From: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2: use pci for device nodes
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 12:45:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04549e98-7f05-4d2e-8b08-d42f44c1daa4@riscstar.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901173941.294E01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On 9/1/26 12:39 PM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] Conceptual Flaw / False Premise: Renaming the node does not prevent it from being treated as a PCI bus because `device_type = "pci"` is still present.
> --
>
> commit 3cd795cb2f33ffae376d5bceb9ba0da490602d05
> Author: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
>
> arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2: use pci for device nodes
>
> This commit renames devicetree nodes from pcie@ to pci@ with the intent of
> stopping the embedded PCIe endpoints from being treated as PCI buses by the
> devicetree parsing code.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs6490-rb3gen2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs6490-rb3gen2.dts
>> index a13315bf0fb07..99a985a177a61 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs6490-rb3gen2.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs6490-rb3gen2.dts
>> @@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ pcie@3,0 {
>> ranges;
>> bus-range = <0x5 0xff>;
>>
>> - pcie@0,0 {
>> + pci@0,0 {
>> reg = <0x50000 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
>> #address-cells = <3>;
>> #size-cells = <2>;
>> device_type = "pci";
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does this node rename actually prevent the devicetree parsing code from
> treating it as a PCI bus?
This patch (series) is being done separate from another pre-existing
series that addresses that particular issue. I suppose once that
is merged I can re-issue this one.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260901013654.1343537-1-elder@riscstar.com/
It looks like I might get a similar comment from Sashiko on other
patches in this series... I won't respond to any others unless what
is noted differs from what I've explained here.
-Alex
> The commit message indicates that renaming the node away from pcie@ will stop
> of_node_is_pcie() from matching it. However, because this node explicitly
> specifies device_type = "pci", of_bus_pci_match() in drivers/of/address.c
> will still return true immediately.
>
> When evaluating buses, of_bus_pci_match() checks:
>
> of_node_is_type(np, "pci") || of_node_is_pcie(np)
>
> Since the device type is explicitly "pci", the match succeeds before
> of_node_is_pcie() is evaluated. Should device_type = "pci" also be removed to
> actually prevent this endpoint from being treated as a PCI bridge?
>
> [ ... ]
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 17:20 [PATCH 0/5] arm64: dts: qcom: use pci for device nodes Alex Elder
2026-09-01 17:20 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2: " Alex Elder
2026-09-01 17:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 17:45 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2026-09-01 20:05 ` Rob Herring
2026-09-02 12:51 ` Alex Elder
2026-09-02 16:53 ` Rob Herring
2026-09-02 18:40 ` Alex Elder
2026-09-01 17:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2-industrial-mezzanine: " Alex Elder
2026-09-01 17:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 17:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans-evk-ifp-mezzanine: " Alex Elder
2026-09-01 17:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 17:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-evk-ifp-mezzanine: use dev " Alex Elder
2026-09-01 17:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 18:18 ` Alex Elder
2026-09-01 17:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-thundercomm-minipc-g1iot: " Alex Elder
2026-09-01 18:03 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04549e98-7f05-4d2e-8b08-d42f44c1daa4@riscstar.com \
--to=elder@riscstar.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox