From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Fedin Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410 Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 12:00:43 +0300 Message-ID: <001c01d117a8$74d70c10$5e852430$@samsung.com> References: <5639B588.1080901@samsung.com> <000b01d1179f$ed5032b0$c7f09810$@samsung.com> <563B0E4D.6020808@samsung.com> <001a01d117a6$3aed1140$b0c733c0$@samsung.com> <563B189D.4080907@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <563B189D.4080907@samsung.com> Content-language: ru Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Krzysztof Kozlowski' , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: 'Rob Herring' , 'Pawel Moll' , 'Mark Rutland' , 'Ian Campbell' , 'Kumar Gala' , 'Kukjin Kim' List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hello! > >>>>> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by > >>>>> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set: > >>>>> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs > >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html > >>>> > >>>> Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback > >>>> and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest... > >>> > >>> I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. Where can > >>> i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and include > >>> into my set. > >> > >> Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5: > >> > >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html > >> Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in > >> exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed). > >> > >> Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper. > > > > Ah, it's odroidXU device tree. Sorry, i don't have this particular board, and my patch > actually doesn't need it. I could do some > > blind modifications, but cannot test them, and this is out of my scope at all. > > As mentioned in the commit msg, i need only 0003 and 0004 from there. Can they be picked up > independently? They don't need 0002 by > > themselves, only 0005 needs it. > > Indeed the order of patches is messed up and this makes the confusion. I > was waiting for resend of entire patchset but you are right - this is > not required. 3 and 4 can be applied independently. > > If they apply, I will pick up them after merge window. They should. I have quite recent linux-next tree, i've just checked, 0003 applies with a small fuzz and 0004 applies without problems at all. > If they don't, they will need rebasing by someone. Maybe you can take > care of them? Of course. Please notify me if rebasing will be needed, i'll do it. > You have the SMDK5410 for testing, right? Of course. And you can already get my Tested-by: Pavel Fedin on those two because my experimental tree already uses them, and everything works quite well. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia