RE: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Add fsd spi compatible

["Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@kernel.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 8:32 PM
>To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
>Cc: 'Lee Jones' <lee.jones@linaro.org>;
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
>linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
>linus.walleij@linaro.org; robh+dt@kernel.org;
>krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org;
>pankaj.dubey@samsung.com; andi@etezian.org; linux-spi@vger.kernel.org;
>linux-fsd@tesla.com; 'Adithya K V' <adithya.kv@samsung.com>
>Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Add fsd spi
>compatible
>
>On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:15:15PM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>
>> >There were changes adding the FSD SoC as well as DT stuff IIRC.
>
>> FSD SoC DT changes are already in -next.
>> I think this can go with MFD tree because of immutable branch between
>> MFD, SPI and DT due for the v5.18 merge windows.
>> I am not sure if there are better ways to handle this.
>
>I need the changes that are hard dependencies to actually be in my tree so
my
>tree is not broken, -next isn't good enough here.  If there are
dependencies
>for things you're posting you should explicitly say what they are when you
>post (not just vauge statements that there are dependencies), and when you
>post things that will be dependencies for other trees it's good to mention
this
>so that people can think about putting them on a separate branch for easier
>cross merging.
Sorry Mark for the noise. I should have clearly mentioned the dependencies. 
Surly I will keep this in mind for the future patches.

Only dependency these two patches have on 

  https://lore.kernel.org/all/YiYC7eYx2SpPILyl@google.com/

  spi: dt-bindings: samsung: Convert to dtschema

which is now in MFD tree.