[PATCH v8 0/6] initial usbdrd phy support for Exynosautov920 soc

[PATCH v8 0/6] initial usbdrd phy support for Exynosautov920 soc

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

This SoC has a single USB 3.1 DRD combo phy and three USB2.0 only
DRD phy controllers as mentined below

  * Combo phy supports USB3.1 SSP+(10Gbps) protocol and is backwards
    compatible to the USB3.0 SS(5Gbps). 'Add-on USB2.0' phy is added
    to support USB2.0 HS(480Mbps), FS(12Mbps) and LS(1.5Mbps) data rates.
    These two phys are combined to form a combo phy as mentioned below.


   USB30DRD_0 port

 +------------------------------------------------------------+
 |                                                            |
 |                (combo) USB phy controller                  |
 |      +----------------------------------------------+      |
 |      |                  USB HSPHY                   |      |
 |      |  (samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-combo-hsphy) |      |
 |      +----------------------------------------------+      |
 |                                                            |
 |    +--------------------------------------------------+    |
 |    |                   USB SSPHY                      |    |
 |    |   (samsung,exynosautov920-usb31drd-combo-ssphy)  |    |
 |    +--------------------------------------------------+-   |
 |                                                            |
 +------------------------------------------------------------+
 |                                                            |
 |                     USBDRD30 Link                          |
 |                       Controller                           |
 +------------------------------------------------------------+

  * USB2.0 phy supports only UTMI+ interface. USB2.0DRD phy
    is very similar to the existing Exynos850 support in this driver.

    USB20DRD_0/1/2 ports

      +---------------------------------------------------+
      |                                                   |
      |                USB PHY controller                 |
      |    +-----------------------------------------+    |
      |    |              USB HSPHY                  |    |
      |    |  (samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy)    |    |
      |    +-----------------------------------------+    |
      |                                                   |
      +---------------------------------------------------+
      |                                                   |
      |             USBDRD20_* Link                       |
      |                Controller                         |
      |                                                   |
      +---------------------------------------------------+

The "USB20 phy output isolation" is shared across the USB20 phys.
We have to bypass isolation when any one of the USBs is configured
and enable it when all are turned off. The "USB31 phy isolation"
is seperate for USB31 phy.

This patchset only supports device mode and same is verified with
as NCM device

changelog
----------
Changes in v8:
- modified supplies' names in schema and driver.
- Since supplies' names are changed, modified patch no 5. to
  fix warnings in dtbs_check dt_binding_check.
- updated commit message for patch no. 1, 3 and 5 to describe
  hardware details.
  link for v7: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20250822093845.1179395-1-pritam.sutar@samsung.com/

Changes in v7:
- added fixes for driver build warnings
  link for v6: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20250821073703.2498302-1-pritam.sutar@samsung.com/

Changes in v6:
- added else part for new supplies in schemas those are only
  supported for exynosautov920.
- addressed comments for driver given in v5.
  link for v5: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20250805115216.3798121-1-pritam.sutar@samsung.com/

Changes in v5:
- significant changes were added in v4, removed "Reviewed-by" tag.
- addressed comments from v4 patchset.
  - patch (1/6)
    - DTS style is corrected and added required supplies in code/schema.
    - schema block added to resolve below failure during 'dtbs_check'.
      Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('dvdd075-usb-supply', 'vdd18-usb20-supply', 'vdd33-usb20-supply' were unexpected.
  - patch (2/6)
    - removed usage_counter(take this later in subsequent patch-sets)
  - patch (3/6)
    - There are 3 types of the phys in this SoC.
      - one is simmilar with exynos850 as mentioned in patch no.1.
      - second supports only USB3.1 SSP+ and denoted in patch no 5
      - third supports only USB2.0 HS as in patch3.
    - hs phy in combo phy is "NOT" same as phy. (in patch no. 1)
    - These three phys(usbdrd-phy, combo-hsphy, combo-ssphy) are totally
      deferent, "NOT" same, hence added three compatible for three phys.
  - patch (5/6)
    - Since there are two phys in combo phy, explaination is given
      in each patch.
  link for v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20250701120706.2219355-1-pritam.sutar@samsung.com/

Changes in v4:
- addressed comments from v3 patchset
  - removed dts related patches, to be posted in new patchset.
  - added regulator, pmu and power sequences.
  - phy isol is shared across USBs, added usage counter to bypass or
    enable phy isolation.
  - modified schemas with hs and combo phy compatible names
    (used "combo" to denote combo phy) and regulators
- modified code to work with binding and unbinding devices/drivers
- added "Reviewed-by" tag.
  link for v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20250613055613.866909-1-pritam.sutar@samsung.com/

Changes in v3:
- Updated dt-bindings for USB2.0 only.
- Added dt-bindings for combo phy.
- Added implementation for combo phy (SS and HS phy).
- Added added DTS nodes for all the phys
  link for v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20250516102650.2144487-1-pritam.sutar@samsung.com/

Changes in v2:
- Used standard GENMASK() and FIELD_GET() to get the major version
  from controller version register.
  link for v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20250514134813.380807-1-pritam.sutar@samsung.com/

Pritam Manohar Sutar (6):
  dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy
    compatible
  phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support HS phy for ExynosAutov920
  dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 combo hsphy
  phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support HS combo phy for ExynosAutov920
  dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 combo ssphy
  phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support SS combo phy for ExynosAutov920

 .../bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml    |  48 ++
 drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c      | 651 ++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h   |   3 +
 3 files changed, 702 insertions(+)

-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC. The
USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so no
driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a dedicated
compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.

Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
---
 .../bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml    | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
index e906403208c0..8d8114eb5660 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ properties:
       - samsung,exynos7870-usbdrd-phy
       - samsung,exynos850-usbdrd-phy
       - samsung,exynos990-usbdrd-phy
+      - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
 
   clocks:
     minItems: 1
@@ -110,6 +111,15 @@ properties:
   vddh-usbdp-supply:
     description: VDDh power supply for the USB DP phy.
 
+  dvdd-supply:
+    description: 0.75V power supply for the USB phy.
+
+  vdd18-supply:
+    description: 1.8V power supply for the USB phy.
+
+  vdd33-supply:
+    description: 3.3V power supply for the USB phy.
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - clocks
@@ -219,6 +229,7 @@ allOf:
               - samsung,exynos7870-usbdrd-phy
               - samsung,exynos850-usbdrd-phy
               - samsung,exynos990-usbdrd-phy
+              - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
     then:
       properties:
         clocks:
@@ -236,6 +247,24 @@ allOf:
         reg-names:
           maxItems: 1
 
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            enum:
+              - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
+    then:
+      required:
+        - dvdd-supply
+        - vdd18-supply
+        - vdd33-supply
+
+    else:
+      properties:
+        dvdd-supply: false
+        vdd18-supply: false
+        vdd33-supply: false
+
 unevaluatedProperties: false
 
 examples:
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC. The
> USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so no
> driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a dedicated
> compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>

You just dropped all tags without explaining why.

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

Hi Krzysztof,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: 04 September 2025 12:18 PM
> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
> phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
> faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
> selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> 
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> > Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC.
> > The
> > USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so
> > no driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a
> > dedicated compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> 
> You just dropped all tags without explaining why.

Regretted inconvenience. 

There were significant changes in supplies' names in driver and schemas 
(patch-set v8). This led to make changes in patch no 5.  And review for 
these changes is needed.  Hence, removed RB tag in this patch-set. 

There was a ask for the same https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/000401dc18cd$ec02a1b0$c407e510$@samsung.com/#:~:text=Let%20me%20know%2C%20because%20of%20above%20changes%2C%20should%20be%20removing%20your%20%0A%27reviewed%2Dby%27%20tag%20from%20patch%201%20and%203.

This had to be captured in changelog along with other details. Will remember to add details 
in future, if any tags are removed. 

However,  do I need to send v9 with the details? 

> 
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
> 
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions of
> patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is "received",
> when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can
> help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags.
> The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they apply.
> 
> Please read:
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=6abe7ac7-0bc392bf-6abff188-
> 74fe485fffb1-49c70cea06738e63&q=1&e=fc43c80a-8c7b-41b0-aa24-
> 8cb76d954fe5&u=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv6.12-
> rc3%2Fsource%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fsubmitting-
> patches.rst%23L577
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> </form letter>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Thank you.

