From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: undocumented compatible strings Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:09:36 -0600 Message-ID: <0198783C-A824-4165-871C-9FDCFBCF04AA@codeaurora.org> References: <527838F0.2000803@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Olof Johansson , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> >>> Undocumented compatible strings in kernel sources: >>> 1682m-rng >>> electra-cf >>> electra-ide >>> pasemi,localbus >>> pasemi,localbus-nand >>> pasemi,pwrficient-rng >>> pasemi,sdc >> >> These will never be documented in the same way as flat device tree, >> just as the IBM and Sparc bindings won't be. > > Yes, I know. As well as FSL PPC... > > We may need some way to filter these out from whatever checker we come > up with. I was debating whether to add an undocumented, grandfathered > bindings document to capture these. The FSL PPC should have bindings, there are some cases that we put in things with simple nodes that had a compat, a reg, and maybe an irq w/o having a full binding. - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html