From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: Add basic dts include files for Samsung S3C64xx SoCs Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:15:48 -0800 Message-ID: <016c01cdfb30$64f80430$2ee80c90$@samsung.com> References: <1358039458-31960-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <20130114150531.GE21142@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20130116105957.GA1963@linaro.org> <3747315.IyCCRDXgbD@flatron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <3747315.IyCCRDXgbD@flatron> Content-language: en-us Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Tomasz Figa' , 'Dave Martin' Cc: 'Lorenzo Pieralisi' , 'Mark Rutland' , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, kwangwoo.lee@gmail.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, mcuelenaere@gmail.com, augulis.darius@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Tomasz Figa wrote: [...] > > Well, the number of CPU types does not grow rapidly. It will be much > > less than one per SoC -- so keeping the list up to date shouldn't be > > that much effort. > > > > For ARM1176JZF-S, it could make sense for the comatible list to be > > > > "arm,arm1176jzf-s", "arm,arm1176" > > > > ...since the differences between 1176 variants are software probeable > > (i.e., whether there is an FPU or not). AFAIK the J, Z apply to all > > ARM1176, and the -S (synthesisable RTL) is nothing to do with software. > > The kernel probably only really needs to know "arm,arm1176". > > OK. So the conclusion is that I should change the cpus node to following: > > cpus { > cpu { cpu@0 { ? > compatible = "arm,arm1176jzf-s", "arm,arm1176"; > }; > }; > > Am I right? > I think so :-) - Kukjin