Regards,
Pritam

Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/09/2025 09:51, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>> Sent: 04 September 2025 12:18 PM
>> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
>> Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
>> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
>> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
>> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
>> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
>> phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
>> soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
>> faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
>> selvarasu.g@samsung.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
>> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
>>> Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC.
>>> The
>>> USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so
>>> no driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a
>>> dedicated compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
>>
>> You just dropped all tags without explaining why.
> 
> Regretted inconvenience. 
> 
> There were significant changes in supplies' names in driver and schemas 
> (patch-set v8). This led to make changes in patch no 5.  And review for 
> these changes is needed.  Hence, removed RB tag in this patch-set. 
> 
> There was a ask for the same https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/000401dc18cd$ec02a1b0$c407e510$@samsung.com/#:~:text=Let%20me%20know%2C%20because%20of%20above%20changes%2C%20should%20be%20removing%20your%20%0A%27reviewed%2Dby%27%20tag%20from%20patch%201%20and%203.
> 


Where in the changelog you explained why you dropped the tags?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

Hi Krzysztof,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: 04 September 2025 03:12 PM
> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
> phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
> faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
> selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> 
> On 04/09/2025 09:51, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> >> Sent: 04 September 2025 12:18 PM
> >> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> >> Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> >> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> >> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org;
> >> kauschluss@disroot.org; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com;
> >> igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> >> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
> >> phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> >> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> >> linux-samsung- soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> >> dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> >> muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy:
> >> add
> >> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> >>> Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC.
> >>> The
> >>> USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so
> >>> no driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a
> >>> dedicated compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> You just dropped all tags without explaining why.
> >
> > Regretted inconvenience.
> >
> > There were significant changes in supplies' names in driver and
> > schemas (patch-set v8). This led to make changes in patch no 5.  And
> > review for these changes is needed.  Hence, removed RB tag in this patch-set.
> >
> > There was a ask for the same https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
> phy/000401dc18cd$ec02a1b0$c407e510$@samsung.com/#:~:text=Let%20me%
> 20know%2C%20because%20of%20above%20changes%2C%20should%20be%20
> removing%20your%20%0A%27reviewed%2Dby%27%20tag%20from%20patch%
> 201%20and%203.
> >
> 
> 
> Where in the changelog you explained why you dropped the tags?

Along with supplies' names, there were similar commit messages 
for patch no 1, 3 as patch no 5 (v7). (though, they were explaining 
schema more than h/w). Changed commit messages of the 
patch no 1, 3, 5 (v7) as per reference commits and would like 
to get them reviewed again, so did not add RB for patch 1 and 3,
which you had given RB (in v7). 

Forgot to add these details for dropping the RB tags in changelog. 
Do I need to send v9 by retaining RB for patch 1 and 3?

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


Thank you.

Regards,
Pritam

Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/09/2025 19:21, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>> Sent: 04 September 2025 03:12 PM
>> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
>> Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
>> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
>> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
>> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
>> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
>> phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
>> soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
>> faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
>> selvarasu.g@samsung.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
>> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
>>
>> On 04/09/2025 09:51, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>>>> Sent: 04 September 2025 12:18 PM
>>>> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
>>>> Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
>>>> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
>>>> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org;
>>>> kauschluss@disroot.org; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com;
>>>> igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
>>>> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
>>>> phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>>>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
>>>> linux-samsung- soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
>>>> dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
>>>> muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy:
>>>> add
>>>> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
>>>>> Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC.
>>>>> The
>>>>> USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so
>>>>> no driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a
>>>>> dedicated compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
>>>>
>>>> You just dropped all tags without explaining why.
>>>
>>> Regretted inconvenience.
>>>
>>> There were significant changes in supplies' names in driver and
>>> schemas (patch-set v8). This led to make changes in patch no 5.  And
>>> review for these changes is needed.  Hence, removed RB tag in this patch-set.
>>>
>>> There was a ask for the same https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
>> phy/000401dc18cd$ec02a1b0$c407e510$@samsung.com/#:~:text=Let%20me%
>> 20know%2C%20because%20of%20above%20changes%2C%20should%20be%20
>> removing%20your%20%0A%27reviewed%2Dby%27%20tag%20from%20patch%
>> 201%20and%203.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Where in the changelog you explained why you dropped the tags?
> 
> Along with supplies' names, there were similar commit messages 
> for patch no 1, 3 as patch no 5 (v7). (though, they were explaining 
> schema more than h/w). Changed commit messages of the 
> patch no 1, 3, 5 (v7) as per reference commits and would like 
> to get them reviewed again, so did not add RB for patch 1 and 3,
> which you had given RB (in v7). 

I do not have time to review the same second time and I find such
request quite a waste of my time. It's v8 so I am surprised to see it
getting changed even after review.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

Hi Krzysztof,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: 18 September 2025 08:13 AM
> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
> phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
> faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
> selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> 
> On 04/09/2025 19:21, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> >> Sent: 04 September 2025 03:12 PM
> >> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> >> Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> >> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> >> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org;
> >> kauschluss@disroot.org; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com;
> >> igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> >> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
> >> phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> >> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> >> linux-samsung- soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> >> dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> >> muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy:
> >> add
> >> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> >>
> >> On 04/09/2025 09:51, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> >>> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> >>>> Sent: 04 September 2025 12:18 PM
> >>>> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> >>>> Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> >>>> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> >>>> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org;
> >>>> kauschluss@disroot.org; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com;
> >>>> igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> >>>> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
> >>>> phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> >>>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> >>>> linux-samsung- soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> >>>> dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> >>>> muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy:
> >>>> add
> >>>> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> >>>>> Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC.
> >>>>> The
> >>>>> USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC,
> >>>>> so no driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add
> >>>>> a dedicated compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> You just dropped all tags without explaining why.
> >>>
> >>> Regretted inconvenience.
> >>>
> >>> There were significant changes in supplies' names in driver and
> >>> schemas (patch-set v8). This led to make changes in patch no 5.  And
> >>> review for these changes is needed.  Hence, removed RB tag in this patch-
> set.
> >>>
> >>> There was a ask for the same https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
> >>
> phy/000401dc18cd$ec02a1b0$c407e510$@samsung.com/#:~:text=Let%20me%
> >>
> 20know%2C%20because%20of%20above%20changes%2C%20should%20be%20
> >>
> removing%20your%20%0A%27reviewed%2Dby%27%20tag%20from%20patch%
> >> 201%20and%203.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Where in the changelog you explained why you dropped the tags?
> >
> > Along with supplies' names, there were similar commit messages for
> > patch no 1, 3 as patch no 5 (v7). (though, they were explaining schema
> > more than h/w). Changed commit messages of the patch no 1, 3, 5 (v7)
> > as per reference commits and would like to get them reviewed again, so
> > did not add RB for patch 1 and 3, which you had given RB (in v7).
> 
> I do not have time to review the same second time and I find such request quite
> a waste of my time. It's v8 so I am surprised to see it getting changed even after
> review.	
> 

OK, those were only commit message changes, so I am going to retain your 
RB tags for patch 1 and 3. Sorry about noise.

However, do you want me to send v9 by retaining RB tags in respective patches?

