From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv3 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk
 to host's quirk
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 20:53:23 +0900
Message-ID: <002101cf9c35$8da5b240$a8f116c0$%jun@samsung.com>
References: <1404976119-10777-1-git-send-email-jh80.chung@samsung.com>
 <1404976119-10777-6-git-send-email-jh80.chung@samsung.com>
 <CAPDyKFoQ_ER7FAk_jCBURAa3_hVT25GXfQQfiDhMoYypdA=fHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <53BE5F9F.6070809@samsung.com>
 <CAPDyKFrLJJn=SGpjtCq+x88EetBQQBCqgef9z9+3oEVut4upTg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-reply-to: <CAPDyKFrLJJn=SGpjtCq+x88EetBQQBCqgef9z9+3oEVut4upTg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-language: ko
Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: 'Ulf Hansson' <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, 'Jaehoon Chung' <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Cc: 'linux-mmc' <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, 'Chris Ball' <chris@printf.net>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?'Heiko_St=C3=BCbner'?= <heiko@sntech.de>, dinguyen@altera.com, 'Mark Rutland' <mark.rutland@arm.com>, 'Kukjin Kim' <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, 'linux-samsung-soc' <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, July 10, 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 10 July 2014 11:40, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Hi, Ulf.
> >
> > On 07/10/2014 06:15 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> On 10 July 2014 09:08, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:
> >>> Replaced the "disable-wp" into host's quirks.
> >>> (Because the slot-node is removed at dt-file.)
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> Hi Jaehoon,
> >>
> >> I plan to carry these patches through my mmc tree and I will share
> >> them through a PR from an immutable branch with the ARM SoC guys.
> >> Please tell me if you have any concern with this set up.
> 
> Hmm, I having a second thought around this. Could I just apply the mmc
> patches for my next branch instead of involving ARM SoC? In other
> words, are there any decencies? If not, I might just apply patch 1 and
> 5.
> 

[PATCHv4 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc
[PATCHv4 4/5] ARM: dts: rockchip: unuse the slot-node and deprecated the supports-highspeed for dw-mmc
[PATCHv4 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk

2nd and 4th are closely related 5th.
I think it shall be picked together. How about taking whole patch?
And I hope that it is applied for 3.16-rcX fix.
(Also, 3rd patch is close to fix patch.)

Kukjin,
Is it fine to be taken in Ulf's?

Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon