From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailout2.samsung.com (mailout2.samsung.com [203.254.224.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B17E26E70C for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 07:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.254.224.25 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756972278; cv=none; b=Ipotwhtj1jvDIYTK6GGU19vfzUemQ+ZzlxTy0OmdscwP8ax3fIn2rTCsacO4eZeb/pUGNvaKWlwSsUR1YDB6MJLcgVKAn1T2Rb4Vj8FqdtAqCXrI6LxrYiFjaaXHw9IyLcGLrVlDcJap03laaRYMoCClV6PZXBjlpmMU1GUJld8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756972278; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oX7UEOaFp5Z+f1WS5I2kIi2WzTYPeW2Lz1GRHyCpros=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:References; b=DRsaSr31GroY6FHBf/qXiViSU/jHhLGFkIlwA9TTOjfMsH9YBGKcBe8YKpy1jLy23qnZvVK1WMGM8mgSHvabeIzPbAqQrZqps4gUh4Qtr2Hv4lY7jaF4AoegO/VZtTiWXR8xH1Y9DXjl9ktw4aYOIKYcYhfD2L9r0+hDDdzNyvY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=samsung.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=samsung.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=samsung.com header.i=@samsung.com header.b=Gkk95YVG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.254.224.25 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=samsung.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=samsung.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=samsung.com header.i=@samsung.com header.b="Gkk95YVG" Received: from epcas5p4.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.41.42]) by mailout2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20250904075114epoutp026a1e285338776cd2e1f7087a4887891a~iBPmQV_NG1849818498epoutp020 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 07:51:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout2.samsung.com 20250904075114epoutp026a1e285338776cd2e1f7087a4887891a~iBPmQV_NG1849818498epoutp020 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com; s=mail20170921; t=1756972274; bh=BR2gZ2ua1hawq9ETTub8etbCtTRBasyb9bOMsgkE+5E=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:References:From; b=Gkk95YVGgKoh1+rYqdqaEg/PXdvf4qvbychJ0Od0sDf5pmCQyxJPCIe9Bm0iwK2es x/k2atHBSI/kz9oH2OdLuPxvFDZHUJdEVJ3Be8QFSzTWII5RQvBGI59YIx8XO3bFtl SoxvOqW+3GNP7UHyrZg/eGePJjDP8tRzDHu4zEtI= Received: from epsnrtp02.localdomain (unknown [182.195.42.154]) by epcas5p3.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPS id 20250904075113epcas5p394340cc759dc824bd310f5b5d72f2cdf~iBPliafs32306923069epcas5p3P; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 07:51:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from epcas5p4.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.38.89]) by epsnrtp02.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cHWrJ5Zw5z2SSKh; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 07:51:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from epsmtip2.samsung.com (unknown [182.195.34.31]) by epcas5p4.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPA id 20250904075112epcas5p49650dcfae9c59e1241751ea53f73fbcc~iBPj-8a8Q2959129591epcas5p47; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 07:51:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from INBRO001840 (unknown [107.122.3.105]) by epsmtip2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPA id 20250904075109epsmtip2fcfead067a25af3c3ad223ce40bbf198~iBPhGx2ni3175031750epsmtip2A; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 07:51:08 +0000 (GMT) From: "Pritam Manohar Sutar" To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , In-Reply-To: <20250904-interesting-lovely-ringtail-38bbef@kuoka> Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 13:21:07 +0530 Message-ID: <000001dc1d70$aebf7d80$0c3e7880$@samsung.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQIRMOVGdWg5oRjNsRBgEjzIeIB8IgGabj6EAmTXuDcB8lF0oLPo6zcQ Content-Language: en-in X-CMS-MailID: 20250904075112epcas5p49650dcfae9c59e1241751ea53f73fbcc X-Msg-Generator: CA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" CMS-TYPE: 105P cpgsPolicy: CPGSC10-542,Y X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CMS-RootMailID: 20250903072936epcas5p4a28d0e63c7f0792b516b0cbc68bf3a8e References: <20250903073827.3015662-1-pritam.sutar@samsung.com> <20250903073827.3015662-2-pritam.sutar@samsung.com> <20250904-interesting-lovely-ringtail-38bbef@kuoka> Hi Krzysztof, > -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski > Sent: 04 September 2025 12:18 PM > To: Pritam Manohar Sutar > Cc: vkoul=40kernel.org; kishon=40kernel.org; robh=40kernel.org; > krzk+dt=40kernel.org; conor+dt=40kernel.org; alim.akhtar=40samsung.com; > andre.draszik=40linaro.org; peter.griffin=40linaro.org; kauschluss=40disr= oot.org; > ivo.ivanov.ivanov1=40gmail.com; igor.belwon=40mentallysanemainliners.org; > m.szyprowski=40samsung.com; s.nawrocki=40samsung.com; linux- > phy=40lists.infradead.org; devicetree=40vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel=40vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel=40lists.infradead.org; linux-s= amsung- > soc=40vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila=40samsung.com; dev.tailor=40samsung.com; > faraz.ata=40samsung.com; muhammed.ali=40samsung.com; > selvarasu.g=40samsung.com > Subject: Re: =5BPATCH v8 1/6=5D dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: a= dd > ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible >=20 > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote: > > Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC. > > The > > USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so > > no driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a > > dedicated compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar >=20 > You just dropped all tags without explaining why. Regretted inconvenience.=20 There were significant changes in supplies' names in driver and schemas=20 (patch-set v8). This led to make changes in patch no 5. And review for=20 these changes is needed. Hence, removed RB tag in this patch-set.=20 There was a ask for the same https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/000401dc18cd= =24ec02a1b0=24c407e510=24=40samsung.com/=23:=7E:text=3DLet%20me%20know%2C%2= 0because%20of%20above%20changes%2C%20should%20be%20removing%20your%20%0A%27= reviewed%2Dby%27%20tag%20from%20patch%201%20and%203. This had to be captured in changelog along with other details. Will remembe= r to add details=20 in future, if any tags are removed.=20 However, do I need to send v9 with the details?=20 >=20 >
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. >=20 > It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. >=20 > If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions = of > patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed > significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is =22r= eceived=22, > when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like= b4 can > help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the t= ags. > The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version the= y apply. >=20 > Please read: > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=3D6abe7ac7-0bc392bf-6abff188- > 74fe485fffb1-49c70cea06738e63&q=3D1&e=3Dfc43c80a-8c7b-41b0-aa24- > 8cb76d954fe5&u=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv6.12- > rc3%2Fsource%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fsubmitting- > patches.rst%23L577 >=20 > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. >
>=20 > Best regards, > Krzysztof Thank you. Regards, Pritam