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Thank you,

Regards,
Pritam

RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

Hi Krzysztof,


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> Sent: 04 September 2025 03:52 PM
> To: 'Krzysztof Kozlowski' <krzk@kernel.org>
> Cc: 'vkoul@kernel.org' <vkoul@kernel.org>; 'kishon@kernel.org'
> <kishon@kernel.org>; 'robh@kernel.org' <robh@kernel.org>;
> 'krzk+dt@kernel.org' <krzk+dt@kernel.org>; 'conor+dt@kernel.org'
> <conor+dt@kernel.org>; 'alim.akhtar@samsung.com'
> <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; 'andre.draszik@linaro.org'
> <andre.draszik@linaro.org>; 'peter.griffin@linaro.org'
> <peter.griffin@linaro.org>; 'kauschluss@disroot.org' <kauschluss@disroot.org>;
> 'ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com' <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com>;
> 'igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org'
> <igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org>; 'm.szyprowski@samsung.com'
> <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>; 's.nawrocki@samsung.com'
> <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; 'linux-phy@lists.infradead.org' <linux-
> phy@lists.infradead.org>; 'devicetree@vger.kernel.org'
> <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org' <linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org>; 'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org' <linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org>; 'linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org' <linux-
> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>; 'rosa.pila@samsung.com'
> <rosa.pila@samsung.com>; 'dev.tailor@samsung.com'
> <dev.tailor@samsung.com>; 'faraz.ata@samsung.com'
> <faraz.ata@samsung.com>; 'muhammed.ali@samsung.com'
> <muhammed.ali@samsung.com>; 'selvarasu.g@samsung.com'
> <selvarasu.g@samsung.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> > Sent: 04 September 2025 03:12 PM
> > To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> > Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> > krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> > andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org;
> > kauschluss@disroot.org; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com;
> > igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> > m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
> > phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > linux-samsung- soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> > dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> > muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy:
> > add
> > ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> >
> > On 04/09/2025 09:51, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> > > Hi Krzysztof,
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> > >> Sent: 04 September 2025 12:18 PM
> > >> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> > >> Cc: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> > >> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> > >> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org;
> > >> kauschluss@disroot.org; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com;
> > >> igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> > >> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com; linux-
> > >> phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > >> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > >> linux-samsung- soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> > >> dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> > >> muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy:
> > >> add
> > >> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> > >>> Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC.
> > >>> The
> > >>> USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC,
> > >>> so no driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add
> > >>> a dedicated compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> > >>
> > >> You just dropped all tags without explaining why.
> > >
> > > Regretted inconvenience.
> > >
> > > There were significant changes in supplies' names in driver and
> > > schemas (patch-set v8). This led to make changes in patch no 5.  And
> > > review for these changes is needed.  Hence, removed RB tag in this patch-
> set.
> > >
> > > There was a ask for the same https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
> >
> phy/000401dc18cd$ec02a1b0$c407e510$@samsung.com/#:~:text=Let%20me%
> >
> 20know%2C%20because%20of%20above%20changes%2C%20should%20be%20
> >
> removing%20your%20%0A%27reviewed%2Dby%27%20tag%20from%20patch%
> > 201%20and%203.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Where in the changelog you explained why you dropped the tags?
> 
> Along with supplies' names, there were similar commit messages for patch no 1,
> 3 as patch no 5 (v7). (though, they were explaining schema more than h/w).
> Changed commit messages of the patch no 1, 3, 5 (v7) as per reference commits
> and would like to get them reviewed again, so did not add RB for patch 1 and 3,
> which you had given RB (in v7).
> 
> Forgot to add these details for dropping the RB tags in changelog.
> Do I need to send v9 by retaining RB for patch 1 and 3?
> 

Gentle Reminder. 

> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> 
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Regards,
> Pritam

Thank you,

Regards,
Pritam

Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 03/09/2025 16:38, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
> index e906403208c0..8d8114eb5660 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ properties:
>        - samsung,exynos7870-usbdrd-phy
>        - samsung,exynos850-usbdrd-phy
>        - samsung,exynos990-usbdrd-phy
> +      - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
>  
>    clocks:
>      minItems: 1
> @@ -110,6 +111,15 @@ properties:
>    vddh-usbdp-supply:
>      description: VDDh power supply for the USB DP phy.
>  
> +  dvdd-supply:
> +    description: 0.75V power supply for the USB phy.

So this is existing dvdd-usb20-supply.

Same for all of the rest.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

Hi Krzysztof,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: 18 September 2025 08:15 AM
> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>; vkoul@kernel.org;
> kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org;
> conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com; andre.draszik@linaro.org;
> peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com
> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
> faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
> selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> 
> On 03/09/2025 16:38, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-
> phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-
> phy.yaml
> > index e906403208c0..8d8114eb5660 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ properties:
> >        - samsung,exynos7870-usbdrd-phy
> >        - samsung,exynos850-usbdrd-phy
> >        - samsung,exynos990-usbdrd-phy
> > +      - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
> >
> >    clocks:
> >      minItems: 1
> > @@ -110,6 +111,15 @@ properties:
> >    vddh-usbdp-supply:
> >      description: VDDh power supply for the USB DP phy.
> >
> > +  dvdd-supply:
> > +    description: 0.75V power supply for the USB phy.
> 
> So this is existing dvdd-usb20-supply.
> 
> Same for all of the rest.
> 

Yes, we have already discussed this and convergence was to use the 
conventions which are mentioned in the Data-book. So, I updated the 
supply names accordingly. 

Please see the below communications for the same. 

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/83dc9435-5850-425d-b345-52e84ef9262c@kernel.org/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/6e1c67d2-9bfa-442a-9d53-8c5970a2a9ef@kernel.org/

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Thank you,

Regards,
Pritam

Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 18/09/2025 20:55, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> 
> Yes, we have already discussed this and convergence was to use the 
> conventions which are mentioned in the Data-book. So, I updated the 
> supply names accordingly. 
> 
> Please see the below communications for the same. 
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/83dc9435-5850-425d-b345-52e84ef9262c@kernel.org/
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/6e1c67d2-9bfa-442a-9d53-8c5970a2a9ef@kernel.org/
Ah, ok, although next time I might ask the same, since commit msg does
not explain that.

I still cannot find constraints for the rest of properties, though.
Best regards,
Krzysztof

RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

Hi Krzysztof,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: 19 September 2025 05:59 AM
> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>; vkoul@kernel.org;
> kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org;
> conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com; andre.draszik@linaro.org;
> peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com
> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
> faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
> selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> 
> On 18/09/2025 20:55, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> >
> > Yes, we have already discussed this and convergence was to use the
> > conventions which are mentioned in the Data-book. So, I updated the
> > supply names accordingly.
> >
> > Please see the below communications for the same.
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/83dc9435-5850-425d-b345-52e84ef9262c
> > @kernel.org/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/6e1c67d2-9bfa-442a-9d53-8c5970a2a9ef
> > @kernel.org/
> Ah, ok, although next time I might ask the same, since commit msg does not
> explain that.

Ok, will update commit message. 
Please confirm the commit message if I updated it as below.  

"dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC. The
USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so no
driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a dedicated
compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.

This phy needs 0.75v, 0.18v and 3.3v supplies for its internal 
functionally. Power Supply's names are as per phy's User Data-Book.
These names, (dvdd, vdd18 and vdd33), are considered  for 0.75v, 1.8v 
and 3.3v respectively.  
"

> 
> I still cannot find constraints for the rest of properties, though.

Sorry I didn't get it completely. Can you please elaborate on the same? 

Let me know if you want me to update the commit message 
and send v9? And retain your RB on patch1 and patch3?

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Thank you.

Regards,
Pritam

Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 22/09/2025 14:26, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> This phy needs 0.75v, 0.18v and 3.3v supplies for its internal 
> functionally. Power Supply's names are as per phy's User Data-Book.
> These names, (dvdd, vdd18 and vdd33), are considered  for 0.75v, 1.8v 
> and 3.3v respectively.  
> "
> 
>>
>> I still cannot find constraints for the rest of properties, though.
> 
> Sorry I didn't get it completely. Can you please elaborate on the same? 


Writing bindings and introductory talks elaborate on that. You add
properties without constraints. That's not what we want. We want
constraints.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

Hi Krzysztof,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: 07 October 2025 11:54 AM
> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>; vkoul@kernel.org;
> kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org;
> conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com; andre.draszik@linaro.org;
> peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com
> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
> faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
> selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> 
> On 22/09/2025 14:26, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> > This phy needs 0.75v, 0.18v and 3.3v supplies for its internal
> > functionally. Power Supply's names are as per phy's User Data-Book.
> > These names, (dvdd, vdd18 and vdd33), are considered  for 0.75v, 1.8v
> > and 3.3v respectively.
> > "
> >
> >>
> >> I still cannot find constraints for the rest of properties, though.
> >
> > Sorry I didn't get it completely. Can you please elaborate on the same?
> 
> 
> Writing bindings and introductory talks elaborate on that. You add properties
> without constraints. That's not what we want. We want constraints.
> 

Have added only supplies in this patch-set. However, was going 
through schema example and it says nothing is needed to define
in terms of supply. 

ref: 
1. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst +151

... A "description" property is always required.

2. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/example-schema.yaml +135

# *-supply is always a single phandle, so nothing more to define.
foo-supply: true

Please confirm and let me know if your expectations are something 
else in terms of constraints of the properties.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Thank you,

Regards,
Pritam

Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 08/10/2025 13:45, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>> Sent: 07 October 2025 11:54 AM
>> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>; vkoul@kernel.org;
>> kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org;
>> conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com; andre.draszik@linaro.org;
>> peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
>> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
>> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com
>> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
>> soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
>> faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
>> selvarasu.g@samsung.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
>> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
>>
>> On 22/09/2025 14:26, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
>>> This phy needs 0.75v, 0.18v and 3.3v supplies for its internal
>>> functionally. Power Supply's names are as per phy's User Data-Book.
>>> These names, (dvdd, vdd18 and vdd33), are considered  for 0.75v, 1.8v
>>> and 3.3v respectively.
>>> "
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I still cannot find constraints for the rest of properties, though.
>>>
>>> Sorry I didn't get it completely. Can you please elaborate on the same?
>>
>>
>> Writing bindings and introductory talks elaborate on that. You add properties
>> without constraints. That's not what we want. We want constraints.
>>
> 
> Have added only supplies in this patch-set. However, was going 
> through schema example and it says nothing is needed to define
> in terms of supply. 


I don't have original patchset in my inbox anymore, so not sure what was
there, but most likely you miss constraining the presence of these
properties per each variant. IOW, not each of devices in the bindings
have these supplies, so I expect syntax similar as in example-schema.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/example-schema.yaml#L212


Best regards,
Krzysztof

RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

Hi Krzysztof,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: 08 October 2025 01:42 PM
> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>; vkoul@kernel.org;
> kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org;
> conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com; andre.draszik@linaro.org;
> peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com
> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
> faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
> selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> 
> On 08/10/2025 13:45, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> >> Sent: 07 October 2025 11:54 AM
> >> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>;
> >> vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> >> krzk+dt@kernel.org;
> >> conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> >> conor+andre.draszik@linaro.org;
> >> peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> >> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> >> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com
> >> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> >> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> >> linux-samsung- soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> >> dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> >> muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy:
> >> add
> >> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> >>
> >> On 22/09/2025 14:26, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> >>> This phy needs 0.75v, 0.18v and 3.3v supplies for its internal
> >>> functionally. Power Supply's names are as per phy's User Data-Book.
> >>> These names, (dvdd, vdd18 and vdd33), are considered  for 0.75v,
> >>> 1.8v and 3.3v respectively.
> >>> "
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I still cannot find constraints for the rest of properties, though.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry I didn't get it completely. Can you please elaborate on the same?
> >>
> >>
> >> Writing bindings and introductory talks elaborate on that. You add
> >> properties without constraints. That's not what we want. We want
> constraints.
> >>
> >
> > Have added only supplies in this patch-set. However, was going through
> > schema example and it says nothing is needed to define in terms of
> > supply.
> 
> 
> I don't have original patchset in my inbox anymore, so not sure what was there,
> but most likely you miss constraining the presence of these properties per each
> variant. IOW, not each of devices in the bindings have these supplies, so I expect
> syntax similar as in example-schema.
> 
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=b15f03dc-eee70b7e-b15e8893-
> 000babff88b5-a120365cc01c0261&q=1&e=61c09dc1-e3de-4b16-b34f-
> edc1fae43bb8&u=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv5.19%2Fsour
> ce%2FDocumentation%2Fdevicetree%2Fbindings%2Fexample-
> schema.yaml%23L212
> 

Yes, this was already considered based on Rob's comment and
snippet is as below. 

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20250806234217.GA2030512-robh@kernel.org/

+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            enum:
+              - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
+    then:
+      required:
+        - dvdd-supply
+        - vdd18-supply
+        - vdd33-supply
+
+    else:
+      properties:
+        dvdd-supply: false
+        vdd18-supply: false
+        vdd33-supply: false

I understand that you have lost the context, my bad. 
Let me share v9 with all RB tags added in v7 and v8 and 
let us have all consolidated review one more time (sorry for this).

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


Thank you,

Regards,
Pritam

RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Alim Akhtar]

Hi Pritam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 1:08 PM
> To: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com;
> pritam.sutar@samsung.com
> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> 
> Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC.
> The
> USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so no driver
> changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a dedicated
> compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>

RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> Sent: 29 September 2025 12:16 PM
> To: 'Pritam Manohar Sutar' <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>; vkoul@kernel.org;
> kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org;
> conor+dt@kernel.org; andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org;
> kauschluss@disroot.org; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com;
> igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org; m.szyprowski@samsung.com;
> s.nawrocki@samsung.com
> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com; dev.tailor@samsung.com;
> faraz.ata@samsung.com; muhammed.ali@samsung.com;
> selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> 
> Hi Pritam
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 1:08 PM
> > To: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> > krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> > andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org;
> > kauschluss@disroot.org; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com;
> > igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> > m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com;
> > pritam.sutar@samsung.com
> > Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> > samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> > dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> > muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> > Subject: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> > ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> >
> > Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC.
> > The
> > USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so
> > no driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a
> > dedicated compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> > ---
> Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>

Hi Alim,
Thank you for RB tag.

Hi Vinod, 
Addressed comments on phy drivers those were given in patch-set v5. 
Can you please check and let me know if any other comments? 

Hi Krzysztof, 
Please let me know if you want me send v9 by retaining  your RB on 
patch1 and patch3? Also do let me know if any other concerns need 
to be addressed?

Regards,
Pritam

[PATCH v8 2/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support HS phy for ExynosAutov920

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

Enable UTMI+ phy support for this SoC which is very similar to what
the existing Exynos850 supports.

Add required change in phy driver to support HS phy for this SoC.

Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c    | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h |   2 +
 2 files changed, 125 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
index a88ba95bdc8f..dfc2cc71e579 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
@@ -2054,6 +2054,126 @@ static const struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy_drvdata exynos990_usbdrd_phy = {
 	.n_regulators		= ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_regulator_names),
 };
 
+static int exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
+{
+	struct phy_usb_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd = to_usbdrd_phy(inst);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(phy_drd->drv_data->n_clks, phy_drd->clks);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Bypass PHY isol */
+	inst->phy_cfg->phy_isol(inst, false);
+
+	/* UTMI or PIPE3 specific init */
+	inst->phy_cfg->phy_init(phy_drd);
+
+	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(phy_drd->drv_data->n_clks, phy_drd->clks);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
+{
+	struct phy_usb_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd = to_usbdrd_phy(inst);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(phy_drd->drv_data->n_clks, phy_drd->clks);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	exynos850_usbdrd_phy_exit(phy);
+
+	/* enable PHY isol */
+	inst->phy_cfg->phy_isol(inst, true);
+
+	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(phy_drd->drv_data->n_clks, phy_drd->clks);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
+{
+	struct phy_usb_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd = to_usbdrd_phy(inst);
+	int ret;
+
+	dev_dbg(phy_drd->dev, "Request to power_on usbdrd_phy phy\n");
+
+	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(phy_drd->drv_data->n_core_clks,
+				      phy_drd->core_clks);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Enable supply */
+	ret = regulator_bulk_enable(phy_drd->drv_data->n_regulators,
+				    phy_drd->regulators);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(phy_drd->dev, "Failed to enable PHY regulator(s)\n");
+		goto fail_supply;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+fail_supply:
+	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(phy_drd->drv_data->n_core_clks,
+				   phy_drd->core_clks);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
+{
+	struct phy_usb_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd = to_usbdrd_phy(inst);
+
+	dev_dbg(phy_drd->dev, "Request to power_off usbdrd_phy phy\n");
+
+	/* Disable supply */
+	regulator_bulk_disable(phy_drd->drv_data->n_regulators,
+			       phy_drd->regulators);
+
+	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(phy_drd->drv_data->n_core_clks,
+				   phy_drd->core_clks);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const char * const exynosautov920_usb20_regulators[] = {
+	"dvdd", "vdd18", "vdd33",
+};
+
+static const struct phy_ops exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_ops = {
+	.init		= exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_init,
+	.exit		= exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_exit,
+	.power_on       = exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_power_on,
+	.power_off      = exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_power_off,
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static const struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy_config phy_cfg_exynosautov920[] = {
+	{
+		.id		= EXYNOS5_DRDPHY_UTMI,
+		.phy_isol	= exynos5_usbdrd_phy_isol,
+		.phy_init	= exynos850_usbdrd_utmi_init,
+	},
+};
+
+static const struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy_drvdata exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy = {
+	.phy_cfg		= phy_cfg_exynosautov920,
+	.phy_ops		= &exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_ops,
+	.pmu_offset_usbdrd0_phy	= EXYNOSAUTOV920_PHY_CTRL_USB20,
+	.clk_names		= exynos5_clk_names,
+	.n_clks			= ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_clk_names),
+	.core_clk_names		= exynos5_core_clk_names,
+	.n_core_clks		= ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_core_clk_names),
+	.regulator_names	= exynosautov920_usb20_regulators,
+	.n_regulators		= ARRAY_SIZE(exynosautov920_usb20_regulators),
+};
+
 static const struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy_config phy_cfg_gs101[] = {
 	{
 		.id		= EXYNOS5_DRDPHY_UTMI,
@@ -2260,6 +2380,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos5_usbdrd_phy_of_match[] = {
 	}, {
 		.compatible = "samsung,exynos990-usbdrd-phy",
 		.data = &exynos990_usbdrd_phy
+	}, {
+		.compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy",
+		.data = &exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy
 	},
 	{ },
 };
diff --git a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
index 71e0c09a49eb..4923f9be3d1f 100644
--- a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
@@ -688,4 +688,6 @@
 #define GS101_GRP2_INTR_BID_UPEND				(0x0208)
 #define GS101_GRP2_INTR_BID_CLEAR				(0x020c)
 
