RE: [PATCH v6 01/16] clk: samsung: add common clock framework helper functions for Samsung platforms

[Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>]

Tomasz Figa wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sunday 03 of March 2013 12:17:29 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 03/03/2013 02:08 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > But is there an easy way to define more than one alias? On the s3c2416
> > > for example the hsmmc hclk is the "hsmmc" io-clock, as well as the
> > > source for the "mmc_busclk.0". Same for the "uart" pclk, that is also
> > > a baud clock source.
> > This driver currently provides for only one additional clkdev lookup
> > entry per a platform clock. I pointed out this desing issue in the
> > early version of the patch set. It's because a machine clock definition
> > is coupled with a clock consumer definition. And IMO various
> > samsung_clock_register_* functions should not have
> > clk_register_clkdev() inside them. I.e. first step could be registering
> > all machine clocks and in the second one clkdev lookup entries could be
> > created. This is how most (all?) existing SoC clock drivers are
> > working.
> >
> > But those multiple aliases are important only for machines with device
> > tree support, aren't they ?
> 
> I suppose you meant _without_ device tree support, right?
> 
> > I hope this patch series gets merged early to linux-next in the 3.10
> > cycle so the multiple accumulated fixup patches for this clock driver
> > can be merged as well and issues like that you pointed out can be
> > resolved with incremental patches.
> 
> Yes, I hope so too.
>
Yes, I will in this weekend.

Note, I will modify [07/16] for universal_c210 as per Kyungmin's request,
I'm not sure about universal_c210 though.

Thanks.

- Kukjin