From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jingoo Han Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/3] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:04:47 +0900 Message-ID: <00d801ce6da5$fa792d80$ef6b8880$@samsung.com> References: <00c201ce6d85$83b072a0$8b1157e0$@samsung.com> <3250954.dVh4O1LchK@flatron> <00c501ce6d8f$af1bf900$0d53eb00$@samsung.com> <201306201216.37248.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <201306201216.37248.arnd@arndb.de> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Arnd Bergmann' Cc: 'Tomasz Figa' , 'Kukjin Kim' , 'Bjorn Helgaas' , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 'Grant Likely' , 'Andrew Murray' , 'Thomas Petazzoni' , 'Thierry Reding' , 'Jason Gunthorpe' , 'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla' , 'Siva Reddy Kallam' , 'Thomas Abraham' , Jingoo Han List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 20 June 2013, Jingoo Han wrote: > > 2. patch adding label to the pinctrl node (which is a prerequisite) and > > board-specific properties of PCIe nodes. > > [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for exynos5440-ssdk5440 > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts > > + > > + pcie0@290000 { > > + reset-gpio = <&pin_ctrl 5 0>; > > + }; > > + > > + pcie1@2a0000 { > > + reset-gpio = <&pin_ctrl 22 0>; > > + }; > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi > > - pinctrl { > > + pin_ctrl: pinctrl { > > > > Note that you don't really have to use a label, you can also refer > to the pinctrl node by its full path, which is just "/pinctrl" > or "/pinctrl@e0000". I see. But, I have a question. Using phandle has been the usual way to referring to a node. Why do you want to do it differently? Best regards, Jingoo Han > > Arnd