+/* exynosautov920 */
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_PHY_CTRL_USB20				(0x0710)
 #endif /* __LINUX_SOC_EXYNOS_REGS_PMU_H */
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [PATCH v8 2/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support HS phy for ExynosAutov920

[Alim Akhtar]

Hi Pritam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 1:08 PM
> To: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com;
> pritam.sutar@samsung.com
> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: [PATCH v8 2/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support HS phy for
> ExynosAutov920
> 
> Enable UTMI+ phy support for this SoC which is very similar to what the
> existing Exynos850 supports.
> 
> Add required change in phy driver to support HS phy for this SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>

[PATCH v8 3/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 combo hsphy

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

The USBDRD31 5nm controller consists of Synopsys USB2.0 femptophy and
USBSS combophy. Add-on USB20 femptophy is required to support USB20 data
rates along with USBSS phy. Document support for the USB2.0 femptophy
found on combophy of the this SoC.

Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml          | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
index 8d8114eb5660..4a8bcf63cd91 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ properties:
       - samsung,exynos7870-usbdrd-phy
       - samsung,exynos850-usbdrd-phy
       - samsung,exynos990-usbdrd-phy
+      - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-combo-hsphy
       - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
 
   clocks:
@@ -229,6 +230,7 @@ allOf:
               - samsung,exynos7870-usbdrd-phy
               - samsung,exynos850-usbdrd-phy
               - samsung,exynos990-usbdrd-phy
+              - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-combo-hsphy
               - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
     then:
       properties:
@@ -252,6 +254,7 @@ allOf:
         compatible:
           contains:
             enum:
+              - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-combo-hsphy
               - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
     then:
       required:
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [PATCH v8 3/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 combo hsphy

[Alim Akhtar]

Hi Pritam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 1:08 PM
> To: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com;
> pritam.sutar@samsung.com
> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: [PATCH v8 3/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 combo hsphy
> 
> The USBDRD31 5nm controller consists of Synopsys USB2.0 femptophy and
> USBSS combophy. Add-on USB20 femptophy is required to support USB20
> data rates along with USBSS phy. Document support for the USB2.0
> femptophy found on combophy of the this SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>

[PATCH v8 4/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support HS combo phy for ExynosAutov920

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

Support UTMI+ combo phy for this SoC which is somewhat simmilar to
what the existing Exynos850 support does. The difference is that
some register offsets and bit fields are defferent from Exynos850.

Add required change in phy driver to support combo HS phy for this SoC.

Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 211 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 211 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
index dfc2cc71e579..c52b0e25a423 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
@@ -41,6 +41,13 @@
 #define EXYNOS2200_CLKRST_LINK_PCLK_SEL		BIT(1)
 
 #define EXYNOS2200_DRD_UTMI			0x10
+
+/* ExynosAutov920 bits */
+#define UTMICTL_FORCE_UTMI_SUSPEND		BIT(13)
+#define UTMICTL_FORCE_UTMI_SLEEP		BIT(12)
+#define UTMICTL_FORCE_DPPULLDOWN		BIT(9)
+#define UTMICTL_FORCE_DMPULLDOWN		BIT(8)
+
 #define EXYNOS2200_UTMI_FORCE_VBUSVALID		BIT(1)
 #define EXYNOS2200_UTMI_FORCE_BVALID		BIT(0)
 
@@ -250,6 +257,22 @@
 #define EXYNOS850_DRD_HSP_TEST			0x5c
 #define HSP_TEST_SIDDQ				BIT(24)
 
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSP_CLKRST		0x100
+#define HSPCLKRST_PHY20_SW_PORTRESET		BIT(3)
+#define HSPCLKRST_PHY20_SW_POR			BIT(1)
+#define HSPCLKRST_PHY20_SW_POR_SEL		BIT(0)
+
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSPCTL		0x104
+#define HSPCTRL_VBUSVLDEXTSEL			BIT(13)
+#define HSPCTRL_VBUSVLDEXT			BIT(12)
+#define HSPCTRL_EN_UTMISUSPEND			BIT(9)
+#define HSPCTRL_COMMONONN			BIT(8)
+
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSP_TEST		0x10c
+
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSPPLLTUNE		0x110
+#define HSPPLLTUNE_FSEL				GENMASK(18, 16)
+
 /* Exynos9 - GS101 */
 #define EXYNOS850_DRD_SECPMACTL			0x48
 #define SECPMACTL_PMA_ROPLL_REF_CLK_SEL		GENMASK(13, 12)
@@ -2054,6 +2077,140 @@ static const struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy_drvdata exynos990_usbdrd_phy = {
 	.n_regulators		= ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_regulator_names),
 };
 
