From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
To: 'Jonghwan Choi' <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
'Jonghwan Choi' <jhbird.choi@gmail.com>,
'Viresh Kumar' <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
'Tomasz Figa' <t.figa@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 19:54:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <037e01cf70f5$25b374d0$711a5e70$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001cf70f0$2e48f930$8adaeb90$@samsung.com>
Jonghwan Choi wrote:
>
> Commit 7da83a80 ("ARM: EXYNOS: Migrate Exynos specific macros from plat to
> mach") which lands in samsung tree causes build breakage
> for cpufreq-exynos like following:
>
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c: In function 'exynos_cpufreq_probe':
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:166:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'soc_is_exynos4210'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:168:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'soc_is_exynos4212'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:168:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'soc_is_exynos4412'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:170:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'soc_is_exynos5250'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c: In function 'exynos4x12_set_clkdiv':
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c:118:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'soc_is_exynos4212'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [drivers/cpufreq] Error 2
> This fixes above error with getting SoC information via
> of_machine_is_compatible() instead of soc_is_exynosXXXX().
>
Probably,
Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa ?
> Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>
Looks better.
Rafael, if you have no objection on this, shall I pick this into samsung
tree for 3.16 because of the current build breakage with enabling exynos
cpufreq?
Thanks,
Kukjin
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.h | 8 ++++++++
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c | 11 ++++-------
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-
> cpufreq.c
> index f99cfe2..9aecffef 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
>
> #include <plat/cpu.h>
>
> @@ -163,11 +164,24 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> if (!exynos_info)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (soc_is_exynos4210())
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4210")) {
> + exynos_info->type = EXYNOS_SOC_4210;
> + } else if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4212")) {
> + exynos_info->type = EXYNOS_SOC_4212;
> + } else if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4412")) {
> + exynos_info->type = EXYNOS_SOC_4212;
> + } else if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5250")) {
> + exynos_info->type = EXYNOS_SOC_5250;
> + } else {
> + pr_err("%s: Unknown SoC type\n", __func__);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + if (exynos_info->type == EXYNOS_SOC_4210)
> ret = exynos4210_cpufreq_init(exynos_info);
> - else if (soc_is_exynos4212() || soc_is_exynos4412())
> + else if (exynos_info->type == EXYNOS_SOC_4212 || exynos_info->type
> == EXYNOS_SOC_4412)
> ret = exynos4x12_cpufreq_init(exynos_info);
> - else if (soc_is_exynos5250())
> + else if (exynos_info->type == EXYNOS_SOC_5250)
> ret = exynos5250_cpufreq_init(exynos_info);
> else
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.h b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-
> cpufreq.h
> index 3ddade8..f189547 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.h
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,13 @@ enum cpufreq_level_index {
> L20,
> };
>
> +enum exynos_soc_type {
> + EXYNOS_SOC_4210,
> + EXYNOS_SOC_4212,
> + EXYNOS_SOC_4412,
> + EXYNOS_SOC_5250,
> +};
> +
> #define APLL_FREQ(f, a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, b0, b1, b2, m, p, s)
> \
> { \
> .freq = (f) * 1000, \
> @@ -34,6 +41,7 @@ struct apll_freq {
> };
>
> struct exynos_dvfs_info {
> + enum exynos_soc_type type;
> unsigned long mpll_freq_khz;
> unsigned int pll_safe_idx;
> struct clk *cpu_clk;
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c
> index 466c76a..63a3907 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ static struct apll_freq apll_freq_4412[] = {
> static void exynos4x12_set_clkdiv(unsigned int div_index)
> {
> unsigned int tmp;
> - unsigned int stat_cpu1;
>
> /* Change Divider - CPU0 */
>
> @@ -115,13 +114,11 @@ static void exynos4x12_set_clkdiv(unsigned int
> div_index)
> tmp = apll_freq_4x12[div_index].clk_div_cpu1;
>
> __raw_writel(tmp, EXYNOS4_CLKDIV_CPU1);
> - if (soc_is_exynos4212())
> - stat_cpu1 = 0x11;
> - else
> - stat_cpu1 = 0x111;
>
> - while (__raw_readl(EXYNOS4_CLKDIV_STATCPU1) & stat_cpu1)
> + do {
> cpu_relax();
> + tmp = __raw_readl(EXYNOS4_CLKDIV_STATCPU1);
> + } while (tmp != 0x0);
> }
>
> static void exynos4x12_set_apll(unsigned int index)
> @@ -184,7 +181,7 @@ int exynos4x12_cpufreq_init(struct exynos_dvfs_info
> *info)
> if (IS_ERR(mout_apll))
> goto err_mout_apll;
>
> - if (soc_is_exynos4212())
> + if (info->type == EXYNOS_SOC_4212)
> apll_freq_4x12 = apll_freq_4212;
> else
> apll_freq_4x12 = apll_freq_4412;
> --
> 1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-16 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-16 10:18 [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error Jonghwan Choi
2014-05-16 10:54 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2014-05-16 23:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16 23:24 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-16 23:28 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-19 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-20 0:29 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-16 11:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-16 23:26 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-16 23:37 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-16 23:44 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='037e01cf70f5$25b374d0$711a5e70$@samsung.com' \
--to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jhbird.choi@gmail.com \
--cc=jhbird.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).