcie_port *pp;
> -
> - pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
> -
> - if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
> - sys->io_offset = global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr;
> - pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
> - global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
> - pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->io,
> - sys->io_offset);
> - }
> -
> - sys->mem_offset = pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr;
> - pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->mem, sys->mem_offset);
> - pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pp->busn);
> -
> - return 1;
> -}
> -
> -static struct pci_bus *dw_pcie_scan_bus(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> -{
> - struct pci_bus *bus;
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
> -
> - pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
'pp->root_bus_nr' is initialized as '-1' at some soc-specific drivers
However, 'sys->busnr' is set as '0, 1, 2 ...' by pcibios_init_hw()
in arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c. '0, 1, 2 ...' means the number of
each host controller.
So, without setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2, ...',
it makes the problem.
Thus, we need to come up with the way to resolve this.
1. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by each soc-specific driver.
e.g)
./drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int __init exynos_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
}
}
- pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
+ pp->root_bus_nr++;
pp->ops = &exynos_pcie_host_ops;
./drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int __init imx6_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
}
}
- pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
+ pp->root_bus_nr++;
pp->ops = &imx6_pcie_host_ops;
./drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int __init ks_add_pcie_port(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie,
return ret;
}
- pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
+ pp->root_bus_nr++;
pp->ops = &keystone_pcie_host_ops;
./drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int ls_add_pcie_port(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
pp = &pcie->pp;
pp->dev = pcie->dev;
pp->dbi_base = pcie->dbi;
- pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
+ pp->root_bus_nr++;
pp->ops = &ls_pcie_host_ops;
./drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int spear13xx_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
return ret;
}
- pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
+ pp->root_bus_nr++;
pp->ops = &spear13xx_pcie_host_ops;
2. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by pcie-designware.c
I believe that someone will give better idea. :-)
> - bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, sys->busnr,
> - &dw_pcie_ops, sys, &sys->resources);
> - if (!bus)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> -
> - if (bus && pp->ops->scan_bus)
> - pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
> -
> - return bus;
> -}
> -
> -static int dw_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
> -{
> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(dev->bus->sysdata);
> - int irq;
> -
> - irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, slot, pin);
> - if (!irq)
> - irq = pp->irq;
> -
> - return irq;
> -}
> -
> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci = {
> - .setup = dw_pcie_setup,
> - .scan = dw_pcie_scan_bus,
> - .map_irq = dw_pcie_map_irq,
> -};
Right, 'struct hw_pci' should not be used in order to unify ARM32 and
ARM64. I have no objection to remove 'struct hw_pci' from 'pcie-designware.c'.
Thank you for your patch.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
> -
> void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
> {
> u32 val;
> --
> 1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-25 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-25 5:10 Jingoo Han [this message]
2015-05-25 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support Zhou Wang
2015-05-25 13:48 ` Jingoo Han
2015-05-25 15:51 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-26 2:49 ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26 8:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 13:56 ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 15:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 15:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 16:19 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 19:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-28 11:48 ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 12:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-28 11:40 ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:34 ` Zhou Wang
[not found] ` <5566FD5C.4050708-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-28 12:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-26 8:03 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 13:24 ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:52 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-26 2:04 ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26 8:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 13:28 ` Zhou Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-20 6:21 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] PCI: hisi: Add PCIe host support for Hisilicon Soc Hip05 Zhou Wang
2015-05-20 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support Zhou Wang
2015-05-25 1:33 ` Zhou Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000001d096a9$27bf43f0$773dcbd0$@com' \
--to=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=Richard.Zhu@freescale.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=liguozhu@hisilicon.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=pratyush.anand@gmail.com \
--cc=qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhangjukuo@huawei.com \
--cc=zhudacai@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).