+static void
+exynosautov920_usbdrd_utmi_init(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd)
+{
+	void __iomem *reg_phy = phy_drd->reg_phy;
+	u32 reg;
+
+	/*
+	 * Disable HWACG (hardware auto clock gating control). This
+	 * forces QACTIVE signal in Q-Channel interface to HIGH level,
+	 * to make sure the PHY clock is not gated by the hardware.
+	 */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOS850_DRD_LINKCTRL);
+	reg |= LINKCTRL_FORCE_QACT;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOS850_DRD_LINKCTRL);
+
+	/* De-assert link reset */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_CLKRST);
+	reg &= ~CLKRST_LINK_SW_RST;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_CLKRST);
+
+	/* Set PHY POR High */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSP_CLKRST);
+	reg |= HSPCLKRST_PHY20_SW_POR | HSPCLKRST_PHY20_SW_POR_SEL;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSP_CLKRST);
+
+	/* Enable UTMI+ */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_UTMI);
+	reg &= ~(UTMICTL_FORCE_UTMI_SUSPEND | UTMICTL_FORCE_UTMI_SLEEP |
+		UTMICTL_FORCE_DPPULLDOWN | UTMICTL_FORCE_DMPULLDOWN);
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_UTMI);
+
+	/* set phy clock & control HS phy */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSPCTL);
+	reg |= HSPCTRL_EN_UTMISUSPEND | HSPCTRL_COMMONONN;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSPCTL);
+
+	fsleep(100);
+
+	/* Set VBUS Valid and DP-Pull up control by VBUS pad usage */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOS850_DRD_LINKCTRL);
+	reg |= FIELD_PREP_CONST(LINKCTRL_BUS_FILTER_BYPASS, 0xf);
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOS850_DRD_LINKCTRL);
+
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_UTMI);
+	reg |= EXYNOS2200_UTMI_FORCE_VBUSVALID | EXYNOS2200_UTMI_FORCE_BVALID;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_UTMI);
+
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSPCTL);
+	reg |= HSPCTRL_VBUSVLDEXTSEL | HSPCTRL_VBUSVLDEXT;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSPCTL);
+
+	/* Setting FSEL for refference clock */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSPPLLTUNE);
+	reg &= ~HSPPLLTUNE_FSEL;
+
+	switch (phy_drd->extrefclk) {
+	case EXYNOS5_FSEL_50MHZ:
+		reg |= FIELD_PREP(HSPPLLTUNE_FSEL, 7);
+		break;
+	case EXYNOS5_FSEL_26MHZ:
+		reg |= FIELD_PREP(HSPPLLTUNE_FSEL, 6);
+		break;
+	case EXYNOS5_FSEL_24MHZ:
+		reg |= FIELD_PREP(HSPPLLTUNE_FSEL, 2);
+		break;
+	case EXYNOS5_FSEL_20MHZ:
+		reg |= FIELD_PREP(HSPPLLTUNE_FSEL, 1);
+		break;
+	case EXYNOS5_FSEL_19MHZ2:
+		reg |= FIELD_PREP(HSPPLLTUNE_FSEL, 0);
+		break;
+	default:
+		dev_warn(phy_drd->dev, "unsupported ref clk: %#.2x\n",
+			 phy_drd->extrefclk);
+		break;
+	}
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSPPLLTUNE);
+
+	/* Enable PHY Power Mode */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSP_TEST);
+	reg &= ~HSP_TEST_SIDDQ;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSP_TEST);
+
+	/* before POR low, 10us delay is needed to Finish PHY reset */
+	fsleep(10);
+
+	/* Set PHY POR Low */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSP_CLKRST);
+	reg |= HSPCLKRST_PHY20_SW_POR_SEL;
+	reg &= ~(HSPCLKRST_PHY20_SW_POR | HSPCLKRST_PHY20_SW_PORTRESET);
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSP_CLKRST);
+
+	/* after POR low and delay 75us, PHYCLOCK is guaranteed. */
+	fsleep(75);
+
+	/* force pipe3 signal for link */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOS850_DRD_LINKCTRL);
+	reg |= LINKCTRL_FORCE_PIPE_EN;
+	reg &= ~LINKCTRL_FORCE_PHYSTATUS;
+	reg |= LINKCTRL_FORCE_RXELECIDLE;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOS850_DRD_LINKCTRL);
+}
+
+static void
+exynosautov920_usbdrd_hsphy_disable(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd)
+{
+	u32 reg;
+	void __iomem *reg_phy = phy_drd->reg_phy;
+
+	/* set phy clock & control HS phy */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_UTMI);
+	reg |= UTMICTL_FORCE_UTMI_SUSPEND | UTMICTL_FORCE_UTMI_SLEEP;
+	reg &= ~(UTMICTL_FORCE_DPPULLDOWN | UTMICTL_FORCE_DMPULLDOWN);
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_UTMI);
+
+	/* Disable PHY Power Mode */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSP_TEST);
+	reg |= HSP_TEST_SIDDQ;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSP_TEST);
+
+	/* clear force q-channel */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOS850_DRD_LINKCTRL);
+	reg &= ~LINKCTRL_FORCE_QACT;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOS850_DRD_LINKCTRL);
+
+	/* link sw reset is need for USB_DP/DM high-z in host mode */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_CLKRST);
+	reg |= CLKRST_LINK_SW_RST;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_CLKRST);
+	fsleep(10);
+	reg &= ~CLKRST_LINK_SW_RST;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_CLKRST);
+}
+
 static int exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
 {
 	struct phy_usb_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
@@ -2095,6 +2252,27 @@ static int exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int exynosautov920_usbdrd_combo_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
+{
+	struct phy_usb_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd = to_usbdrd_phy(inst);
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(phy_drd->drv_data->n_clks, phy_drd->clks);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (inst->phy_cfg->id == EXYNOS5_DRDPHY_UTMI)
+		exynosautov920_usbdrd_hsphy_disable(phy_drd);
+
+	/* enable PHY isol */
+	inst->phy_cfg->phy_isol(inst, true);
+
+	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(phy_drd->drv_data->n_clks, phy_drd->clks);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
 {
 	struct phy_usb_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
@@ -2146,6 +2324,36 @@ static const char * const exynosautov920_usb20_regulators[] = {
 	"dvdd", "vdd18", "vdd33",
 };
 
+static const struct phy_ops exynosautov920_usbdrd_combo_hsphy_ops = {
+	.init		= exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_init,
+	.exit		= exynosautov920_usbdrd_combo_phy_exit,
+	.power_on	= exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_power_on,
+	.power_off	= exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_power_off,
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static const struct
+exynos5_usbdrd_phy_config usbdrd_hsphy_cfg_exynosautov920[] = {
+	{
+		.id		= EXYNOS5_DRDPHY_UTMI,
+		.phy_isol	= exynos5_usbdrd_phy_isol,
+		.phy_init	= exynosautov920_usbdrd_utmi_init,
+	},
+};
+
+static const
+struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy_drvdata exynosautov920_usbdrd_combo_hsphy = {
+	.phy_cfg		= usbdrd_hsphy_cfg_exynosautov920,
+	.phy_ops		= &exynosautov920_usbdrd_combo_hsphy_ops,
+	.pmu_offset_usbdrd0_phy	= EXYNOSAUTOV920_PHY_CTRL_USB20,
+	.clk_names		= exynos5_clk_names,
+	.n_clks			= ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_clk_names),
+	.core_clk_names		= exynos5_core_clk_names,
+	.n_core_clks		= ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_core_clk_names),
+	.regulator_names	= exynosautov920_usb20_regulators,
+	.n_regulators		= ARRAY_SIZE(exynosautov920_usb20_regulators),
+};
+
 static const struct phy_ops exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_ops = {
 	.init		= exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_init,
 	.exit		= exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_exit,
@@ -2380,6 +2588,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos5_usbdrd_phy_of_match[] = {
 	}, {
 		.compatible = "samsung,exynos990-usbdrd-phy",
 		.data = &exynos990_usbdrd_phy
+	}, {
+		.compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-combo-hsphy",
+		.data = &exynosautov920_usbdrd_combo_hsphy
 	}, {
 		.compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy",
 		.data = &exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [PATCH v8 4/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support HS combo phy for ExynosAutov920

[Alim Akhtar]

Hi Pritam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 1:08 PM
> To: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com;
> pritam.sutar@samsung.com
> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: [PATCH v8 4/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support HS combo phy for
> ExynosAutov920
> 
> Support UTMI+ combo phy for this SoC which is somewhat simmilar to what
> the existing Exynos850 support does. The difference is that some register
> offsets and bit fields are defferent from Exynos850.
> 
> Add required change in phy driver to support combo HS phy for this SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> ---
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>

[PATCH v8 5/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 combo ssphy

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

The USBDRD31 5nm controller consists of Synopsys USB20 femptoPhy and
USB31 SSP+ combophy. Document support for the USB31 SSP+ phy found on
combophy of the ExynosAutov920 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
---
 .../bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml     | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
index 4a8bcf63cd91..72d41ccdb090 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,usb3-drd-phy.yaml
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ properties:
       - samsung,exynos7870-usbdrd-phy
       - samsung,exynos850-usbdrd-phy
       - samsung,exynos990-usbdrd-phy
+      - samsung,exynosautov920-usb31drd-combo-ssphy
       - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-combo-hsphy
       - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
 
@@ -230,6 +231,7 @@ allOf:
               - samsung,exynos7870-usbdrd-phy
               - samsung,exynos850-usbdrd-phy
               - samsung,exynos990-usbdrd-phy
+              - samsung,exynosautov920-usb31drd-combo-ssphy
               - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-combo-hsphy
               - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
     then:
@@ -254,18 +256,32 @@ allOf:
         compatible:
           contains:
             enum:
+              - samsung,exynosautov920-usb31drd-combo-ssphy
               - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-combo-hsphy
               - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
     then:
       required:
         - dvdd-supply
         - vdd18-supply
-        - vdd33-supply
 
     else:
       properties:
         dvdd-supply: false
         vdd18-supply: false
+
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            enum:
+              - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-combo-hsphy
+              - samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-phy
+    then:
+      required:
+        - vdd33-supply
+
+    else:
+      properties:
         vdd33-supply: false
 
 unevaluatedProperties: false
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [PATCH v8 5/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 combo ssphy

[Alim Akhtar]

Hi pritam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 1:08 PM
> To: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com;
> pritam.sutar@samsung.com
> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: [PATCH v8 5/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 combo ssphy
> 
> The USBDRD31 5nm controller consists of Synopsys USB20 femptoPhy and
> USB31 SSP+ combophy. Document support for the USB31 SSP+ phy found on
> combophy of the ExynosAutov920 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>

[PATCH v8 6/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support SS combo phy for ExynosAutov920

[Pritam Manohar Sutar]

Add required change in phy driver to support combo SS phy for this SoC.

Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c    | 325 +++++++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h |   1 +
 2 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
index c52b0e25a423..53a5b72ff249 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
@@ -273,6 +273,36 @@
 #define EXYNOSAUTOV920_DRD_HSPPLLTUNE		0x110
 #define HSPPLLTUNE_FSEL				GENMASK(18, 16)
 
+/* ExynosAutov920 phy usb31drd port reg */
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_RST_CTRL	0x000
+#define PHY_RST_CTRL_PIPE_LANE0_RESET_N_OVRD_EN	BIT(5)
+#define PHY_RST_CTRL_PIPE_LANE0_RESET_N		BIT(4)
+#define PHY_RST_CTRL_PHY_RESET_OVRD_EN		BIT(1)
+#define PHY_RST_CTRL_PHY_RESET			BIT(0)
+
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0	0x0004
+#define PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_ADDR		GENMASK(31, 16)
+#define PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_CLK		BIT(8)
+#define PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_ACK		BIT(4)
+#define PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_SEL		BIT(0)
+
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON1	0x0008
+
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON2	0x000c
+#define PHY_CR_PARA_CON2_PHY0_CR_PARA_WR_EN		BIT(0)
+#define PHY_CR_PARA_CON2_PHY0_CR_PARA_WR_DATA		GENMASK(31, 16)
+
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CONFIG0	0x100
+#define PHY_CONFIG0_PHY0_PMA_PWR_STABLE		BIT(14)
+#define PHY_CONFIG0_PHY0_PCS_PWR_STABLE		BIT(13)
+#define PHY_CONFIG0_PHY0_ANA_PWR_EN		BIT(1)
+
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CONFIG7	0x11c
+#define PHY_CONFIG7_PHY_TEST_POWERDOWN		BIT(24)
+
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CONFIG4	0x110
+#define PHY_CONFIG4_PIPE_RX0_SRIS_MODE_EN	BIT(2)
+
 /* Exynos9 - GS101 */
 #define EXYNOS850_DRD_SECPMACTL			0x48
 #define SECPMACTL_PMA_ROPLL_REF_CLK_SEL		GENMASK(13, 12)
@@ -2077,6 +2107,251 @@ static const struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy_drvdata exynos990_usbdrd_phy = {
 	.n_regulators		= ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_regulator_names),
 };
 
+static void
+exynosautov920_usb31drd_cr_clk(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd, bool high)
+{
+	void __iomem *reg_phy = phy_drd->reg_phy;
+	u32 reg;
+
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0);
+	if (high)
+		reg |= PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_CLK;
+	else
+		reg &= ~PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_CLK;
+
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0);
+	fsleep(1);
+}
+
+static void
+exynosautov920_usb31drd_port_phy_ready(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd)
+{
+	struct device *dev = phy_drd->dev;
+	void __iomem *reg_phy = phy_drd->reg_phy;
+	static const unsigned int timeout_us = 20000;
+	static const unsigned int sleep_us = 40;
+	u32 reg;
+	int err;
+
+	/* Clear cr_para_con */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0);
+	reg &= ~(PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_CLK |
+			PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_ADDR);
+	reg |= PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_SEL;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0);
+	writel(0x0, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON1);
+	writel(0x0, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON2);
+
+	exynosautov920_usb31drd_cr_clk(phy_drd, true);
+	exynosautov920_usb31drd_cr_clk(phy_drd, false);
+
+	/*
+	 * The maximum time from phy reset de-assertion to de-assertion of
+	 * tx/rx_ack can be as high as 5ms in fast simulation mode.
+	 * Time to phy ready is < 20ms
+	 */
+	err = readl_poll_timeout(reg_phy +
+				EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0,
+			reg, !(reg & PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_ACK),
+			sleep_us, timeout_us);
+	if (err)
+		dev_err(dev, "timed out waiting for rx/tx_ack: %#.8x\n", reg);
+
+	reg &= ~PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_CLK;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0);
+}
+
+static void
+exynosautov920_usb31drd_cr_write(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd,
+				 u16 addr, u16 data)
+{
+	void __iomem *reg_phy = phy_drd->reg_phy;
+	u32 cnt = 0;
+	u32 reg;
+
+	/* Pre Clocking */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0);
+	reg |= PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_SEL;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0);
+
+	/*
+	 * tx clks must be available prior to assertion of tx req.
+	 * tx pstate p2 to p0 transition directly is not permitted.
+	 * tx clk ready must be asserted synchronously on tx clk prior
+	 * to internal transmit clk alignment sequence in the phy
+	 * when entering from p2 to p1 to p0.
+	 */
+	do {
+		exynosautov920_usb31drd_cr_clk(phy_drd, true);
+		exynosautov920_usb31drd_cr_clk(phy_drd, false);
+		cnt++;
+	} while (cnt < 15);
+
+	reg &= ~PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_SEL;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0);
+
+	/*
+	 * tx data path is active when tx lane is in p0 state
+	 * and tx data en asserted. enable cr_para_wr_en.
+	 */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON2);
+	reg &= ~PHY_CR_PARA_CON2_PHY0_CR_PARA_WR_DATA;
+	reg |= FIELD_PREP(PHY_CR_PARA_CON2_PHY0_CR_PARA_WR_DATA, data) |
+		PHY_CR_PARA_CON2_PHY0_CR_PARA_WR_EN;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON2);
+
+	/* write addr */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0);
+	reg &= ~PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_ADDR;
+	reg |= FIELD_PREP(PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_ADDR, addr) |
+		PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_CLK |
+		PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_SEL;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0);
+
+	/* check cr_para_ack*/
+	cnt = 0;
+	do {
+		/*
+		 * data symbols are captured by phy on rising edge of the
+		 * tx_clk when tx data enabled.
+		 * completion of the write cycle is acknowledged by assertion
+		 * of the cr_para_ack.
+		 */
+		exynosautov920_usb31drd_cr_clk(phy_drd, true);
+		reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CR_PARA_CON0);
+		if ((reg & PHY_CR_PARA_CON0_PHY0_CR_PARA_ACK))
+			break;
+
+		exynosautov920_usb31drd_cr_clk(phy_drd, false);
+
+		/*
+		 * wait for minimum of 10 cr_para_clk cycles after phy reset
+		 * is negated, before accessing control regs to allow for
+		 * internal resets.
+		 */
+		cnt++;
+	} while (cnt < 10);
+
+	if (cnt < 10)
+		exynosautov920_usb31drd_cr_clk(phy_drd, false);
+}
+
+static void
+exynosautov920_usb31drd_phy_reset(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd, int val)
+{
+	void __iomem *reg_phy = phy_drd->reg_phy;
+	u32 reg;
+
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_RST_CTRL);
+	reg &= ~PHY_RST_CTRL_PHY_RESET_OVRD_EN;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_RST_CTRL);
+
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_RST_CTRL);
+	if (val)
+		reg |= PHY_RST_CTRL_PHY_RESET;
+	else
+		reg &= ~PHY_RST_CTRL_PHY_RESET;
+
+	reg |= PHY_RST_CTRL_PHY_RESET_OVRD_EN;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_RST_CTRL);
+}
+
+static void
+exynosautov920_usb31drd_lane0_reset(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd, int val)
+{
+	void __iomem *reg_phy = phy_drd->reg_phy;
+	u32 reg;
+
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_RST_CTRL);
+	reg |= PHY_RST_CTRL_PIPE_LANE0_RESET_N_OVRD_EN;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_RST_CTRL);
+
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_RST_CTRL);
+	if (val)
+		reg &= ~PHY_RST_CTRL_PIPE_LANE0_RESET_N;
+	else
+		reg |= PHY_RST_CTRL_PIPE_LANE0_RESET_N;
+
+	reg &= ~PHY_RST_CTRL_PIPE_LANE0_RESET_N_OVRD_EN;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_RST_CTRL);
+}
+
+static void
+exynosautov920_usb31drd_pipe3_init(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd)
+{
+	void __iomem *reg_phy = phy_drd->reg_phy;
+	u32 reg;
+
+	/*
+	 * Phy and Pipe Lane reset assert.
+	 * assert reset (phy_reset = 1).
+	 * The lane-ack outputs are asserted during reset (tx_ack = rx_ack = 1)
+	 */
+	exynosautov920_usb31drd_phy_reset(phy_drd, 1);
+	exynosautov920_usb31drd_lane0_reset(phy_drd, 1);
+
+	/*
+	 * ANA Power En, PCS & PMA PWR Stable Set
+	 * ramp-up power suppiles
+	 */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CONFIG0);
+	reg |= PHY_CONFIG0_PHY0_ANA_PWR_EN | PHY_CONFIG0_PHY0_PCS_PWR_STABLE |
+		PHY_CONFIG0_PHY0_PMA_PWR_STABLE;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CONFIG0);
+
+	fsleep(10);
+
+	/*
+	 * phy is not functional in test_powerdown mode, test_powerdown to be
+	 * de-asserted for normal operation
+	 */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CONFIG7);
+	reg &= ~PHY_CONFIG7_PHY_TEST_POWERDOWN;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CONFIG7);
+
+	/*
+	 * phy reset signal be asserted for minimum 10us after power
+	 * supplies are ramped-up
+	 */
+	fsleep(10);
+
+	/*
+	 * Phy and Pipe Lane reset assert de-assert
+	 */
+	exynosautov920_usb31drd_phy_reset(phy_drd, 0);
+	exynosautov920_usb31drd_lane0_reset(phy_drd, 0);
+
+	/* Pipe_rx0_sris_mode_en  = 1 */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CONFIG4);
+	reg |= PHY_CONFIG4_PIPE_RX0_SRIS_MODE_EN;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CONFIG4);
+
+	/*
+	 * wait for lane ack outputs to de-assert (tx_ack = rx_ack = 0)
+	 * Exit from the reset state is indicated by de-assertion of *_ack
+	 */
+	exynosautov920_usb31drd_port_phy_ready(phy_drd);
+
+	/* override values for level settings */
+	exynosautov920_usb31drd_cr_write(phy_drd, 0x22, 0x00F5);
+}
+
+static void
+exynosautov920_usb31drd_ssphy_disable(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd)
+{
+	void __iomem *reg_phy = phy_drd->reg_phy;
+	u32 reg;
+
+	/* 1. Assert reset (phy_reset = 1) */
+	exynosautov920_usb31drd_lane0_reset(phy_drd, 1);
+	exynosautov920_usb31drd_phy_reset(phy_drd, 1);
+
+	/* phy test power down */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CONFIG7);
+	reg |= PHY_CONFIG7_PHY_TEST_POWERDOWN;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOSAUTOV920_USB31DRD_PHY_CONFIG7);
+}
+
 static void
 exynosautov920_usbdrd_utmi_init(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd)
 {
@@ -2172,12 +2447,15 @@ exynosautov920_usbdrd_utmi_init(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd)
 	/* after POR low and delay 75us, PHYCLOCK is guaranteed. */
 	fsleep(75);
 
