devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp-ufs: fix sc8280xp binding
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 22:11:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <02bf2278-a204-f258-48ff-18aeec4d2858@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221024090041.19574-9-johan+linaro@kernel.org>

On 24/10/2022 05:00, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The current QMP UFS PHY bindings are based on the original MSM8996 PCIe
> PHY binding which provided multiple PHYs per IP block and these in turn
> were described by child nodes.
> 
> The QMP UFS PHY block only provide a single PHY and the remnant child
> node does not really reflect the hardware.
> 
> The original MSM8996 binding also ended up describing the individual
> register blocks as belonging to either the wrapper node or the PHY child
> nodes.
> 
> This is an unnecessary level of detail which has lead to problems when
> later IP blocks using different register layouts have been forced to fit
> the original mould rather than updating the binding. The bindings are
> arguable also incomplete as they only the describe register blocks used
> by the current Linux drivers.
> 
> Add a new binding for the UFS QMP PHYs found on SC8280XP which further
> bindings can be based on.
> 
> Note that the current binding is simply removed instead of being
> deprecated as it was only recently merged and support for SC8280XP is
> still under development.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>



Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-28  2:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-24  9:00 [PATCH 00/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: fix sc8280xp binding Johan Hovold
2022-10-24  9:00 ` [PATCH 01/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: move device-id table Johan Hovold
2022-10-24 13:29   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-24  9:00 ` [PATCH 02/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: merge driver data Johan Hovold
2022-10-24 13:30   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-24  9:00 ` [PATCH 03/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: clean up device-tree parsing Johan Hovold
2022-10-24 13:30   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-24  9:00 ` [PATCH 04/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: clean up probe initialisation Johan Hovold
2022-10-24 13:31   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-24  9:00 ` [PATCH 05/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: rename PHY ops structure Johan Hovold
2022-10-24 13:31   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-24  9:00 ` [PATCH 06/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: clean up PHY init Johan Hovold
2022-10-24 13:31   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-24  9:00 ` [PATCH 07/10] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp-ufs: rename current bindings Johan Hovold
2022-10-28  2:09   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-24  9:00 ` [PATCH 08/10] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp-ufs: fix sc8280xp binding Johan Hovold
2022-10-28  2:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2022-10-24  9:00 ` [PATCH 09/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: restructure PHY creation Johan Hovold
2022-10-24 13:32   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-24  9:00 ` [PATCH 10/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: add support for updated sc8280xp binding Johan Hovold
2022-10-24 13:32   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-24 14:03 ` [PATCH 00/10] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: fix " Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-10-28 13:00 ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=02bf2278-a204-f258-48ff-18aeec4d2858@linaro.org \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).