-	/* force pipe3 signal for link */
+	/* Disable forcing pipe interface */
 	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOS850_DRD_LINKCTRL);
-	reg |= LINKCTRL_FORCE_PIPE_EN;
-	reg &= ~LINKCTRL_FORCE_PHYSTATUS;
-	reg |= LINKCTRL_FORCE_RXELECIDLE;
+	reg &= ~LINKCTRL_FORCE_PIPE_EN;
 	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOS850_DRD_LINKCTRL);
+
+	/* Pclk to pipe_clk */
+	reg = readl(reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_CLKRST);
+	reg |= EXYNOS2200_CLKRST_LINK_PCLK_SEL;
+	writel(reg, reg_phy + EXYNOS2200_DRD_CLKRST);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -2264,6 +2542,8 @@ static int exynosautov920_usbdrd_combo_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
 
 	if (inst->phy_cfg->id == EXYNOS5_DRDPHY_UTMI)
 		exynosautov920_usbdrd_hsphy_disable(phy_drd);
+	else if (inst->phy_cfg->id == EXYNOS5_DRDPHY_PIPE3)
+		exynosautov920_usb31drd_ssphy_disable(phy_drd);
 
 	/* enable PHY isol */
 	inst->phy_cfg->phy_isol(inst, true);
@@ -2320,10 +2600,44 @@ static int exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static const char * const exynosautov920_usb30_regulators[] = {
+	"dvdd", "vdd18",
+};
+
 static const char * const exynosautov920_usb20_regulators[] = {
 	"dvdd", "vdd18", "vdd33",
 };
 
+static const struct
+exynos5_usbdrd_phy_config usb31drd_phy_cfg_exynosautov920[] = {
+	{
+		.id		= EXYNOS5_DRDPHY_PIPE3,
+		.phy_isol	= exynos5_usbdrd_phy_isol,
+		.phy_init	= exynosautov920_usb31drd_pipe3_init,
+	},
+};
+
+static const struct phy_ops exynosautov920_usb31drd_combo_ssphy_ops = {
+	.init		= exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_init,
+	.exit		= exynosautov920_usbdrd_combo_phy_exit,
+	.power_on	= exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_power_on,
+	.power_off	= exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_power_off,
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static const
+struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy_drvdata exynosautov920_usb31drd_combo_ssphy = {
+	.phy_cfg		= usb31drd_phy_cfg_exynosautov920,
+	.phy_ops		= &exynosautov920_usb31drd_combo_ssphy_ops,
+	.pmu_offset_usbdrd0_phy	= EXYNOSAUTOV920_PHY_CTRL_USB31,
+	.clk_names		= exynos5_clk_names,
+	.n_clks			= ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_clk_names),
+	.core_clk_names		= exynos5_core_clk_names,
+	.n_core_clks		= ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5_core_clk_names),
+	.regulator_names	= exynosautov920_usb30_regulators,
+	.n_regulators		= ARRAY_SIZE(exynosautov920_usb30_regulators),
+};
+
 static const struct phy_ops exynosautov920_usbdrd_combo_hsphy_ops = {
 	.init		= exynosautov920_usbdrd_phy_init,
 	.exit		= exynosautov920_usbdrd_combo_phy_exit,
@@ -2588,6 +2902,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos5_usbdrd_phy_of_match[] = {
 	}, {
 		.compatible = "samsung,exynos990-usbdrd-phy",
 		.data = &exynos990_usbdrd_phy
+	}, {
+		.compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-usb31drd-combo-ssphy",
+		.data = &exynosautov920_usb31drd_combo_ssphy
 	}, {
 		.compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-usbdrd-combo-hsphy",
 		.data = &exynosautov920_usbdrd_combo_hsphy
diff --git a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
index 4923f9be3d1f..f96c773b85c9 100644
--- a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
@@ -690,4 +690,5 @@
 
 /* exynosautov920 */
 #define EXYNOSAUTOV920_PHY_CTRL_USB20				(0x0710)
+#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_PHY_CTRL_USB31				(0x0714)
 #endif /* __LINUX_SOC_EXYNOS_REGS_PMU_H */
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [PATCH v8 6/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support SS combo phy for ExynosAutov920

[Alim Akhtar]

Hi Pritam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 1:08 PM
> To: vkoul@kernel.org; kishon@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org;
> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; alim.akhtar@samsung.com;
> andre.draszik@linaro.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; kauschluss@disroot.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com; igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@samsung.com; s.nawrocki@samsung.com;
> pritam.sutar@samsung.com
> Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; rosa.pila@samsung.com;
> dev.tailor@samsung.com; faraz.ata@samsung.com;
> muhammed.ali@samsung.com; selvarasu.g@samsung.com
> Subject: [PATCH v8 6/6] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support SS combo phy for
> ExynosAutov920
> 
> Add required change in phy driver to support combo SS phy for this SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@samsung.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>